PLANT BIOLOGY
ANIMAL BIOLOGY
SUBSCRIPTION
E-SUBSCRIPTION
 
MAP
MAIN PAGE

 

 

 

 

doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2025.6.941eng

UDC: 638.1:57.02

Acknowledgements:
Supported financially by the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 25-16-00176

 

ETHOLOGICAL AND GENETIC BASIS OF RESISTANCE OF HONEY BEE (Apis mellifera) TO Varroa destructor MITES (review)

M.S. Fornara, I.A. Leshchenko, I.S. Kuvika

Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 60, pos. Dubrovitsy, Podolsk District, Moscow Province, 142132 Russia, e-mail margaretfornara@gmail.com (✉ corresponding author), hellobrat5@gmail.com, kuvika2000@mail.ru

ORCID:
Fornara M.S. orcid.org/0000-0002-8844-177X
Kuvika I.S. orcid.org/0009-0000-6658-0114
Leshchenko I.A. orcid.org/0009-0002-5821-2682

Final revision received September 24, 2025
Accepted October 16, 2025

The honey bee (Apis mellifera) is a key pollinator and an important model organism for studying social behavior, immunity, and adaptation (N. Gallai et al., 2009; S.A.M. Khalifa et al., 2021). Bee populations worldwide are adapting to various conditions, pathogens, and parasites, such as the mite Varroa destructor (D. Goulson et al., 2015; D. Frizzera et al., 2023). Understanding the genetic basis of these adaptive traits remains a priority task in apicultural science. The aim of this review is to systematize modern scientific approaches to studying the genetic and behavioral mechanisms of honey bee resistance to the parasitic mite Varroa destructor and to evaluate the prospects of their application in breeding programs, including traditional selection methods and innovative genomic technologies. Infestation by V. destructor negatively impacts beekeeping by reducing the lifespan of bees (D. Annoscia et al., 2015; B. Han et al., 2024). Mites also serve as vectors for viral diseases (M.E. Oz et al., 2025; K.S. Traynor et al., 2020). Bees exhibiting hygienic behavior (Varroa-Sensitive Hygiene, VSH) are capable of detecting, uncapping, and removing infested brood (F. Mondet et al., 2020; R.M. Russo et al., 2024). Research has deepened the understanding of the neurobiological basis of VSH, revealing the role of oleic acid and olfactory receptors in sensors (A. McAfee et al., 2018), as well as the coordination of actions by performers (K.M. Wagoner et al., 2020; K.A. Khan et al., 2021). Traditional methods for evaluating hygienic behavior have limitations, which stimulates the development of standardized approaches (O.A. Modin, 2012). The low frequency of hygienic behavior underscores the relevance of selective breeding. Naturally resistant bee populations, for example on Gotland Island (S. Thaduri et al., 2018), in France (Y. Le Conte et al., 2007), and Norway (M.A.Y. Oddie et al., 2017), are valuable genetic resources. Grooming is another resistance factor, in which bees remove mites from their own or another's body (D.J. Pritchard et al., 2016). Africanized bees serve as an example of high grooming activity (C. Invernizzi et al., 2015). Genetic studies reveal factors of bee susceptibility to pathogens. Resistance to varroosis is associated with differences in physiology and behavior (Y. Zhang et al., 2010), while genomic resources from the "Honey Bee Genome Project" (G.E. Robinson et al., 2006) are actively used. The study of QTL (D. Behrens et al., 2011) and SNP (A. Spotter et al., 2016) has identified genetic markers associated with hygienic behavior, including genes related to olfaction, the nervous system (Neurexin-1, octopamine receptors), immune response (hymenoptaecin), and ecdysone metabolism (Mblk-1) (R. Parker et al., 2012; J.D. Evans et al., 2019). Large-scale studies (M. Sotek et al., 2025) and targeted selection for suppressed mite reproduction (M.G. De Lorio et al., 2025) demonstrate the success of population improvement. Active groomers show a specific gene expression pattern, including Neurexin-1, poly-U-binding factor. kd 68, and cytochrome P450 (M.M. Hamiduzzaman et al., 2017), with Neurexin-1 proposed as a molecular biomarker (D. Kabakcı et al., 2025). The CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing system (Y. Ishino et al., 1987; F.J. Mojica et al., 1993) provides targeted gene modifications (X.F. Hu et al., 2019), allows for investigation of caste development (A. Roth et al., 2019), creation of pesticide-resistant bees (E. Inak et al., 2024) and editing the genomes of symbionts (P.J. Lariviere et al., 2024; Q. Huang et al., 2023). However, the application of CRISPR is associated with technical, ethical, and regulatory challenges. In the future, CRISPR will serve as a tool for validating candidate genes for traditional breeding. Achieving success in breeding bee colonies resistant to varroosis requires integrating traditional breeding methods with advanced genomic technologies. This includes studying hygienic behavior and grooming, identifying genetic markers, and using molecular biomarkers. A balanced approach is necessary, which not only increases resistance to Varroa but also preserves the economic traits of bees. The implementation of integrated strategies, international cooperation, and standardization of methods are critically important for creating resistant honey bee populations in the long term.

