doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2018.6.1219eng

UDC 636.2:591.463.1:57.086.8

 

OPTIMAL MODE TO THAW CRYOPRESERVED SPERM OF HOLSTEIN
BULL SIRES

N.A. Kombarova1, G.V. Eskin1, A.I. Abilov2, Yu.A. Kornienko-Zhilyaev2, V.N. Vinogradov2, A.A. Galankina1

1Head Center for Reproduction of Farm Animals AO, 3, ul. Tsentralnaya, pos. Bykovo, Podolsk Region, Moscow Province, 142143 Russia, e-mail komnina@list.ru(✉ corresponding author), nastenka-shar@yandex.ru;
2Ernst Federal Science Center for Animal Husbandry, 60, pos. Dubrovitsy, Podolsk District, Moscow Province, 142132 Russia, e-mail ahmed.abilov@mail.ru (✉ corresponding author), serafima_venera@mtu-net.ru, klenovo-vig@mail.ru

ORCID:
Kombarova N.A. orcid.org/0000-0003-3861-4465
Galankina A.A. orcid.org/0000-0002-5246-0506
Abilov A.I. orcid.org/0000-0001-6236-8634
Vinogradov V.N. orcid.org/0000-0002-9295-0059
Kornienko-Zhilyaev Yu.A. orcid.org/0000-0003-3554-2240
The authors declare no conflict of interests

Received April 10, 2018

 

As milk yielding increases, the number of animals with defective sexual cycles and quiet manifestations of hunting grows, and therefore there is a need for semen with high quality. Also, at artificial insemination, after dilution of the native semen, packaging, cryopreservation and thawing, the number of spermatozoa per sperm dose decreases. This also necessitates semen with high quality parameters. One of the key stages of the standard processing of cryopreserved bovine semen prior to artificial insemination is the thawing procedure. Therefore, cryopreservation and thawing procedures should be optimized with regard to the proposed modifications of these methods and the changing reproductive abilities of animals. In our study, we compared the effects of previously recommended thawing protocols and those proposed by us on the safety of spermatozoa of Russian Holstein sires and identified the modes that reliably provide a prolonged positive effect on the quality characteristics of spermatozoa and better preservation of their viability after thawing. The semen of 6-7 year-old Holstein bulls was cryopreserved in polypropylene straws (72 doses) with the use of the IMV Technology equipment (France) and in uncoated pellets (90 doses) on the dry ice plates according to GOST State Standard 26030-2015 and the National Technology for Freezing and Handling Semen of Pedigree Bull Sires. Thus, 162 semen doses 0.25 ml each were analyzed. The sperm motility and movement velocity parameters were assessed immediately and after in vitro post-thawed incubation for 5 to 24 hours at 38 °С. The percentage of motile semen was visually assessed with the Olympus microscope CX41 (Japan) at ×150 magnification. Thereafter, in the same samples the motility (%), the number of the highly motile sperm (%), and the sperm velocity (mcm/sec) were automatically measured with the SFA-500 Sperm Analyzer (Biola Company, Ltd, Russia). The dynamic of thawing temperature up to the final value was measured with the Center 304 thermocouple. It has been ascertained that the effects of different procedures used for thawing straws and pellets are quite steady and approximately the same. However, the best results of the male sex cell survival after the long in-vitro incubation period (for 24 hours at the animal body temperature of 38 °С) are in the samples thawed in a water bath at 38 °С for 10 sec when compared to those for the other methods (p < 0.001).

Keywords: Holsteins, sperm, thawing procedure, motility, sperm velocity, straws, uncoated pellets.

