doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2018.6.1120eng

UDC 619:579.61/.63

 

MICROBIOLOGICAL RISKS RELATED TO THE INDUSTRIAL
POULTRY AND ANIMAL PRODUCTION (review)

V.I. Fisinin1, V.I. Trukhachev2, I.P. Saleeva1, V.Yu. Morozov2,
E.V. Zhuravchuk1, R.O. Kolesnikov2, A.V. Ivanov1

1Federal Scientific Center All-Russian Research and Technological Poultry Institute RAS, 10, ul. Ptitsegradskaya, Sergiev Posad, Moscow Province, 141311 Russia, e-mail saleeva@vnitip.ru (✉ corresponding author), vnitip@vnitip.ru, evgeniy_20.02@mail.ru, ivanovalexander1965@gmail.ru
2Stavropol State Agrarian University, 12, per. Zootechnicheskii, Stavropol, 355017 Russia, e-mail inf@stqau.ru, supermoroz@mail.ru, roman-koles@bk.ru

ORCID:
Fisinin V.I. orcid.org/0000-0003-0081-6336
Trukhachev V.I. orcid.org/0000-0003-4676-5407
Saleeva I.P. orcid.org/0000-0002-7446-1593
Morozov V.Yu. orcid.org/0000-0002-3688-1546
Zhuravchuk E.V. orcid.org/0000-0002-2951-0659
Kolesnikov R.O. orcid.org/0000-0002-2182-2383
Ivanov A.V. orcid.org/0000-0001-5021-2552
The authors declare no conflict of interests

Received June 25, 2017

 

The intensive poultry and animal farming generate substantial amounts of bioaerosols, dust, and harmful gases entering the environment daily, which pollutes the adjacent area with the radius ca. 3 km (M.V. Vlasov et al., 2010). Average dust load in the air of a poultry house can reach 10 mg/m3 (M. Saleh et al., 2014), with median concentration of endotoxins reaching 257.6 ng/m3 (K. Radon et al., 2002). Microbial load in the deposited dust can reach 3.2×109 CFU/m3, fungal load is 1.2×106 CFU/m3 (J. Skora et al., 2016). Concentrations of mesophilic bacteria in the air can reach 8.8×104 CFU/m3 in an animal house (E. Karwowska, 2005) and 1.89×108 CFU/m3 in a poultry house (K. Roque et al., 2016). Microbial population in the air within the premises for cattle growing can include pathogenic strains Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus faecalis, Escherichia coli, Candida spp., Aspergillus spp. (V.Yu. Morozov et al., 2016). A bioaerosol in a poultry house can contain different species from genera Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Corynebacterium, Pasteurella, Vibrio, Enterobacter, Salmonella, Brucella, Leptospira, Haemophilus, Mycoplasma, Yersinia, Staphyloccocus, Streptococcus, Micrococcus, Pantoea, Sarcina (Е. Lonc et al., 2010). In the air of poultry houses over 30 microbial species were identified including 13 fungal species dominated by Aspergillus and Penicillium species (A. Lugauskas et al., 2004). Concentrations of aerobic fungi were found to vary from 4.4×103 to 6.2×105 CFU/m3 (V. Agranovski et al., 2007). Inhalation of large amounts of this bioaerosol by farm personnel can promote respiratory inflammations, asthma, various allergic responces (B. Bakutis et al., 2004; D. Pomorska et al., 2009; L.A. Melnikova et al., 2009). Dust mites are among the most active allergen in poultry production (Е. Lonc et al., 2010). Over 20 % of farm personnel were reported to complain about the work-related symptoms of respiratory diseases (J. Hartung et al., 2007). The acute enteric infections (colibacteriosis, salmonellosis) is another important problem for the poultry production. High flock densities in the intensive production systems and especially different technological disruptions can lead to the emergence and transmission of diseases affecting livability and productivity of animals (O.R. Ilyasov et al., 2017). In these conditions a constant risk of the outbreaks of infectious diseases which can affect the whole flock is inevitable; the risk of the transmission of zoonotic diseases to humans is therefore high (A.G. Vozmilov et al., 2013). Occasionally the outbreaks of the diseases hazardous for human occur: bovine tuberculosis, rabies, leptospirosis, brucellosis, anthrax. Therefore, modern methods of poultry and animal production are of potential risk for the health status in animals and poultry and in the farm personnel while contamination of the adjacent air space can compromise the welfare of the habitants. Disinfection and decontamination methods, such as aerosol and UV disinfection, filtration of supply and exhaust air should be used to minimize these risks.

Keywords: animal production, poultry production, bioaerosol, pathogenic microflora, microorganisms, fungi, viruses, dust load, infectious diseases, air pollution, air medium.