Keywords: honey bee, Varroa destructor mite, hygienic behavior, grooming, genetic markers.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Gallai N., Salles J.M., Settele J., Vaissière B.E. Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(3): 810-821 CrossRef
  2. Klein S., Cabirol A., Devaud J.M., Barron A.B., Lihoreau M. Why bees are so vulnerable to environmental stressors. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2017, 32(4): 268-278 CrossRef
  3. Khalifa S.A.M., Elshafiey E.H., Shetaia A.A., El-Wahed A.A., Algethami A.F., Musharraf S.G., AlAjmi M.F., Zhao C., Masry S.H.D., Abdel-Daim M.M., Halabi M.F., Kai G., Al Naggar Y., Bishr M., Diab M.A.M., El-Seedi H.R. Overview of bee pollination and its economic value for crop production. Insects, 2021, 12(8): 688 CrossRef
  4. Robinson G.E., Grozinger C.M., Whitfield C.W. Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2005, 6(4): 257-270 CrossRef
  5. Rosenkranz P., Aumeier P., Ziegelmann B. Biology and control of Varroa destructor. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2010, 103(Suppl.): 96-119 CrossRef
  6. Goulson D., Nicholls E., Botías C., Rotheray E.L. Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers. Science, 2015, 347(6229): 1255957 CrossRef
  7. Frizzera D., Zanni V., D'Agaro M., Boaro G., Andreuzza L., Del Fabbro S., Annoscia D., Nazzi F. Varroa destructor exacerbates the negative effect of cold contributing to honey bee mortality. Journal of Insect Physiology, 2023, 151: 104571 CrossRef
  8. Sainsbury J., Nemeth T.E., Baldo M., Jochym M., Felman C., Goodwin M., Lumsden M., Pattemore D., Jeanplong F. Marker assisted selection for Varroa destructor resistance in New Zealand honey bees. PLoS ONE, 2022, 17(9): e0273289 CrossRef
  9. Guichard M., Droz B., Brascamp E.W., von Virag A., Neuditschko M., Dainat B. Exploring two honey bee traits for improving resistance against Varroa destructor: development and genetic evaluation. Insects, 2021, 12(3): 216 CrossRef
  10. Eynard S. E., Mondet F., Basso B., Bouchez O., Le Conte Y., Dainat B., Decourtye A., Genestout L., Guichard M., Guillaume F., Labarthe E., Locke B., Mahla R., de Miranda J., Neuditschko M., Phocas F., Canale-Tabet K., Vignal A., Servin B. Sequence‐based multi ancestry association study reveals the polygenic architecture of Varroa destructor resistance in the honeybee Apis mellifera. Molecular Ecology, 2025 34(3): e17637 CrossRef
  11. Sepehri B., Alijani S., Javanmard A., Johnmohammadi H., Hasanpur K. Molecular screening of varroa‐resistant trait of honey bee colonies based on NorpA2 candidate gene polymorphism: a genetic case‐control study. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science, 2023, 13(1): 177.
  12. Harbo J.R., Harris J.W. Responses to varroa by honey bees with different levels of Varroa sensitive hygiene. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2009, 48(3): 156-161 CrossRef
  13. Ibrahim A., Spivak M. The relationship between hygienic behavior and suppression of mite reproduction as honey bee (Apis mellifera) mechanisms of resistance to Varroa destructor. Apidologie, 2006, 37(1): 31-40 CrossRef
  14. Jeyapriya G., Sumathi E., Saminathan V.R., Renukadevi P., Sasikala R., Priya S.S., Kowsika S., Pradeep S. Parasitic mites of honey bees (Apis spp.): a detailed review of varroa destructor in parasitism, pathogen transmission and its management. Acta Parasitologica, 2025, 70(5): 184 CrossRef
  15. Spivak M., Danka R.G. Perspectives on hygienic behavior in Apis mellifera and other social insects. Apidologie, 2021, 52(1): 1-16 CrossRef
