doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2018.5.927eng

UDC 633.521:581.15:575.167(571.12)

 

USE OF MORPHOPHYSIOLOGICAL MARKERS IN INTRASPECIFIC
POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS OF FLAX Linum usitatissimum L.

K.P. Korolev, N.A. Bome

Tyumen State University, 6, ul. Volodarskogo, Tyumen, 625003 Russia, e-mail bomena@mail.ru (✉ corresponding author), corolev.konstantin2016@yandex.ru

ORCID:
Korolev K.P. orcid.org/0000-0001-9595-3493
Bome N.A. orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-5365
The authors declare no conflict of interests

Received July 11, 2018

 

In worsen environmental conditions sustainable agriculture and high quality food production rely on crop diversity and adaptiveness that requires the improved estimates of plant parameters. Flax which is among the recognized promising crops is presently rare in the Tyumen region. Our paper shows the most informative morphometric criteria of adaptiveness for several domestic and foreign flax varieties studied under local conditions. The criteria are for the first time improved by a rapid noninvasive method of chlorophyll measurement in leaves with a SPAD 502 optical counter. The purpose of this work was to estimate response of Linum usitatissimum L. genotypes to the environmental factors and to identify signs for use as indicators of adaptability. A total of 20 collection samples of flax of different ecological and geographical origin from Russia (6 samples), Belarus (7 samples), Czechia (2 samples), Ukraine (1 sample), France (1 sample), Canada (1 sample), Australia (1 sample), and Germany (1 sample) were used. Laboratory and field tests were conducted in 2016-2017. Seeds were germinated in Petri dishes on a filter paper moistened with distilled water at 20 °C, germination energy, laboratory germination rate, morphometric parameters and biomass of seedlings were determined. To test the plants at the initial stages of ontogenesis, 20 seeds were sown in 4-fold repeat in the vegetation pots. For field study (Biological station of the Tyumen state university «Biostation Kuchak», Tyumen Region, Nizhnetavdinsky District), 200 seeds of each sample were sown on 1 m2 plots in 3-fold repetition. Chlorophyll content in leaves was determined using an optical counter SPAD 502 («Minolta Camera Co., Ltd», Japan), three times with a 5 day interval in the laboratory test and seven times (according to the phenological phases — full shoots, herringbone, rapid growth, budding, flowering, green ripeness, and early yellow ripeness) in the field test. As per results obtained the seeds of the studied flax samples had two types of color (brown and yellow), differed in length (3.0-5.4 mm), width (2.1-8.2 mm), weight of 1000 seeds (6.57-4.36 g), shape (elongated-elliptic, ovoid flattened), which indicates sample heterogeneity. Features of plant growth and development at the initial stages of ontogenesis in some cases were confirmed in the field. For example, the length of the shoot in plants of varieties Mayak, Rybin, and Iva in the laboratory test is the largest of the entire experimental group (13.1; 12.5; 12.1 cm, respectively), and in the field, these varieties are in the ‘tall’ group according to plant height (96.1-100.2 cm). The yield of the flax straw was more (166.6-171.7 g/m2) in the varieties having shoots substantially predominating in the plant biomass (Grant, Mayak, Bertelsdorfer). Field germination rate (62.3-77.3 %) and plant survival during the growing season (70.6-85.8 %) we refer to the informative criteria that characterize a number of ontogenetic interrelated processes. Also, we propose SPAD 502 readings (SPAD index) to evaluate the genotype × environment interactions. Our results show positive correlations between SPAD index and parameters of plant assimilation surface (linear size, area and number of leaves, and plant height), as well as plant survival during the growing season. Significant differences are revealed between the studied samples in the average daily chlorophyll accumulation in the leaves before flowering and chlorophyll degradation at green and early yellow ripeness phases. Significant advantage in flax straw and seed yields have samples with a relatively rapid increase in SPAD index during the first half of the growing season with further uniform decrease towards maturity phase. Thus, Grant, Mayak (Belarus), Bertelsdorfer (Germany), Svalof (Czech Republic), Ottava 770 B See (Canada) are the varieties that combine high adaptive and productive properties.