 

Full article (Rus)

Full article (Eng)

 

REFERENCES

  1. Il'yasov O.R., Neverova O.P., Zueva G.V., Sharav'ev P.V. Vestnik YuurGU. Seriya: Pishchevye i biotekhnologii, 2017, 5(3): 59-65 (in Russ.).
  2. Radon K., Danuser B., Iversen M., Monso E., Weber C., Hartung J., Donham K., Palmgren U., Nowak D. Air contaminants in different European farming environments. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med., 2002, 9(1): 41-48.
  3. Bakutis B., Monstviliene E., Januskeviciene G. Analyses of airborne contamination with bacteria, endotoxins and dust in livestock barns and poultry houses. Acta Vet. Brno, 2004, 73: 283-289 CrossRef
  4. Plewa K., Lonc E. Analysis of airborne contamination with bacteria and moulds in poultry farming: a case study. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 2011, 20(3): 725-731.
  5. Schulze A., van Strien R., Ehrenstein V., Schierl R., Küchenhoff H., Radon K. Ambient endotoxin level in an area with intensive livestock production. Ann. Agr. Env. Med., 2006, 13(1): 87-91.
  6. Gosmanov R.G., Volkov A.KH., Galiullin A.K., Ibragimova A.I. Sanitarnaya mikrobiologiya [Sanitary microbiology]. St. Petersburg, 2017 (in Russ.).
  7. Kostadinova G., Petrokov G., Denev S., Miteva Ch., Stefanova R., Penev T. Microbial pollution of manure, litter, air and soil in a poultry farm. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 2014, 20(1): 56-65.
  8. Millner P. Bioaerosols associated with animal production operations. Bioresource Technol., 2009, 100(22): 5379-5385 CrossRef
  9. Krainov Ya.V., Federyakina D.V., Parshin P.A. Sbornik trudov mezhdunarodnoikonferentsii «Veterinarno-sanitarnye aspekty kachestva i bezopasnosti sel'skokhozyaistvennoi produktsii» [Proc. Int. Conf. “Veterinry and sanitation aspects of food quality and safety”]. Voronezh, 2015: 44-46 (in Russ.).
  10. Vil'danov R.Kh. Veterinarnyi vrach, 2003, 4: 30-32 (in Russ.).
  11. Brigadirov Yu.N. V sbornike: Ekologicheskie aspekty epizootologii i patologii zhivotnykh [Ecological aspects of animal epizootology and pathology]. Voronezh, 1999: 147-149 (in Russ.).
  12. Vlasov M.V., Vozmilov A.G. Vestnik CHGAA, 2010, 56: 29-31 (in Russ.).
  13. Hartung J., Schulz J. Risks caused by bio-aerosols in poultry houses. Poultry in the 21st century — Avian influenza and beyond. Bangkok, FAO, 2007. Available http://www.fao.org/ag/AGA-info/var/www/events/bangkok2007/docs/part2/2_10.pdf. No date.
  14. Dmitriev A.F., Morozov V.Yu. Issledovanie mikrobnoi obsemenennosti vozdukha zhivotnovodcheskikh pomeshchenii: metodicheskie rekomendatsii [Assessment of the microbial contamination of air in livestock buildings: guidelines]. Stavropol', 2005 (in Russ.).
  15. Jerez S.B., Cheng Y., Bray J. Exposure of workers to dust and bioaerosol on a poultry farm. J. Appl. Poultry Res., 2014, 23: 7-14 CrossRef
  16. Mel'nikova L.A., Shedikova O.E., Yanetskaya S.A. Zdorov'e i okruzhayushchaya sreda, 2009, 14: 384-387 (in Russ.).
  17. Zabrovskaya A.V., Kaftyreva L.A., Egorova S.A., Selivanova L.V., Malysheva L.Yu., Antipova N.A., Borisenkova A.N., Novikova O.B. Mezhdunarodnyi vestnik vetirinarii, 2011, 3: 15-18 (in Russ.).
  18. Stepkin Yu.I., Ishchenko L.M., Kameneva O.V. Nauchno-meditsinskii vestnik Tsentral'nogo Chernozem'ya, 2014, 57: 57-61 (in Russ.).
  19. Kochish I. Ptitsefabrika, 2007, 6: 26-28 (in Russ.).
  20. Trawi?ska B., Polonis A., Tymczyna L., Popio?ek-Pyrz M., Bombik T., Saba L. Bacteriological and parasitological pollution of the environment and birth health state around the reproductive layer farm. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie Sk?odowska, 2006, 24: 371-376.
  21. Viegas S., Faísca V.M., Dias H., Clérigo A., Carolino E., Viegas C. Occupational exposure to poultry dust and effects on the respiratory system in workers. J. Toxicol. Env. Heal. A, 2013, 76(4-5): 230-239 CrossRef
  22. Skóra J., Matusiak K., Wojewódzki P., Nowak A., Sulyok M., Ligocka A., Okrasa M., Hermann J., Gutarowska B. Evaluation of microbiological and chemical contaminants in poultry farms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2016, 13(2): 192 CrossRef