  16. Ramsey S.D., Ochoa R., Bauchan G., Gulbronson C., Mowery J.D., Cohen A., Lim D., Joklik J., Cicero J.M., Ellis J.D., Hawthorne D., van Engelsdorp D. Varroa destructor feeds primarily on honey bee fat body tissue and not hemolymph. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019, 116(5): 1792-1801 CrossRef
  17. Han B., Wu J., Wei Q., Liu F., Cui L., Rueppell O., Xu S. Life-history stage determines the diet of ectoparasitic mites on their honey bee hosts. Nature Communications, 2024, 15(1): 725 CrossRef
  18. Schneider P., Drescher W. The influence of Varroa jacobsoni oud on weight, development of weight and hypopharyngeal glands, and longevity of Apis mellifera. Apidologie, 1987, 18(1): 101-110 CrossRef
  19. Annoscia D., Del Piccolo F., Covre F., Nazzi F. Mite infestation during development alters the in-hive behavior of adult honeybees. Apidologie, 2015, 46(3): 306-314 CrossRef
  20. van Dooremalen C., Gerritsen L., Cornelissen B., van der Steen J.J.M., van Langevelde F., Blacquière T. Winter survival of individual honey bees and honey bee colonies depends on level of Varroa destructor infestation. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(4): e36285 CrossRef
  21. Kefuss J., Vanpoucke J., Bolt M., Kefuss C. Selection for resistance to Varroa destructor under commercial beekeeping conditions. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2015, 54(5): 563-576 CrossRef
  22. Locke B. Natural Varroa mite-surviving Apis mellifera honeybee populations. Apidologie, 2016, 47(3): 467-482 CrossRef
  23. Nordström S., Fries I., Aarhus A., Hansen H., Korpela S. Virus infections in Nordic honey bee colonies with no, low or severe Varroa jacobsoni infection. Apidologie, 1999, 30(6): 475-484 CrossRef
  24. Oz M.E., Avci O., Dogan M. Factors influencing the prevalence of acute bee paralysis virus in Apis mellifera and insights into its phylogenetic relationships. Virus Genes, 2025, 61(2): 220-229 CrossRef
  25. Martin S.J., Highfield A.C., Brettell L., Vilavobos E.M., Budge G.E., Powell M., Nikaido S., Schroeder D.C. Global honey bee viral landscape altered by a parasitic mite. Science, 2012, 336(6086): 1304-1306 CrossRef
  26. Ryabov E.V., Wood G.R., Fannon J.M., Moore J.D., Bull J.C., Chandler D., Mead A., Burroughs N., Evans D.J. A virulent strain of deformed wing virus (DWV) of honeybees (Apis mellifera) prevails after Varroa destructor-mediated, or in Vitro, transmission. PLoS Pathogens, 2014, 10(6): e1004230 CrossRef
  27. Martin S.J., Brettell L.E. Deformed wing virus in honeybees and other insects. Annual Review of Virology, 2019, 6(1): 49-69 CrossRef
  28. Piou V., Schurr F., Dubois E., Vétillard A. Transmission of deformed wing virus between Varroa destructor foundresses, mite offspring and infested honey bees. Parasites Vectors, 2022, 15: 333 CrossRef
  29. Shafiey H., Gogol-Döring A., McMahon D.P., Doublet V., Disayathanoowat T., Paxton R.J. A new variant of slow bee paralysis virus revealed by transcriptome analysis. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2025, 64(1): 56-59 CrossRef
  30. Traynor K.S., Mondet F., de Miranda J.R., Techer M., Kowallik V., Oddie M.A.Y, Chantawannakul P., McAfee A. Varroa destructor: a complex parasite, crippling honey bees worldwide. Trends in parasitology, 2020, 36(7): 592-606 CrossRef
  31. Mondet F., Beaurepaire A., McAfee A., Locke B., Alaux C., Blanchard S., Danka B., Le Conte Y. Honey bee survival mechanisms against the parasite Varroa destructor: a systematic review of phenotypic and genomic research efforts. International Journal for Parasitology, 2020, 50(6-7): 433-447 CrossRef