Keywords: Linum usitatissimum L., flax, collection sample, chlorophyll counter SPAD 502, simulated and natural conditions.

 

Full article (Rus)

Full article (Eng)

 

REFERENCES

  1. Dzharvis D.I., Majer L., Klemik H., Guarino L., Smejl M., Braun A.H.D., Sadiki M., SHapit B., Hodkin T. Uchebnoe posobie po in situ sokhraneniyu v usloviyakh khozyaistva (on-farm) [A training guide for in situ conservation on-farm]. Rim, 2002 (in Russ.).
  2. Bome N.A. Podbor kul'tur i metody sozdaniya sortov dlya ekstremal'nykh uslovii Severnogo Zaural'ya. Avtoreferat doktorskoi dissertatsii [Selection of crops and methods for creating varieties for extreme conditions of the Northern Trans-Urals. DSciThesis]. St. Petersburg, 1996 (in Russ.).
  3. Tyutyuma N.V. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty izucheniya selektsionnoi tsennosti genofonda zernovykh kolosovykh kul'tur v aridnykh usloviyakh Nizhnego Povolzh'ya. Avtoreferat doktorskoi dissertatsii [Theoretical and applied aspects of studying the breeding value of the gene pool of cereal crops in the arid conditions of the Lower Volga region. DSci Thesis]. Astrakhan', 2009 (in Russ.).
  4. Osnovnye pokazateli sel'skogo khozyaistva Tyumenskoi oblasti (1913-1996) [The main indicators of agriculture of the Tyumen region (1913-1996)]. Tyumen', 1997 (in Russ.).
  5. Kaydan D., Yagmur M. Germination, seedling growth and relative water content of shoot in different seed sires of triticale under osmotic stress of water and NaCl. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2008, 7(16): 2862-2868.
  6. Ma X.F., Yu T., Wang L.H., Shi X., Zheng L.X., Wang M.X., Yao Y.Q., Gai H.J. Effects of water deficit at seedlings stage on maize root development and anatomical structure. The Journal of Applied Ecology (Chine), 2010, 21(7): 1731-1736.
  7. Khodadad M. An evaluation of safflower genotypes (Carthamus tinctorius L.), seed germination and seedlings characters in salt stress conditions. African Journal Agriculture Research, 2011, 2(3): 1667-1672.
  8. Taeger S., Sparks T.H., Menzel A. Effects of temperature and drought manipulations on seedlings of Scots pine provenances. Plant Biol., 2015, 17(2): 361-372 CrossRef
  9. Pour-Aboughadareh A., Ahmadi J., Mehrabi A. Physiological responses to drought stress in wild relatives of wheat: implications for wheat improvement. Acta Physiol. Plant., 2017, 39: 106 CrossRef
  10. Ogbonnaya F., Rasheed A., Okechukwu E. Genome-wide association study for agronomic and physiological traits in spring wheat evaluated in a range of heat prone environments. Theor. Appl. Genet., 2017, 130(9): 1819-1835 CrossRef
  11. Honsdorf N., March T., Hecht A., Eglinton J. Evaluation of juvenile drought stress tolerance and genotyping by sequencing with wild barley introgression lines. Mol. Breeding, 2014, 34(3): 1475-1495 CrossRef
  12. Buschmann C., Konanz S., Zhou M. Excitation kinetics of chlorophyll fluorescence during light-induced greening and establishment of photosynthetic activity of barley seedlings. Photosynthetica, 2013, 51(2): 221-230 CrossRef
  13. Sánchez-Martín J., Mur L.A.J., Rubiales D. Targeting sources of drought tolerance within an Avena spp. collection through multivariate approaches. Planta, 2012, 236(5): 1529-1545 CrossRef
  14. Aghaee A., Moradi F., Zare-Maivan H., Zarinkamar F., Irandoost H., Sharifi P. Physiological responses of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes to chilling stress at seedling stage. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2011, 10(39): 7617-7621.
