PLANT BIOLOGY
ANIMAL BIOLOGY
SUBSCRIPTION
E-SUBSCRIPTION
 
MAP
MAIN PAGE

 

 

 

 

doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2025.4.604eng

UDC: 636.013:575:577.218

 

SEARCHING FOR “KEYS” TO ANIMAL’S DOMESTICATION (review)

G.Yu. Kosovsky, T.T. Glazko

Afanas`ev Research Institute of Fur-Bearing Animal Breeding and Rabbit Breeding, 6, ul. Trudovaya, pos. Rodniki, Ramenskii District, Moscow Province, 140143 Russia, e-mail gkosovsky@mail.ru, tglazko@rambler.ru (✉ corresponding author)

ORCID:
Kosovsky G.Yu. orcid.org/0000-0003-3808-3086
Glazko T.T. orcid.org/0000-0002-3879-6935

Final revision received March 10, 2025
Accepted May28, 2025

The dynamics of global environmental changes, the qualitative novelty of emerging new ecosystems (M.R. Kerr et al., 2025), and the reduction of biodiversity, including agricultural species, attract increasing attention to the search for domestication mechanisms. In this regard, the relationships between domestication and its impact on environmental changes in its implementation, as well as the main physiological and molecular genetic systems involved in domestication processes are considered. Accumulated data indicate that the same phenotypic changes in animals in their molecular genetic basis are more often convergent than parallel (J. Yang et al., 2024), involving close metabolic pathways but different genes in variability. A relatively greater contribution to intra- and interspecific differentiation of metabolic pathways associated with adaptation to environmental conditions is noted compared to the action of artificial selection factors (P.A.S. Fonseca et al., 2024). No qualitative differences were found between domesticated and closely related wild animal species in characteristics of protein-coding gene variability, namely, the ratio of non-synonym-ous/synonymous substitutions in amino acid codons (D. Castellano et al., 2025), the difference in number of protein--coding gene copies exceeding those known for genes of supergene families between closely related wild species (X. Feng et al., 2017). All pairwise compared animal species, including those unconventional for studying domestication processes (e.g., songbirds, laboratory mouse lines, rats, and silkworms) show pronounced changes in gene expression profiles in brain structures. Since the formation of regulatory systems of multicellular organisms is based on mobile genetic elements (transposons, TEs) and their recombination products, two main pathways of their involvement in the control of gene expression profiles are considered: 1) preservation of gag genes of exogenous retroviral precursors to form exosomes like a viral capsid for transporting signaling molecules to other cells (W.S. Henriques et al., 2024), 2) participation of TEs in the formation of binding sites for transcription regulation factors, the integration of TEs into genes encoding such factors, and direct TE-induced changes in the epigenetic characteristics of different genomic regions, namely DNA methylation, histone modification, generation of regulatory non-coding RNAs (for example, circular RNA, microRNA and lncRNA) (A. Gebrie et al., 2023). Genomic comparisons of domestic, wild and reintroduced domestic rabbits indicate accelerated disappearance of “domestic” alleles in the latter, mostly associated with nervous activity and with binding sites for certain transcription regulation factors (P. Andrade et al., 2024). It can be expected that the search for such regions of genomic DNA will contribute not only to the clarification of domestication mechanisms, but also to their practical application.