  32. Russo R.M., Pietronave H., Conte C.A., Liendo M.C., Basilio A., Lanzavecchia S.B., Scannapieco A.C. Stimulus-specific gene expression profiles associated with grooming behavior and Varroa destructor resistance in honey bees. Frontiers in Bee Science, 2024, 2: 1441317 CrossRef
  33. McAfee A., Chapman A., Iovinella I., Gallagher-Kurtzke Y., Collins T.F., Higo H., Madilao L.L., Pelosi P., Foster L.J. A death pheromone, oleic acid, triggers hygienic behavior in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 5719 CrossRef
  34. Guarna M.M., Melathopoulos A.P., Huxter E., Iovinella I., Parker R., Stoynov N., Tam A., Moon K.-M., Chan Q.W.T., Pelosi P., White R., Pernal S.F., Foster L.J. A search for protein biomarkers links olfactory signal transduction to social immunity. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16(1): 63 CrossRef
  35. Wagoner K.M., Millar J.G., Schal C., Rueppell O. Cuticular pheromones stimulate hygienic behavior in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Sci Rep., 2020, 10: 7132 CrossRef
  36. Boecking O. Sealing up and non-removal of diseased and Varroa jacobsoni infested drone brood cells is part of the hygienic behaviour in Apis cerana. Journal of Apicultural Research, 1999, 38(3-4): 159-168 CrossRef
  37. Moretto G., Guerra Jr. J.C., Bittencourt C.V. Uncapping activity of Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) towards worker brood cells infested with the mite Varroa destructor Anderson & Treuman (Mesostigmata: Varroidae). Neotropical Entomology, 2006, 35(3): 299-301 CrossRef
  38. Khan K.A., Ghramh H.A. An investigation of the efficacy of hygienic behavior of various honey bee (Apis mellifera) races toward Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) mite infestation. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 2021, 33(3): 101393 CrossRef
  39. Taber S. Determining resistance to brood diseases. American Bee Journal, 1982, 122: 422-425.
  40. Thompson V.C. Behaviour genetics of nest cleaning honeybees. III. Effect of age of bees of a resistant line on their response to disease-killed brood. Journal of Apicultural Research, 1964, 3: 25-30 CrossRef
  41. Momot J.P., Rjthenbuhler W.C. Behaviour genetics of nest cleaning in honeybees. VI. Interactions of age and genotype of bees, and nectar flow. Journal of Apicultural Research, 1971, 10: 11-21 CrossRef
  42. Breed M.D., Garry M.F., Pearce A.N., Hibbard B.E., Bjostad L.B., Pasge R.E. Jr. The role of wax comb in honey bee nestmate recognition. Animal Behaviour, 1995, 50(2): 489-496 CrossRef
  43. Gramocho K.P., Spivak M. Differences in olfactory sensitivity and behavioral responses among honey bees breed for hygienic behavior. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2003, 54: 472-479 CrossRef
  44. Krivtsova L.S. V sbornike: Problemi entomologii i arakhnologii [In: Problems of entomology and arachnology]. Tyumen’, 2001: 138-140 (in Russ.).
  45. Modin O.A Sposob otsenki gigienicheskogo povedeniya pchel. A.s. 2534586 C2 (RF) MPK A 01 K55/00. Gosudarstvennoe nauchnoe uchrezhdenie Vserossiyskiy nauchno-issledovatel’skiy institut Veterinarnoy entomologii i arakhnologii Rossiyskoy akademii sel’skokhozyaystvennikh nauk (RF). № 2012153081/13. Zayavl. 07.12.2012. Opubl. 27.11.2014 [A method for assessing the hygienic behavior of bees. A.s. 2534586 C2 (RF) IPC A 01 K55/00. State scientific institution All-Russian Research Institute of Veterinary Entomology and Arachnology of the Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences (RF). No. 2012153081/13. Application 07.12.2012. Publ. 11/27/2014] (in Russ.).
