doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2017.6.1226eng

UDC 636.52/.58:591.1

Acknowledgements:
Supported by Russian Science Foundation (science project 16-16-04089)

 

ACTIVITY OF DIGESTIVE ENZYMES IN DUODENAL CHYMUS AND
BLOOD IN BROILERS OF PARENTAL LINES AND THE MEAT
CROSS DEPENDING ON DIETARY BIOACTIVE ADDITIVES

V.I. Fisinin, I.A. Egorov, V.G. Vertiprakhov, A.A. Grozina, T.N. Lenkova,
V.A. Manukyan, T.A. Egorova

Federal Scientific Center All-Russian Research and Technological Poultry Institute RAS, Federal Agency of Scientific Organizations,10, ul. Ptitsegradskaya, Sergiev Posad, Moscow Province, 141315 Russia, e-mail alena_fisinina@mail.ru, vertiprakhov63@mail.ru (corresponding author)


ORCID:
Fisinin V.I. orcid.org/0000-0003-0081-6336
Egorov I.A. orcid.org/0000-0001-9122-9553
Vertiprakhov V.G. orcid.org/0000-0002-3240-7636
Grozina A.A. orcid.org/0000-0002-3088-0454
Lenkova T.N. orcid.org/0000-0001-8026-3983
Manukyan V.A. orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-4427
Egorova T.A. orcid.org/0000-0002-5102-2248

Received June 8, 2017

 

The achievement of maximal productivity in poultry requires knowledge of the genetic productivity potential and adjustment of nutrition according to bird’s physiological peculiarities. It is well established that early growth and development in poultry depend on the functional formation of the digestive system. Exocrine function of the pancreas plays one of the most important roles in this process. Earlier studies showed that the weight of the pancreas in broiler hybrid chicks is substantially higher compared to the parental lines till 35 days of age. Detailed comparative investigation of the corresponding distinctions in the digestion, however, requires physiological studies on fistulated chicks. The aim of the study presented was to determine and compare the activities of digestive enzymes in duodenal digesta and blood in hybrid broiler chicks (cross Smena 8) and in chicks of parental lines (Cornish and Plymouth Rock) when using bioadditives of several types, i.e. a spore forming probiotic, the mixture of low molecular weight organic acids, phytobiotic complex Intebio, feed additive with living bacteria (ООО Biotrof, Russia). It was found that amylase activity in the duodenal digesta was 22.0 % higher in the hybrid and 35.8 % higher in Cornish parental line as compared to Plymouth Rock line; lipase activity was higher 5.8- and 2.3-fold, respectively, due to the high dietary level of crude fat. The activity of proteases, however, was significantly lower in hybrids (by 9.0 %, p < 0.05) as compared to Plymouth Rock line and 32.3 % higher when compared to Cornish chicks (p < 0.001). The activity of blood amylolytic enzymes followed the reverse trend compared to the duodenal digesta; activity of other blood enzyme bore no differences between the genotypes. A diet formulation, as a proportion of protein, fat, and carbohydrates, can substantially influence the activity of the digestive enzymes in the intestinal lumen and in blood. Low molecular weight organic acids and the enzyme-based preparation in the diets for meat-type chicken stimulate activity of digestive enzymes in the duodenal digesta and blood with respect to the genotypic physiological peculiarities of the birds.

Keywords: intestinal digestion, digestive enzymes, blood pancreatic enzymes, broiler chicks, parental lines, meat cross, enzymes, probiotics, phytobiotics, organic acids.

 

Full article (Rus)

Full article (Eng)

 