Keywords: domestication, convergence, parallelism, closely related and wild species, regulation of gene expression, transposons.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Glazko V.I., Kosovsky G.Yu., Glazko T.T. The sources of genome variability as domestication drivers (review). Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2022, 57(5): 832-851 CrossRef
  2. Glazko V.I., Kosovsky G.Yu., Glazko T.T. Domestication is the proprietary case of evolution: about the universality of principles and elements (review).Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2023, 58(5): 821-839 CrossRef
  3. Glazko V.I., Kosovsky G.Yu., Glazko T.T. On genocentricity and genomocentricity in basic living systems: microorganisms, plants, animals (review). Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2024, 59(3): 426-445 CrossRef
  4. Spengler R.N., Tang L., Dal Corso M., Gillis R.E., Oliveira H.R., Makhamad B.M. Seeking consensus on the domestication concept. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 2025, 380(1926): 20240188 CrossRef
  5. Zeller U., Göttert T. The relations between evolution and domestication reconsidered — implications for systematics, ecology, and nature conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2019, 2019: e00756 CrossRef
  6. Lord K.A., Larson G., Allaby R.G., Karlsson E.K. A universally applicable definition for domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2025, 122(22): e2413207122 CrossRef
  7. Frantz L.A.F., Bradley D.G., Larson G., Orlando L. Animal domestication in the era of ancient genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet., 2020, 21(8): 449-460 CrossRef
  8. Purugganan M.D. What is domestication? Trends Ecol. Evol., 2022, 37(8): 663-671 CrossRef
  9. Ferreira V.H.B., Lansade L., Calandreau L., Cunha F., Jensen P. Are domesticated animals dumber than their wild relatives? A comprehensive review on the domestication effects on animal cognitive performance. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2023, 154: 105407 CrossRef
  10. Wan N.F., Dainese M., Wang Y.Q., Loreau M. Cascading social-ecological benefits of biodiversity for agriculture. Curr. Biol., 2024, 34(12): R587-R603 CrossRef
  11. Wilkins A.S., Wrangham R.W., Fitch W.T. The “domestication syndrome” in mammals: a unified explanation based on neural crest cell behavior and genetics. Genetics, 2014, 197(3): 795-808 CrossRef
  12. Johnsson M., Henriksen R., Wright D. The neural crest cell hypothesis: no unified explanation for domestication. Genetics, 2021, 219(1): iyab097 CrossRef
  13. Gleeson B.T., Wilson L.A.B. Shared reproductive disruption, not neural crest or tameness, explains the domestication syndrome. Proc. Biol. Sci., 2023, 290(1995): 20222464 CrossRef
  14. Kerr M.R., Ordonez A., Riede F., Atkinson J., Pearce E.A., Sykut M., Trepel J., Svenning J.C. Widespread ecological novelty across the terrestrial biosphere. Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2025, 9(4): 589-598 CrossRef
  15. Walentowitz A. Ecological novelty is the new norm on our planet. Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2025, 9(4): 539-540 CrossRef
  16. Glazko V.I., Kosovsky G.Yu. Globalization and agrarian civilization. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 2018, 5(2): 179-189 CrossRef
  17. Casas A., Vallejo M., Parra-Rondinel F. Domestication of species and landscapes in Mesoamerica. In: Pochettino M.L., Capparelli A., Stampella P.C., Andreoni D. (eds.) Nature(s) in construction. The Latin American Studies Book Series. Springer, Cham, 2024 CrossRef
  18. O’Rourke T., Boeckx C. Glutamate receptors in domestication and modern human evolution. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 2020, 108: 341-357 CrossRef