  46. Brandorf A.Z., Shestakova A.I., Svishchuk D.V., Lar’kina E.O. In: General question of world science. Brussels, 2021: 123-128 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  47. Komlatskiy V.I., Strel’bitskaya O.V., Leshchenko V.A. Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Pchelovodstvo i apiterapiya: sovremennie podkhodi i razvitie» [Proc. Int. Conf. «Beekeeping and apitherapy: modern approaches and development»]. Ribnoe, 2021: 88-93 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  48. Spivak M., Gilliam M. Facultative expression of hygienic behavior of honey bees in relation to disease resistance. Journal of Apicultural Research, 1993, 32: 147-157 CrossRef
  49. Oldroyd B.P. Evaluation of Australian commercial honey bees for hygienic behavior, a critical character for tolerance to chalkbrood. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 1996, 36(5): 625-629 CrossRef
  50. Thaduri S., Locke B., Granberg F., de Miranda J.R. Temporal changes in the viromes of Swedish Varroa-resistant and Varroa-susceptible honeybee populations. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13(12): e0206938 CrossRef
  51. Le Conte Y., De Vaublanc G., Crauser D., Jeanne F., Rousselle J.-C., Bécard J.-M. Honey bee colonies that have survived Varroa destructor. Apidologie, 2007, 38(6): 566-572 CrossRef
  52. Oddie M.A.Y., Dahle B., Neumann P. Norwegian honey bees surviving Varroa destructor mite infestations by means of natural selection. Peer J., 2017, 5: e3956 CrossRef
  53. Moritz R.F.A., de Miranda J., Fries I., Le Conte Y., Neumann P., Paxton R.J. Research strategies to improve honeybee health in Europe. Apidologie, 2010, 41: 227-242 CrossRef
  54. Bourgeois A.L., Rinderer T.E. Genetic characterization of Russian honey bee stock selected for improved resistance to Varroa destructor. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2009, 102(3): 1233-1238 CrossRef
  55. Peng Y.-S., Fang Y., Xu S., Ge L., Nasr M.E., The resistance mechanism of the Asian honey bee, Apis cerana Fabr, to an ectoparasitic mite Varroa jacobsoni Oudemans. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 1987, 49(1): 54-60 CrossRef
  56. Pritchard D.J. Grooming by honey bees as a component of Varroa resistant behavior. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2016, 55: 38-48 CrossRef
  57. Dadoun N., Nait-Mouloud M., Mohammedi A., Sadeddine Zennouche O. Differences in grooming behavior between susceptible and resistant honey bee colonies after 13 years of natural selection. Apidologie, 2020, 51: 793-801 CrossRef
  58. Russo R.M., Liendo M.C., Landi L., Pietronave H., Merke J., Fain H., Muntaabski I., Palacio M.A., Rodríguez G.A., Lanzavecchia S.B., Scannapieco A.C. Grooming behavior in naturally Varroa-resistant Apis mellifera colonies from north-central Argentina. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2020, 8: 590281 CrossRef
  59. Guzman-Novoa E., Emsen B., Unger P., Espinosa-Montaño L.G., Petukhova T. Genotypic variability and relationships between mite infestation levels, mite damage, grooming intensity, and removal of Varroa destructor mites in selected strains of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 2012, 110(3): 314-320 CrossRef
  60. Invernizzi C., Zefferino I., Santos E., Sánchez L., Mendoza Y. Multilevel assessment of grooming behavior against Varroa destructor in Italian and Africanized honey bees. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2015, 54: 321-327 CrossRef
  61. Nganso B.T., Fombong A.T., Yusuf A.A., Pirk C.W., Stuhl C., Torto B. Hygienic and grooming behaviors in African and European honeybees—new damage categories in Varroa destructor. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(6): e0179329 CrossRef
