doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2017.6.1244eng

UDC 636.52/.58:619: 616-074

 

INVASIVE AND NONINVASIVE DETECTION OF ADAPTIVE RESPONSE
IN MEAT POULTRY AFTER PREVENTIVE APPLICATION OF
A STRESS-PROTECTIVE ANTIOXIDANT COMPOSITION

V.I. Fisinin1, A.V. Miftakhutdinov2, E.M. Amineva2

1Federal Scientific Center All-Russian Research and Technological Poultry Institute RAS, Federal Agency of Scientific Organizations,10, ul. Ptitsegradskaya, Sergiev Posad, Moscow Province, 141315 Russia, e-mail fisinin@land.ru;
2South Ural State Agrarian University, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, 13. ul. Gagarina, Troitsk, Chelyabinsk Province, 457100  Russia, e-mail nirugavm@mail.ru (corresponding author A.V. Miftakhutdinov)


ORCID:
Fisinin V.I. orcid.org/0000-0003-0081-6336
Miftakhutdinov A.V. orcid.org/0000-0001-8496-2810

Received March 2, 2017

 

Prevention of technological stress among chickens at commercial faring is an important task but the methods for evaluating effectiveness of these measures in using pharmacological agents have not yet been developed. A method has been developed to diagnose the stressful conditions in commercial stock herds that makes it possible to control physiological state of chickens via corticosterone detection in poultry manure. The method is used to assess development of nonspecific adaptive response in chickens under the influence of various technological factors without direct impact on the body. Here, in farm trails of pharmacological prevention of stresses under intensive poultry production we first proved that the non-invasive assay of corticosterone level in manure extracts may estimate an adaptive response in chickens after technological stress. The SPAO complex (Stress-Protector Antioxidant, a pharmacological composition developed at the Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, South Ural State University) was used as an anti-stress agent. SPAO active complex contains lithium citrate, vitamins, vitamin-like substances etc. that affect metabolism. Blood and poultry manure samples were collected from the Hubbard F15 crossbred chickens during the transfer from the section of rearing flocks to the adult herd at 120 day-old poultry (group 1 of 12371 females and 1246 males, and control group of 12865 females and 1255 males). SPAO complex increased viability in the herd up to 4.6 %, egg production up to 2.53 %, average hatching up to 2.28 % and decrease feed costs per broiler chick on average by 16.0 % (presumably due to the direct effect of the components of the complex on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system). Pharmacological prevention of stresses allowed to extend economic use of hens in the experimental group for 2 weeks, to increase the gross yield of eggs up to 12.4 pcs whereas an earlier depletion of the productive performance occurred in the control group. In use of SPAO complex blood corticosterone level decreased 2.7 times and corticosterone in extracts of poultry manure was 22.3 % lower. Corticosterone levels in hen blood and the extracts from manure showed statistically significant correlations both before stressing (r = 0.89, p < 0.05) and after stressing (r = 0.68, p < 0.05) which indicates a high reliability of the proposed noninvasive method of stress diagnostics to estimate the effectiveness of pharmacological prevention of stress in industrial poultry.

Keywords: stress in chickens, pharmacological prophylaxis of stress, industrial poultry production, SPAO-complex, diagnostics of stress, non-specific adaptation reactions.

 

Full article (Rus)

Full article (Eng)

 