  15. Gianquinto G., Goffart J., Olivier M. The use of hand-held chlorophyll meters as a tool to assess the nitrogen status and to guide nitrogen fertilization of potato crop. Potato Res., 2004, 47(1-2): 35-80 CrossRef
  16. Wu Q., Su N., Shen W., Cui J. Analyzing photosynthetic activity and growth of Solanum lycopersicum seedlings exposed to different light qualities. Acta Physiol. Plant., 2014, 36(6): 1411-1420 CrossRef
  17. Torricelli R., Tiranti B., Spataro G. Differentiation and structure of an Italian landrace of celery (Apium graveolens L.): inferences for on farm conservation. Genet. Resour. Crop Ev., 2013, 60(3): 995-1006 CrossRef
  18. Martins M., Souza W. Characterization of sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) leaf senescence: implications for biofuel production. Biotechnol. Biofuels, 2016, 9: 153 CrossRef
  19. De Castro F.A., Campostrini E., Netto A. Portable chlorophyll meter (PCM-502) values are related to total chlorophyll concentration and photosynthetic capacity in papaya (Carica papaya L.). Theor. Exp. Plant Phys., 2014, 26(3-4): 201-210 CrossRef
  20. Scotti I., Calvo-Vialettes L., Scotti-Saintagne C. Genetic variation for growth, morphological, and physiological traits in a wild population of the Neotropical shade-tolerant rainforest tree Sextonia rubra (Mez) van der Werff (Lauraceae). Tree Genet. Genomes, 2010, 6(2): 319-329 CrossRef
  21. Wang Y., Hong W., Wu C., Lin H., Fan H. Variation of SPAD values in uneven-aged leaves of different dominant species in Castanopsis carlessi forest in Lingshishan National Forest Park . J. Forestry Res., 2009, 20(4): 362-366 CrossRef
  22. Barry K., Newnham G., Stone C. Estimation of chlorophyll content in Eucalyptus globulus foliage with the leaf reflectance model PROSPECT. Agr. Forest Meteorol., 2009, 149(6-7): 1209-1213.
  23. Nigam S., Aruna R. Stability of soil plant analytical development (SPAD) chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR) and specific leaf area (SLA) and their association across varying soil moisture stress conditions in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica, 2008,160(1): 111-117 CrossRef
  24. Kühling I., Hüsing B., Bome N., Trautz D. Soybeans in high latitudes: effects of Bradyrhizobium inoculation in Northwest Germany and southern West Siberia. Organic Agriculture, 2018, 8(2): 159-171 CrossRef 
  25. Thompson J., Schweitzer L., Nelson R. Association of specific leaf weight, an estimate of chlorophyll, and chlorophyll concentration with apparent photosynthesis in soybean. Photosynth. Res., 1996, 49: 1-10.
  26. Ling Q., Huang W. Jarvis, P. Use of a SPAD-502 meter to measure leaf chlorophyll concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynth. Res., 2011, 107(2): 209-214 CrossRef
  27. Gratani L., Crescente M., Fabrini G., Varone L. Growth pattern of Bidens cernua L.: relationships between relative growth rate and its physiological and morphological components. Photosynthetica,2008,46: 179 CrossRef
  28. Kiani-Pouya A., Rasouli F. The potential of leaf chlorophyll content to screen bread-wheat genotypes in saline condition. Photosynthetica, 2014, 52(2): 288-300 CrossRef
  29. Figueiredo N., Carranca C., Trindade H. Elevated carbon dioxide and temperature effects on rice yield, leaf greenness, and phenological stages duration. Paddy Water Environ., 2015, 13(4): 313-324 CrossRef
  30. Hund A., Frascarol E., Leipner J., Jompuk C. Cold tolerance of the photosynthetic apparatus: Pleiotropic relationship between photosynthetic performance and specific leaf area of maize seedlings. Mol. Breeding , 2005,16(4): 321-331 CrossRef