  62. Tsuruda J.M., Harris J.W., Bourgeois L., Danka R.G., Hunt G.J. High-resolution linkage analyses to identify genes that influence Varroa sensitive hygiene behavior in honey bees. PLoS ONE, 2012, 7(11): e48276 CrossRef
  63. Holloway B., Sylvester H.A., Bourgeois L., Rinderer T.E. Association of single nucleotide polymorphisms to resistance to chalkbrood in Apis mellifera. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2012, 51: 154-163 CrossRef
  64. Holloway B., Tarver M.R., Rinderer T.E. Fine mapping identifies significantly associating markers for resistance to the honey bee brood fungal disease, Chalkbrood. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2013, 52(3): 134-140 CrossRef
  65. Bourgeois A.L., Rinderer T.E., de Guzman L.I., Holloway B. Molecular genetic analysis of Varroa destructor mites in brood, fallen injured mites, and worker bee longevity in honey bees. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2015, 54(4): 328-334 CrossRef
  66. Navajas M., Migeon A., Alaux C., Martin-Magniette M., Robinson G., Evans J., Cros-Arteil S., Crauser D., Le Conte Y. Differential gene expression of the honey bee Apis mellifera associated with Varroa destructor infection. BMC Genomics, 2008, 9: 301 CrossRef
  67. Zhang Y., Liu X., Zhang W., Han R. Differential gene expression of the honey bees Apis mellifera and A. cerana induced by Varroa destructor infection. Journal of Insect Physiology, 2010, 56(9): 1207-1218 CrossRef
  68. The Honeybee Genome Sequencing Consortium. Insights into social insects from the genome of the honeybee Apis mellifera. Nature, 2006, 443: 931-949 CrossRef
  69. Robinson G.E., Evans J.D., Maleszka R., Robertson H.M., Weaver D.B., Worley K., Gibbs R.A., Weinstock G.M. Sweetness and light: illuminating the honey bee genome. Insect Molecular Biology, 2006, 15(5): 535-539 CrossRef
  70. Oxley P.R., Spivak M., Oldroyd B.P. Six quantitative trait loci influence task thresholds for hygienic behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Molecular Ecology, 2010, 19(7): 1452-1461 CrossRef
  71. Lapidge K.I., Oldroyd B.P., Spivak M. Seven suggestive quantitative trait loci influence hygienic behavior of honey bees. Naturuissenschaften, 2002, 89: 565-568 CrossRef
  72. Behrens D., Huang Q., Geßner C., Rosenkranz P., Frey E., Locke B., Moritz R.F.A., Kraus F.B. Three QTL in the honey bee Apis mellifera L. suppress reproduction of the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. Ecology and Evolution, 2011, 1(4): 451-458 CrossRef
  73. Spötter A., Gupta P., Mayer M., Reisch N., Bienfeld K. Genome-wide association study of a Varroa-specific defense behavior in honeybees (Apis mellifera). Journal of Heredity, 2016, 107(3): 220-227 CrossRef
  74. Maqueira B., Chatwin H., Evans P.D. Identification and characterization of a novel family of Drosophila b-adrenefgic-like octopamine G-protein coupled. Journal of Neurochemistry, 2005, 94(2): 547-560 CrossRef
  75. Parker R., Guarna M.M., Melathopoulos A.P., Moon K.-M., White R., Huxter E., Pernal S. F., Foster L.J. Correlation of proteome-wide changes with social immunity behaviors provides insight into resistance to the parasitic mite, Varroa destructor, in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Genome Biol., 2012, 13: R81 CrossRef
  76. Riddiford L.M. Hormones and Drosophila development. In: The development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1993, 2: 899-939.
  77. Conlon B.H., Aurori A., Giurgiu A.I., Kefuss J., Dezmirean D.S., Moritz R.F.A., Routtu J. A gene for resistance to the Varroa mite (Acari) in honey bee (Apis mellifera) pupae. Molecular Ecology, 2019, 28(12): 2958-2966 CrossRef