 

Full article (Rus)

Full article (Eng)

 

REFERENCES

  1. Iolchiev B.S., Abilov A.I., Tadzhieva A.V., Bagirov V.A., Nasibov Sh.N., Shaidullin I.N., Klenovitskii P.M., Kombarova N.A., Zhilinskii M.A. Biological integrity of bison epididymal sperm under cryoconservation and long storage. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2017, 52(2): 282-290 CrossRef
  2. Amstislavskii S.Ya., Brusentsev E.Yu., Abramova T.O., Ragaeva D.S., Rozhkova I.N., Igonina T.N., Kizilova E.A., Naprimerov V.A., Feoktistova N.Yu. Vavilovskii zhurnal genetiki i selektsii, 2015, 19(4): 367-371 CrossRef (in Russ)
  3. Evdokimov V.V., Erokhin A.S., Aibyatov  D.T., Erasova V.I. Andrologiya i genital'naya khirurgiya, 2012, 1: 21-25 (in Russ.).
  4. Aungier S.P., Roche J.F., Diskin M.G., Crowe M.A. Risk factors that affect reproductive target achievement in fertile dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 2014, 97(6): 472-387 CrossRef
  5. Galli C. Achievements and unmet promises of assisted reproduction technologies in large animals: a personal perspective. Anim. Reprod., 2017, 14(3): 614-621 CrossRef
  6. Kononov V.P. Farm Animals, 2015, 1: 40-47 (in Russ.).
  7. Reshetnikova N.M., Eskin G.V., Kombarova N.A., Poroshina E.S., Shavyrin I.I. Problemy biologii produktivnykh zhivotnykh, 2011, spetsvypusk 4: 116-121 (in Russ.).
  8. Kombarova N.A., Malinovskii A.M., Popov E.G. Problemy biologii produktivnykh zhivotnykh, 2011, spetsvypusk 4: 53-57 (in Russ.).
  9. Atroshchenko M.M., Kalashnikov V.V., Bragina E.E., Zaitsev A.M. Comparative study of the structural integrity of spermatozoa in epididymal, ejaculated and cryopreserved semen of stallions. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2017, 52(2): 274-280 CrossRef
  10. Bailey J.L., Blodeau J., Cormier N. Semen cryopreservation in domestic animals: a damaging and capacitating phenomenon minireview. Journal of Andrology, 2000, 21(1): 1-7 CrossRef
  11. Kostyaev A.A., Martusevich A.K., Andreev A.A. Nauchnoe obozrenie. Meditsinskie nauki, 2016, 6: 54-74 (in Russ.)
  12. Dalal J., Kumar A., Dutt R., Singh G., Chandolia R.K. Different cooling rate for cryopreservation of semen in various livestock species: a review. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 2018, 7: 1903-1911 CrossRef
  13. Ansari M.S., Rakha B.A., Andrabi S.M.H., Akhter S. Effect of straw size and thawing time on quality of cryopreserved buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) semen. Reproductive Biology, 2011, 11(1): 49-54 CrossRef
  14. Miranda M., Kulíková B., Vašícek J., Olexiková L., Iaffaldano N., Chrenek P. Effect of cryoprotectants and thawing temperatures on chicken sperm quality. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 2018, 53(1): 93-100 CrossRef
  15. Rall W., Reid D., Farrant J. Innocuous biological freezing during warming. Nature (Lond.), 1980, 286: 511-514.
  16. Taylor M., Bank H., Benton M. Selective destruction of leucocytes by freezing as a potential means of modulating tissue immunogenicity: membrane integrity of lymphocytes and macrophages. Cryobiology, 1987, 24(2): 91-102 CrossRef
  17. Ostashko F.N. Biotekhnologiya vosproizvedeniya krupnogo rogatogo skota [Biotechnology of cattle reproduction]. Kiev, 1995 (in Russ.)
  18. Ozkavukcu S., Erdemli E., Isik A., Oztuna D., Karahuseyinoglu S. Effects of cryopreservation on sperm parameters and ultrastructural morphology of human spermatozoa. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 2008, 25(8): 403-411 CrossRef
  19. Frenau G.E., Chenoveth H.J., Elis R., Rupp G. Sperm morphology of beef bulls evaluated ted by two deferent method. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 2010, 118: 176-181 CrossRef