  19. Trut L.N., Naumenko E.V., Belyaev D.K. Changes in the pituitary-adrenal function of silver-black foxes during selection for behavior. Genetics, 1972; 8: 35-43.
  20. Burgess M.G., Gaines S.D. The scale of life and its lessons for humanity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2018, 115(25): 6328-6330 CrossRef
  21. Greenspoon L., Krieger E., Sender R., Rosenberg Y., Bar-On Y.M., Moran U, Antman T, Meiri S., Roll U., Noor E., Milo R. The global biomass of wild mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2023, 120(10): e2204892120 CrossRef
  22. Andermann T., Faurby S., Turvey S.T., Antonelli A., Silvestro D. The past and future human impact on mammalian diversity. Sci. Adv., 2020, 6(36): eabb2313 CrossRef
  23. Waring T.M., Wood Z.T., Szathmáry E. Characteristic processes of human evolution caused the Anthropocene and may obstruct its global solutions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 2024, 379(1893): 20220259 CrossRef
  24. Svenning J.C., Lemoine R.T., Bergman J., Buitenwerf R., Le Roux E., Lundgren E., Mungi N., Pedersen R.O. The late-Quaternary megafauna extinctions: Patterns, causes, ecological consequences and implications for ecosystem management in the Anthropocene. Camb. Prism. Extinct., 2024, 2: e5 CrossRef
  25. Third World population growth at record high. Integration, 1994, 41: 53.
  26. Philippine Legislators' Committee on Population and Development Foundation. Global carrying capacity: how many people? People Count, 1992, 2(6): 1-4.
  27. De Jonge C.J., Barratt C.L.R., Aitken R.J., Anderson R.A., Baker P., Chan D.Y.L., Connolly M.P., Eisenberg M.L., Garrido N., Jørgensen N., Kimmins S., Krausz C., McLachlan R.I., Niederberger C., O’Bryan M.K., Pacey A., Priskorn L., Rautakallio-Hokkanen S., Serour G., Veltman J.A., Vogel D.L., Vazquez-Levin M.H. Current global status of male reproductive health. Hum. Reprod. Open, 2024, 2024(2): hoae017 CrossRef
  28. Mueller N.G., Willman J.C. Domestication as the evolution of interspecies cooperative breeding. Evol. Anthropol., 2024, 33(5) :e22042 CrossRef
  29. Anastasiadi D., Piferrer F., Wellenreuther M., Benítez Burraco A. Fish as model systems to study epigenetic drivers in human self-domestication and neurodevelopmental cognitive disorders. Genes (Basel), 2022, 13(6): 987 CrossRef
  30. Diamond J. Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication. Nature, 2002, 418(6898): 700-707 CrossRef
  31. Sapolsky R.M., Romero L.M., Munck A.U. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? Integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions. Endocr. Rev., 2000, 21(1): 55-89 CrossRef
  32. Larson G., Piperno D.R., Allaby R.G., Purugganan M.D., Andersson L., Arroyo-Kalin M., Barton L., Climer Vigueira C., Denham T., Dobney K., Doust A.N., Gepts P., Gilbert M.T., Gremillion K.J., Lucas L., Lukens L., Marshall F.B., Olsen K.M., Pires J.C., Richerson P.J., Rubio de Casas R., Sanjur O.I., Thomas M.G., Fuller D.Q. Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2014, 111(17): 6139-6146 CrossRef
  33. Fuller D.Q., Denham T., Arroyo-Kalin M., Lucas L., Stevens C.J., Qin L., Allaby R.G., Purugganan M.D. Convergent evolution and parallelism in plant domestication revealed by an expanding archaeological record. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2014, 111(17): 6147-6152 CrossRef
  34. Castellano D., Vourlaki I.T., Gutenkunst R.N., Ramos-Onsins S.E. Detection of domestication signals through the analysis of the full distribution of fitness effects. Peer Community J., 2025, 5: e35 CrossRef
  35. Nayak S.S., Rajawat D., Jain K., Sharma A., Gondro C., Tarafdar A., Dutt T., Panigrahi M. A comprehensive review of livestock development: insights into domestication, phylogenetics, diversity, and genomic advances. Mamm. Genome, 2024, 35(4): 577-599 CrossRef