  78. Evans J.D. Selection for barriers between honey bees and a devastating parasite. Molecular Ecology, 2019, 28(12): 2955-2957 CrossRef
  79. Šotek M., Přidal A., Urban T., Knoll A. Genetic diversity in candidate single-ucleotide polymorphisms associated with resistance in honeybees in the Czech Republic using the novel SNaPshot genotyping panel. Genes, 2025, 16(3): 301 CrossRef
  80. De Iorio M.G., Biffani S., Pagnacco G., Stella A., Cozzi M.C.S., Maggi L.A., Minozzi G. Results of four generations of selection for Varroa Sensitive hygienic behavior in honey bees. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2025, 24(1): 1959-1967 CrossRef
  81. Hamiduzzaman M. Md., Emsen B., Hunt G.J., Subhashree Subramanyam S., Williams C.E., Jennifer M., Tsuruda J.M., Guzman-Novoa E. Differential gene expression associated with honey bee grooming behavior in response to Varroa mites. Behavior Genetics, 2017, 47(3): 335-344 CrossRef
  82. Kabakcı D., Karataş Ü., Tunca R.I., Çankaya M., Karabağ K., Akdeniz G., Kuzucu M. Unveiling genetic defense mechanisms: expression analysis of hym, AmNrx1, and CYP9Q3 genes in Varroa-resistant anatolian honey bees. Veterinary Research Communications, 2025, 49: 17 CrossRef
  83. Ishino Y., Shinagawa H., Makino K., Amemura M., Nakata A. Nucleotide sequence of the iap gene, responsible for alkaline phosphatase isozyme conversion in Escherichia coli, and identification of the gene product. Journal of Bacteriology, 1987, 169(12): 5429-5433 CrossRef
  84. Mojica F.J., Juez G., Rodríguez-Valera F. Transcription at different salinities of Haloferax mediterranei sequences adjacent to partially modified PstI sites. Molecular Microbiology, 1993, 9(3): 613-621 CrossRef
  85. Jansen R., van Embden J.D., Gaastra W., Schouls L.M. Identification of genes that are associated with DNA repeats in prokaryotes. Molecular Microbiology, 2002, 43(6): 1565-1575 CrossRef
  86. Kohno H., Suenami S., Takeuchi H., Sasaki T., Kubo T. Production of knockout mutants by CRISPR/Cas9 in the European honeybee, Apis mellifera L. Zoological Science, 2016, 33(5): 505-512 CrossRef
  87. Kohno H., Kubo T. mKast is dispensable for normal development and sexual maturationof the male European honeybee. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 11877 CrossRef
  88. Hu X.F., Zhang B., Liao C.H., Zeng Z.J. High-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in honeybee (Apis mellifera) embryos. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 2019, 9(5): 1759-1766 CrossRef
  89. Roth A., Vleurinck C., Netschitailo O., Bauer V., Otte M., Kaftanoglu O., Page R.E., Beye M. A genetic switch for worker nutrition-mediated traits in honeybees. PLoS Biol., 2019, 17(3): e3000171 CrossRef
  90. İnak E., De Rouck S., Koç-İnak N., Erdem E., Rüstemoğlu M., Dermauw W., Van Leeuwen, T. Identification and CRISPR-Cas9 validation of a novel β-adrenergic-like octopamine receptor mutation associated with amitraz resistance in Varroa destructor. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, 2024, 204: 106080 CrossRef
  91. Lariviere P.J., Ashraf A.Z., Navarro-Escalante L., Leonard S.P., Miller L.G., Moran N.A., Barrick J.E. One-step genome engineering in bee gut bacterial symbionts. mBio, 2024, 15(9): e01392-24 CrossRef
  92. Huang Q., Lariviere P.J., Powell J.E., Moran N.A. Engineered gut symbiont inhibits microsporidian parasite and improves honey bee survival. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2023, 120(25): e2220922120 CrossRef

 

back

 


CONTENTS

 

Full article PDF (Rus)