  20. Walczak-Jedrzejowska R., Wolski J.K., Slowikowska-Hilczer J. The role of oxidative stress and antioxidants in male fertility. Central European Journal of Urology, 2013, 66: 60-67 CrossRef
  21. Yániz J.L., Capistrós S., Vicente-Fiel S., Hidalgo C.O., Santolaria P. A comparative study of the morphometry sperm head components in cattle, sheep, and pigs with a computer-assisted fluorescence method. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2016, 18: 840-843 CrossRef
  22. Banaszewska D., Andraszek K., Czubaszek M., Biesiada-Drzazga B. The effect of selected staining techniques on bull sperm morphometry. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 2015, 159: 17-24 CrossRef
  23. Soler C., Cooper T.G., Valverde A., Yániz J.L. Afterword to Sperm morphometrics today and tomorrow special issue in Asian Journal of Andrology. Asian Journal of Andrology, 2016, 18: 895-897 CrossRef
  24. Yaniz J.L., Santolaria P., Marco Aguado Lopez-Gatius F. Use of image analysis to assess the plasma membrane integrity of ram spermatozoa in different diluents. Theriogenology, 2008, 70(2): 192-198 CrossRef
  25. Soler K., Valverde A., Bombart D., Ferdeindonfar S., Sancho M., Yaniz  Kh.L., Garsiya-Molina A., Korneenko-Zhilyaev Yu.A. New methods of semen analysis by CASA (somputer-assisted sperm analysis). Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2017, 52(2): 232-241 CrossRef
  26. Kombarova N.A., Zhavoronkova N.V., Malinovskii A.M., Popov E.G. Praktik, 2010, 2: 56-61 (in Russ.).
  27. Kononov V.P., Chernykh V.Ya. Biotekhnika reproduktsii v molochnom skotovodstve [Biotechnology of reproduction in dairy cattle breeding]. Moscow, 2009 (in Russ.).
  28. Rastegarnia A.R., Shahverdi A.H., Rezaei Topraggaleh T., Ebrahimi B., Shafipour V. Effect of different thawing rates on post-thaw viability, kinematic parameters and chromatin structure of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) spermatozoa. Cell J., 2013; 14(4): 306-313.
  29. Muiño R., Rivera M.M., Rigau T., Rodriguez-Gil J.E., Peña A.I. Effect of different thawing rates on post-thaw sperm viability, kinematic parameters and motile sperm subpopulations structure of bull semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 2008, 109(1-4): 50-64 CrossRef
  30. Calamera J.C., Buffone M.G., Doncel G.F., Brugo-Olmedo S., de Vincentiis S., Calamera M.M., Storey B.T., Alvarez J.G. Effect of thawing temperature on the motility recovery of cryopreserved human spermatozoa Fertil. Steril., 2010, 93(3): 789-794 CrossRef
  31. Anwar M., Andrabi S.M., Mehmood A., Ullah N. Effect of low temperature thawing on the motility and fertility of cryopreserved water buffalo and zebu bull semen. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 2008, 32(6): 413-416.
  32. Marin-Briggiler C.I., Tezon J.G., Miranda P.V., Vazquez-Levin M.H. Effect of incubating human sperma at room temperature on capacitation-related events. Fertil. Steril., 2002, 77(2): 252-259 CrossRef
  33. Suarez S.S. Formation of a reservoir of sperm in the oviduct. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2002, 37(3): 140-142 CrossRef
  34. Payan-Carreira R., Borges P., Mir F., Fontbonne A. Molecular markers in sperm analysis, success in artificial insemination. Alemayehu Lemma, IntechOpen, January 9th 2013 CrossRef Available https://www.intechopen.com/books/success-in-artificial-insemination-quality-of-semen-and-diagnostics-employed/molecular-markers-in-sperm-analysis. No date.
  35. Bergeron A., Ménard M. Major proteins of bovine seminal plasma bind to the low-density lipoprotein fraction of hen’s egg yolk. Biol. Reprod., 2002, 67: 1250-1258
  36. Röpkea T., Oldenhofb H., Leidingc C., Siemeb H., Bollweina H., Wolkersd W.F. Liposomes for cryopreservation of bovine sperm. Theriogenology, 2011, 76(8): 1465-1472 CrossRef

back