  31. Caser M., Lovisolo C., Scariot V. The influence of water stress on growth, ecophysiology and ornamental quality of potted Primula vulgaris ‘Heidy’ plants. New insights to increase water use efficiency in plant production. Plant Growth Regul. , 2017, 83(3): 361-373 CrossRef
  32. Erturk U.,  Sivritepe N.,  Yerlikaya C., Bor M.,  Ozdemir F.,  Turkan I. Responses of the cherry rootstock to salinity in vitro. Biol. Plantarum , 2007, 51(3): 597-600 CrossRef
  33. Kapotis G., Zervoudakis G., Veltsistas T. comparison of chlorophyll meter readings with leaf chlorophyll concentration in Amaranthus vlitus: correlation with physiological processes. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2003, 50(3): 395-397 CrossRef
  34. GOST R 52325-2005 «Semena sel'skokhozyaistvennykh rastenii. Sortovye i posevnye kachestva. Obshchie i tekhnicheskie usloviya» [RF State Standard R 52325-2005. Crop seed quality parameters]. Moscow, 2005 (in Russ.).
  35. Pavlova L.N., Aleksandrova T.A., Marchenkov A.N., Rozhmina T.A., Loshakova N.I., Kudryavtseva L.P., Krylova T.V., Gerasimova E.G. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po selektsii l'na-dolguntsa [Guidelines for the selection of flax-fiber]. Moscow, 2004 (in Russ.).
  36. Dospekhov B.A Metodika polevogo opyta [Methods of field trials]. Moscow, 2014 (in Russ.).
  37. Lakin G.F. Biometriya [Biometry]. Moscow, 1990 (in Russ.).
  38. Field A., Mieles J., Field Z. Discovering statistics using R. SAGE Publication LTD, London, 2012.
  39. Mezhdunarodnyi klassifikator SEV vida Linum usitatissimum L. [ÑMEA International classifier of Linum usitatissimum L. species].Leningrad, 1989 (in Russ.).
  40. Yaglo M.N. Vicnik Zaporiz'kogo natsional'nogo universitetu. Biologichni nauki, 2014, 1: 39-46 (in Russ.).
  41. Porokhovinova E. Vavilovskii zhurnal genetiki i selektsii, 2012, 16(4/2): 936-947 (in Russ.).
  42. Filho J.M. Seed vigor testing: an overview of the past, present and future perspective. Sci. Agr., 2015, 72(4): 363-374 CrossRef 
  43. Kosulina L.G., Lutsenko E.K., Aksenova V. Fiziologiya ustoichivosti rastenii k neblagopriyatnym faktoram sredy [Physiology of plant resistance to adverse environmental factors]. Rostov-na-Donu, 1993 (in Russ.).
  44. Bome N.A., Bome A.Ya., Tetyannikov N.V. Agrarnyi vestnik Urala, 2015, 4(134): 15-18 (in Russ.).
  45. Cicero S., van der Schoor R., Jalink H. Use of chlorophyll fluorescence sorting to improve soybean seed quality. Revista Brasileira de Sementes, 2009, 31(4): 145-151 CrossRef
  46. Sims D.A., Gamon J.A. Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote. Sens. Environ., 2002, 81(2-3): 337-354 CrossRef
  47. Steele M., Gitelson A.A., Rundquist D. Non-destructive estimation of leaf chlorophyll content in grapes. Am. J. Enol. Viticult., 2008, 59: 299-305.
  48. Bowyer J.B., Leegood R.C. Photosynthesis. In: Plant Biochemistry. P.M. Dry, J.B. Harborne (eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, 1997: 49-110 CrossRef
  49. Wiesler F., Bauer M., Kamh M., Engels T., Reusch S. The crop as indicator for sidedress nitrogen demand in sugar beet production — limitations and perspectives. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 2002, 165: 93-99.
  50. Wang Q., Chen J., Li Y. Nondestructive and rapid estimation of leaf chlorophyll and nitrogen status of peace lily using chlorophyll meter. J. Plant Nutr., 2004, 27(3): 557-569 CrossRef
  51. Uddling J., Gelang-Alfredson J., Piikki K., Pleijel H. Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings. Photosynth. Res., 2007, 91(1): 37-46 CrossRef

 

back