doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2014.2.72eng
UDC 636.52/.58:577.121:577.152.2
THE ROLE OF AMINOTRASFERASE ACTIVITY IN HEN PRODUCTIVITY
Т.I. Sereda, M.A. Derkho
Ural State Academy of Veterinary Medicine,
13, ul. Gagarina, Troitsk, Chelyabinsk Province, 457105 Russia,
e-mail: tvi_t@mail.ru
Received March 12, 2013
Enzymes are known to play the significant role in gene expression during ontogenesis, in maintenance of homeostasis and regulation of growth and development, and in productive traits. To estimate the physiological conditions and egg productivity in hens, the alanine and aspartate ami-notrasferases (AlAT and AsAT) activity is considered as the most adequate. Nevertheless, the investigations of fermentative status in tissues and organs of hens are limited, and particularly, the information on specific effects of the age, the stage of the oviposition period, and the egg productivity to AlAT and AsAT activity in hen blood and tissues was not found in the accessible literature. We studied the dynamics of AlAT and AsAT activity in blood, liver, heart and kidneys during egg laying (26, 52 and 80 weeks) in Lohmann White hens from commercial farm. It was shown the changes of activities and the ratio of AlAT and AsAT, even if the physiological variability is not exceeded, occur due to metabolic changes. There is the relationship between the catalytic activity of AlAT, AsAT, AlAT/AsAT ratio in blood serum and in liver, heart and kidneys cells. The functional parameters of AlAT and AsAT reflect both the intensiveness and specificity of amino acids metabolism in cells, and the rate of enzymes output from cells to blood, and also correlate with egg productivity. Thus, the amount of AlAT and AsAT in hepatocytes and the rate of aminotransferases output to blood during the physiological regeneration the mostly affect the AlAT and AsAT concentrations, ratio and activity in blood, which, in turn, determine the character of biochemical changes of amino acids in hens and, as a result, affect the egg production.
Keywords: aminotransferase, blood, organs, chickens, hens, productivity.
REFERENCES
1. Kolesnik E.A., Derkho M.A. Agrarnyi vestnik Urala, 2011, 3(82): 27-29.
2. Kochish I.I., Petrash M.G., Smirnov S.B. Ptitsevodstvo, 2010, 4: 34-35.
3. Kudrin A.G. Fermenty krovi i prognozirovanie produktivnosti molochnogo skota [Blood enzymes and productivity prediction in dairy cattle]. Michurinsk, 2006.
4. Mosyagin V.V. Vliyanie vozrasta i fiziologicheskogo sostoyaniya na aktivnost' fermentnykh sistem kletok, tkanei i organov zhivotnykh. Avtoreferat doktorskoi dissertatsii [Influence of age and physiological status of animals on enzymatic activity in cells, tissues and organs. PhD Thesis]. Moscow, 2011.
5. Mosyagin V.V., Furman Yu.V., Maksimov V.I. Biokhimiya aktivnogo transporta, metabolizma belka i energii v organizme ptits [Biochemistry of active transport, protein metabolism, and energy in birds]. Kursk, 2009.
6. Nadinskaya M.Yu. Gastroenterologiya, 2006, 1: 12-16.
7. Nguen Tkhi Fyok Nuan. Belki i aktivnost' aspartataminotransferazy, shchelochnoi i kisloi fosfataz v syvorotke krovi kur raznykh linii krossa Belarus' 9 v ontogeneze. Kandidatskaya dissertatsiya [Peptides and activity of acid aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline and acid phosphatases in blood serum of Belarus 9 cross hens during ontogenesis. PhD Thesis]. Moscow, 1984: 112-119.
8. Usha B.V., Belyakov I.M., Pushkarev R.P. Klinicheskaya diagnostika vnutrennikh nezaraznykh boleznei zhivotnykh [Clinical diagnostics of internal non-contagious diseases in animals]. Moscow, 2004.
9. Berezov T.T., Korovkin B.F. Biologicheskaya khimiya [Biochemistry]. Moscow, 2008.
10. Nagradova N.K., Muronets V.I. Itogi nauki i tekhniki. Ser. Biol. khimiya. Tom 38 [The results of science and technologies. Ser. Biological chemistry. Vol. 38]. Moscow, 1991.
11. Rebrova O.Yu. Statisticheskii analiz meditsinskikh dannykh. Primenenie paketa prikladnykh programm STATISTICA [Statistical analysis in medicine. STATISTICA application package]. Moscow, 2002.
12. Khiggins K. Rasshifrovka klinicheskikh laboratornykh analizov /Pod red. V.L. Emmanuelya [Deciphering clinical analyzes. V.L. Emmanuel (ed.)]. Moscow, 2006.
13. Lazareva L.V. Fundamental'nye issledovaniya, 2007, 9: 72-74.
14. Lazareva L.V. Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya, 2003, 5: 40-42.
15. Saprunov D.A., Kvochko A.N., Krivoruchko A.Yu. Agrarnyi vestnik Urala, 2010, 2(68): 65-66.
16. Asmarian S., Rajaian H., Mortazavi P., Nazifi S., Ansari Lari M., Mehdinejad B., Hosseini R., Ashrafi A. Salinomycin toxicity in chickens: biochemical changes and treatment with hypertonic dextrose. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 2010, 4(11): 5683-5688.