  23. Saleh M., Seedorf J., Hartung J. Inhalable and respirable dust, bacteria and endotoxins in the air of poultry houses. Available http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/
    download?doi=10.1.1.566.8137&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed  December 14, 2018.
  24. Lawniczek-Walczyk A., Górny R.L., Golofit-Szymczak M., Niesler A., Wlazlo A. Occupational exposure to airborne microorganisms, endotoxins and β-glucans in poultry houses at different stages of the production cycle. Ann. Agr. Env. Med., 2013, 20(2): 259-268.
  25. Roque K., Lim G.D., Jo J.H., Shin K.M., Song E.S., Gautam R., Kim C.Y., Lee K., Shin S., Yoo H.S., Heo Y., Kim H.A. Epizootiological characteristics of viable bacteria and fungi in indoor air from porcine, chicken, or bovine husbandry confinement buildings. J. Vet. Sci., 2016, 17(4): 531-538 CrossRef
  26. Schierl R., Heise A., Egger U., Schneider F., Eichelser R., Neser S., Nowak D. Endotoxin concentration in modern animal houses in southern Bavaria. Ann. Agr. Env. Med., 2007, 14(1): 129-136.
  27. Roque K., Shin K.M., Jo J.H., Kim H.A., Heo Y. Relationship between chicken cellular immunity and endotoxin levels in dust from chicken housing environments. J. Vet. Sci., 2015, 16(2): 173-177 CrossRef
  28. Arkhipchenko N.A. Veterinariya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh, 2009, 11: 69-70 (in Russ.).
  29. Parshin P.A., Krainov Ya.V., Shaforostova E.A. Materialy III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii  «Proizvodstvo i pererabotka sel'skokhozyaistvennoi produktsii: menedzhment kachestva i bezopasnosti» [Proc. III Int. Conf. „Production and processing of agricultural products: quality and safety management”]. Voronezh, 2015: 103-106 (in Russ.).
  30. Baev V., Bocharov M. Ptitsevodstvo, 2008, 1: 36-37 (in Russ.).
  31. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po tekhnicheskomu proektirovaniyu ptitsevodcheskikh predpriyatii RD-APK 1.10.05.04-13 /Pod redaktsiei N.A. Butsko [Guidelines for the technical design of poultry enterprises.  N.A. Butsko (ed.)]. Moscow, 2013 (in Russ.).
  32. Karwowska E. Microbiological air contamination in farming environment. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 2005, 14(4): 445-449.
  33. Morozov V.Yu., Sytnik D.A., Agarkov A.V. Vestnik APK Stavropol'ya, 2016, 1(21): 73-76 (in Russ.).
  34. Vucemilo M., Matkovic K., Vinkovic B., Jakšic S., Granic K., Mas N. The effect of animal age on air pollutant concentration in a broiler house. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 2007, 52(6): 170-174.
  35. Vucemilo M., Vinkovic B., Matkovic K. Influence of broilers age on airborne pollutants content in poultry house. Krmiva, 2006, 48(1): 3-6.
  36. Northcutt J.K., Jones D.R., Musgrove M.T. Airborne microorganisms during the commercial production and processing of Japanese quail. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2004, 3(4): 242-247 CrossRef
  37. Bródka K., Kozajda A., Buczynska A., Szadkowska-Stanczyk I. The variability of bakterial aerosol in poultry houses depending on selected factors. Int. J. Occup. Med. Env., 2012, 25(3): 281-293 CrossRef
  38. Lonc E., Plewa K. Microbiological air contamination in poultry houses. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 2010, 19(1): 15-19.
  39. Gotovskii D.G. Zootekhnicheskaya nauka Belarusi, 2004, 39: 354-357 (in Russ.).
  40. Borisenkova A. Ptitsevodstvo, 2013, 10: 43-45 (in Russ.).
  41. Yu G., Wang Y., Wang Sh., Duan C., Wei L., Gao J., Chai T., Cai Y. Effects of microbial aerosol in poultry house on meat ducks' immune function. Front. Microbiol., 2016, 7: 1245 CrossRef
  42. Agranovski V., Reponen T., Ristovski Z.D. Survey of bioaerosol emissions from Australian poultry buildings. European Aerosol Conference. Salzburg, 2007. Available http://www.gaef.de/EAC2007/EAC2007abstracts../T04Abstractpdf/T04A003.pdf. No date.
  43. Kasprzyk I. Aeromycology — main research fields of interest during the last 25 years. Ann. Agr. Env. Med., 2008, 15(1): 1-7.
  44. Sowiak M., Bródka K., Kozajda A., Buczy?ska A., Szadkowska-Sta?czyk I. Fungal aerosol in the process of poultry breeding — quantitative and qualitative analysis. Med. Pr., 2012, 63(1): 1-10.