REFERENCES

  1. Fisinin V.I., Surai P.F., Kuznetsov A.I., Miftakhutdinov A.V., Terman A.A. Stressy i stressovaya chuvstvitel'nost' kur v myasnom ptitsevodstve. Diagnostika i profilaktika [Stresses and stress-sentitivity in meat hens in commercial poultry]. Troitsk, 2013 (in Russ.).
  2. Kochish I.I., Lukicheva V.A., Pen'shina E.Yu., Gumarov M.Kh. Doklady RASKHN, 2009, 6: 47-49 (in Russ.).
  3. Vizzier Thaxton Y., Christensen K.D., Mench J.A., Rumley E.R., Daugherty C., Feinberg B., Parker M., Siegel P., Scanes C.G. Symposium: Animal welfare challenges for today and tomorrow. Poultry Sci., 2016, 95(9): 2198-2207 CrossRef
  4. Kavtarashvili A.Sh., Kolokol'nikova T.N. Physiology and productivity of poultry under stress (review). Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2010, 4: 25-37 (in Russ.).
  5. Miftakhutdinov A.V. Experimental approaches to stress diagnostics in poultry (review). Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2014, 2: 20-30 (in Russ.).
  6. Fisinin V.I., Mudryi I.N., Kravchenko N.A. Doklady VASKHNIL, 1975, 8: 26-29 (in Russ.).
  7. Blokhuis H.J., Van Niekerk T.F., Bessei W., Elson A., Guemene D., Kjaer J.B., Levrino G.A.M., Nicol C.J., Tauson R., Weeks C.A., De Weerd H.A.V. Welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens. World’s Poultry Sci. J., 2007, 63(1): 101-114 CrossRef
  8. Cotter P.F. An examination of the utility of heterophil-lymphocyte ratios in assessing stress of caged hens. Poultry Sci., 2015, 94(3): 512-517 CrossRef
  9. Ralph C.R., Hemsworth P.H., Leury B.J., Tilbrook A.J. Relationship between plasma and tissue corticosterone in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus): implications for stress physiology and animal welfare. Domest. Anim. Endocrin., 2015, 50: 72-82 CrossRef
  10. Cockrem J. Stress, corticosterone responses and avian personalities. J. Ornithol., 2007, 148(Suppl. 2): 169-178 CrossRef
  11. Braw-Tal R., Yossefi S., Pen S., Shinder D., Bar A. Hormonal changes associated with ageing and induced moulting of domestic hens. Brit. Poultry Sci., 2004, 45(6): 815-822 CrossRef
  12. Tikhonov S., Miftakhutdinov A. Diagnostics of hens stresses in poultry industry. Global Veterinaria, 2014, 12(6): 750-755 CrossRef
  13. Ferrante V., Mugnai C., Ferrari L., Marelli S., Spagnoli E., Lolli S. Stress and reactivity in three Italian chicken breeds. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 2016, 15(2): 303-309 CrossRef
  14. Wein Y., Bar Shira E., Friedman A. Avoiding handling-induced stress in poultry: use of uniform parameters to accurately determine physiological stress. Poultry Sci., 2017, 96(1): 65-73 CrossRef
  15. Sun-Young K., Young-Hyun K., Yang-Soo M., Sea-Hwan S., In-Surk J. Effects of the combined stress induced by stocking density and feed restriction on hematological and cytokine parameters as stress indicators in laying hens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 2011, 24(3): 414-420 CrossRef
  16. Nigel J. Minimally invasive sampling media and the measurement of corticosteroids as biomarkers of stress in animals. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 2012, 92(3): 227-259 CrossRef
  17. Scanes C.G. Biology of stress in poultry with emphasis on glucocorticoids and the heterophil to lymphocyte ratio. Poultry Sci., 2016, 95(9): 2208-2215 CrossRef
  18. Alm M., Holm L., Tauson R., Wall H. Corticosterone metabolites in laying hen droppings — effects of fiber enrichment, genotype, and daily variations. Poultry Sci., 2014, (93)10: 2615-2621 CrossRef
  19. Miftakhutdinov A.V., Ponomarenko V.V., Anosov D.E. Sposob opredeleniya stressovogo sostoyaniya kur myasnogo napravleniya produktivnosti. Pat. 2473215 Rossiiskaya Federatsiya, MPK A01K67/02 (2006.01). Zayavl. 18.05.2011. Opubl. 27.01.2013. Byul. № 8 [Estimation of stress status in meat hens. Patent RF 2473215, MPK A01K67/02 (2006.01). Appl. 18.05.2011. Publ. 27.01.2013. Bul. № 8] (in Russ.).
  20. Fisinin V.I., Miftakhutdinov A.V., Ponomarenko V.V., Anosov D.E. Agrarnyi vestnik Urala, 2015, 12: 54-58 (in Russ.).
  21. Surai P.F., Fisinin V.I. Vitagenes in poultry production: Part 1. Technological and environmental stresses. World’s Poultry Sci. J., 2016, 72(4): 721-734 CrossRef
  22. Surai P.F., Fisinin V.I.  Vitagenes in poultry production: Part 2. Nutritional and internal stresses. World’s Poultry Sci. J., 2016, 72(4): 761-772 CrossRef
  23. Garkavi L.Kh., Kvakina E.B, Kuz'menko T.S. Antistressornye reaktsii i aktivatsionnaya terapiya [Anti-stress response and activation therapy]. Moscow, 1998 (in Russ.).
  24. Derkho M.A, Sereda T.I. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2015, 6: 255-258 (in Russ.).
  25. Fisinin V.I., Kravchenko N.A. Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 1979, 2: 191-194 (in Russ.).

back