REFERENCES

  1. Fisinin V.I. Materialy XVIII Mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii «Innovatsionnoe obespechenie yaichnogo i myasnogo ptitsevodstva Rossii» [Proc. XVIII Int. Conf. «Innovations in egg and meat poultry farming in Russia»]. Sergiev Posad, 2015: 9-25 (in Russ.).
  2. Somova O.V. Uchenye zapiski UO VGAVM, 2012, 1(48): 142-145 (in Russ.).
  3. Kyryliv B.Ya., Gunchak A.V. Vestnik Sumskogo natsional'nogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2016, 5: 170-174 (in Russ.).
  4. Egorov I.A., Vertiprakhov V.G., Lenkova T.N., Manukyan V.A., Grozi-na A.A., Egorova T.A. Ptitsevodstvo, 2017, 2: 23-29 (in Russ.).
  5. Vertiprakhov V.G., Grozina A.A., Andrianova E.N. Adaptation of pancreatic and intestinal proteases to dietary protein level in chicken. Proc. 21st European Symposiums on Poultry Nutrition. Salou—Vila-seca, Spain, 2017: 190.
  6. Batoev Ts.Zh., Batoeva S.Ts. Fiziologicheskii zhurnal SSSR, 1970, 56(12): 1867-1868 (in Russ.).
  7. Kokue E., Hayama T. Chronic pancreatic fistula in chicken. Jap. J. Zootech. Sci., 1971, 43(6): 340-341.
  8. Ren L.Q., Zhao F., Tan H.Z., Zhao J.T., Zhang J.Z., Zhang H.F. Effects of dietary protein source on the digestive enzyme activities and electrolyte composition in the small intestinal fluid of chickens. Poultry Sci., 2012, 91(7): 1641-1646 CrossRef
  9. Degolier T.F., Place A.R., Duke G.E., Carraway R.E. Neurotensin modulates the composition of pancreatic exocrine secretions in chickens. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 1999, 283: 455-462
  10. Ugolev A.M., Iezuitova N.N., Masevich Ts.G., Nadirova T.Ya.,  Timo-feeva N.M. Issledovanie pishchevaritel'nogo apparata u cheloveka. Leningrad, 1969 (in Russ.).
  11. Korot'ko G.F. Fizicheskaya kul'tura, sport — nauka i praktika, 2013, 1: 51-57 (in Russ.).
  12. Laporte J.C., Tremolieres J. Regulation hormonale de la sécrétion enzymatique du pancréas exocrine. Comptes rendus de l'Académie des Sciences. ser. D, 1971, 273: 1205-1207.
  13. Isenman L., Liebow C., Rothman S. The endocrine secretion of mammalian digestive enzymes by exocrine glands. Am. J. Physiol., 1999, 276: 223-232.
  14. Rothman S., Liebow C., Isenman L. Conservation of digestive enzymes. Phsyol. Rev., 2002, 82: 1-18 CrossRef
  15. Merina-Gluzkina V.M. Laboratornoe delo, 1965, 3: 142-146 (in Russ.).
  16. Batoev Ts.Zh. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov Buryatckogo SKHI (Ulan-Ude), 1971, 25: 122-126 (in Russ.).
  17. Mikhailova A.G., Khairullin R.F., Demidyuk I.V., Kostrov S.V., Grinberg N.V., Burova T.V., Grinberg V.Y., Rumsh L.D. Cloning, sequencing, expression, and characterization of  thermostability of oligopeptidase B from Serratia proteamaculans, a novel psychrophilic protease. Protein Expres. Purif., 2014, 93: 63-76 CrossRef
  18. Krogdahl A. Digestion and absorption of lipids in poultry. J. Nutr., 1985, 115(5): 675-685.
  19. Fisinin V.I., Vertiprakhov V.G., Grozina A.A., Khasanova L.V. Pancreatic secretion and intestinal digestibility of amino acids in chicken at different dietary protein level and quality. Agricultural Biology, 2017, 52(2): 374-381 CrossRef
  20. Batoev Ts.Zh. Fiziologiya pishchevareniya ptits. Ulan-Ude, 2001 (in Russ.).
  21. Wiseman J. Variations in starch digestibility in non-ruminants. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 2006, 130(1-2): 66-77 CrossRef
  22. Layer P., Go V.L.W., DiMagno E.P. Fate of pancreatic enzymes during small intestinal aboral transit in humans. Am. J. Physiol., 1986, 251(4 Pt 1): G475-480 CrossRef
  23. Vertiprakhov V.G., Grozina A.A., Dolgorukova A.M. The activity of pancreatic enzymes on different stages of metabolism in broiler chicks. Agricultural Biology, 2016, 51(4): 509-515 CrossRef
  24. Esmaeilipour O., Moravej H., Shivazad M., Rezaian M., Aminzadeh S., Van Krimpen M.M. Effects of diet acidification and xylanase supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, duodenal histology and gut microflora of broilers fed wheat based diet. Br. Poult. Sci., 2012, 53(2): 235-244 CrossRef
  25. Polansky O., Sekelova Z., Faldynova M., Sebkova A., Sisak F., Rych-
    lik I. Important metabolic pathways and biological processes expressed by chicken cecal microbiota. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2016, 82: 1569-1576 CrossRef
  26. Wise M., Siragusa G. Quantitative analysis of the intestinal bacterial community in one- to three-week-old commercially reared broiler chickens fed conventional or antibiotic-free vegetable based diets. J. Appl. Microbiol., 2007, 102(4): 1138-1149 CrossRef
  27. Molnar A.K., Podmaniczky B., Kurti P., Tenk I., Glávits R., Virág G., Szabó Z. Effect of different concentrations of Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, carcass quality, gut microflora and immune response of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 2011, 52(6): 658-665 CrossRef 
  28. Zdunczyk Z., Jankowski J., Kaczmarek S. Determinants and effects of postileal fermentation in broilers and turkeys. Part 1: gut microbiota composition and its modulation by feed additives. World’s Poult. Sci. J., 2015, 71(1): 37-57 CrossRef

back