  45. Shokri H. Investigation on mycoflora of poultry breeding houses’ air and studying the efficacy of spraying and fumigation on inactivating the airspora. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2016, 10(1): 19-26 CrossRef
  46. Lugauskas A., Krikstaponis A., Sveistyte L. Airborne fungi in industrial environments-potential agents of respiratory diseases. Ann. Agr. Env. Med., 2004, 11(1): 19-25.
  47. Bayanov E.I., Artamonova V.G. Meditsinskii akademicheskii zhurnal, 2004, 2(2): 115-125 (in Russ.).
  48. Sheina N.I. Toksikologicheskii vestnik, 2009, 5: 19-22 (in Russ.).
  49. Crook B., Easterbrook A., Stagg S. Exposure to dust and bioaerosols in poultry farming. Summary of observations and data. Health and Safety Executive, 2008. Available http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/rrpdf/rr655.pdf. No date.
  50. Pomorska D., Larsson L., Skórska C., Sitkowska J., Dutkiewicz J. Levels of bacterial endotoxins in the samples of settled dust collected in animal houses. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy, 2009, 53(1): 37-41.
  51. Nevalainen A. Bio-aerosols as exposure agents in indoor environments in relation to asthma and allergy. Finland, 2007. Available http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/
    download?doi=10.1.1.561.4142&rep=rep1&type=pdf. No date.
  52. Vozmilov A.G., Zvezdakova O.V. Vestnik CHGAA, 2013, 66: 14-24 (in Russ.).
  53. Tomley F.M., Shirley M.W. Livestock infectious diseases and zoonoses. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 2009, 364: 2637-2642 CrossRef
  54. Kowalski W.J., Bahnfleth W.P., Carey D.D. Engineering control of airborne disease transmission in animal laboratories. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim., 2002, 41(3): 9-17.
  55. Epizooticheskaya situatsiya v RF. Federal'naya sluzhba po veterinarnomu i fitosanitarnomu nadzoru (Rossel'khoznadzor), 2007-2017. Available http://www.fsvps.ru/fsvps/iac/rf/reports.html. Accessed January 18, 2018.
  56. Chinivasagam H.N., Tran T., Maddock L., Gale A., Blackall P.J. Mechanically ventilated broiler sheds :a possible source of aerosolized Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microb., 2009, 75(23): 7417-7425 CrossRef
  57. Matkovi? K., Vucemilo M., Vinkovi B., Seol B., Pavici Z., Tofant A., Matkovi? S. Effect of microclimate on bacterial count and airborne emission from dairy barns on the environment. Ann. Agr. Env. Med., 2006, 13(2): 349-354.
  58. Jacobson L.D., Bicudo J.R., Schmidt D.R., Wood-Gay S., Gates R.S., Hoff S.J. Air emissions from animal production. ISAH 2003, Mexico. Available https://pdfs.semanticscho-lar.org/2353/c7d276ab589c0238ac9ea7f6c861d0ec4abb.pdf. No date.
  59. Kotylev O. Veterinariya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh, 2011, 8: 49-50 (in Russ.).
  60. Sklyarov O.D. Veterinariya Kubani, 2011, 6: 11-17 (in Russ.).
  61. Mezentsev S.V., Telegin N.G. BIO, 2004, 10: 5-8 (in Russ.). 
  62. Vinokurov V.Yu., Malysheva L.A. Vestnik veterinarii, 2006, 39(4): 51-53 (in Russ.).
  63. Omer M.M., Abusalab S.M., Gumaa M.M., Mulla S.A., Omer E.A., Jeddah I.E., Al-Hassan A.M., Hussein M.A., Ahmed A.M. Outbreak of colibacillosis among broiler and layer flocks in intensive and semi intensive poultry farms in Kassala State, Eastern Sudan. Asian Journal of Poultry Science, 2010, 4(4): 173-181 CrossRef
  64. Kabir S.M.L. Avian solibacillosis and salmonellosis: a closer look at epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, control and public health concerns. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 2010, 7(1): 89-114 CrossRef
  65. Rozhdestvenskaya T.N. Rossiiskii veterinarnyi zhurnal. Sel'skokhozyaistvennye zhivotnye, 2008, 1: 40-42 (in Russ.).
  66. Vandeplas S., Dubois Dauphin R., Beckers Y., Thonart P., Théwis A. Salmonella in chicken: current and developing strategies to reduce contamination at farm level. J. Food Prot., 2010, 73(4): 774-85.
  67. Soliman S.E., Reddy P.G., Sobeih A.A.M., Busby H., Rowe E.S. Epidemiological surveillance on environmental contaminants in poultry farms. International Journal of Poultry Science, 2009, 8(2): 151-155 CrossRef

back