  36. Andersson L., Purugganan M. Molecular genetic variation of animals and plants under domestication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2022, 119(30): e2122150119 CrossRef
  37. Wang Q., Lu Y., Li M., Gao Z., Li D., Gao Y., Deng W., Wu J. Leveraging whole-genome resequencing to uncover genetic diversity and promote conservation strategies for ruminants in Asia. Animals (Basel), 2025, 15(6): 831 CrossRef
  38. Xu S., Akhatayeva Z., Liu J., Feng X., Yu Y., Badaoui B., Esmailizadeh A., Kantanen J., Amills M., Lenstra J.A., Johansson A.M., Coltman D.W., Liu G.E., Curik I., Orozco-terWengel P., Paiva S.R., Zinovieva N.A., Zhang L., Yang J., Liu Z., Wang Y., Yu Y., Li M. Genetic advancements and future directions in ruminant livestock breeding: from reference genomes to multiomics innovations. Sci. China Life Sci., 2025, 68(4): 934-960 CrossRef
  39. Yang J., Wang D.F., Huang J.H., Zhu Q.H., Luo L.Y., Lu R., Xie X.L., Salehian-Dehkordi H., Esmailizadeh A., Liu G.E., Li M.H. Structural variant landscapes reveal convergent signatures of evolution in sheep and goats. Genome Biol., 2024, 25(1): 148 CrossRef
  40. Lavialle C., Cornelis G., Dupressoir A., Esnault C., Heidmann O., Vernochet C., Heidmann T. Paleovirology of 'syncytins', retroviral env genes exapted for a role in placentation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 2013, 368(1626): 20120507 CrossRef
  41. Foley N.M., Mason V.C., Harris A.J., Bredemeyer K.R., Damas J., Lewin H.A., Eizirik E., Gatesy J., Karlsson E.K., Lindblad-Toh K., Zoonomia Consortium, Springer M.S., Murphy W.J. A genomic timescale for placental mammal evolution. Science, 2023, 380(6643): eabl8189 CrossRef
  42. Benjelloun B., Leempoel K., Boyer F., Stucki S., Streeter I., Orozco-terWengel P., Alberto F.J., Servin B., Biscarini F., Alberti A., Engelen S., Stella A., Colli L., Coissac E., Bruford M.W., Ajmone-Marsan P., Negrini R., Clarke L., Flicek P., Chikhi A., Joost S., Taberlet P., Pompanon F. Multiple genomic solutions for local adaptation in two closely related species (sheep and goats) facing the same climatic constraints. Mol. Ecol., 2023, 2023: e17257 CrossRef
  43. Da Silva A., Ahbara A., Baazaoui I., Jemaa S.B., Cao Y., Ciani E., Dzomba E.F., Evans L., Gootwine E., Hanotte O., Harris L., Li M.H., Mastrangelo S., Missohou A., Molotsi A., Muchadeyi F.C., Mwacharo J.M., Tallet G., Vernus P., Hall S.J.G., Lenstra J.A. History and genetic diversity of African sheep: contrasting phenotypic and genomic diversity. Anim. Genet., 2025, 56(1): e13488 CrossRef
  44. Olsen K.M., Caicedo A.L., Polato N., McClung A., McCouch S., Purugganan M.D. Selection under domestication: evidence for a sweep in the rice waxy genomic region. Genetics, 2006, 173(2): 975-983 CrossRef
  45. Beja-Pereira A., Luikart G., England P.R., Bradley D.G., Jann O.C., Bertorelle G., Chamberlain A.T., Nunes T.P., Metodiev S., Ferrand N., Erhardt G. Gene-culture coevolution between cattle milk protein genes and human lactase genes. Nat. Genet., 2003, 35(4): 311-313 CrossRef
  46. Fonseca P.A.S., Suárez-Vega A., Arranz J.J., Gutiérrez-Gil B. Integration of selective sweeps across the sheep genome: understanding the relationship between production and adaptation traits. Genet. Sel. Evol., 2024, 56(1): 40 CrossRef
  47. Eydivandi S., Roudbar M.A., Karimi M.O., Sahana G. Genomic scans for selective sweeps through haplotype homozygosity and allelic fixation in 14 indigenous sheep breeds from Middle East and South Asia. Sci. Rep., 2021, 11(1): 2834 CrossRef
  48. Rodrigues J.L., Braga L.G., Watanabe R.N., Schenkel F.S., Berry D.P., Buzanskas M.E., Munari D.P. Genetic diversity and selection signatures in sheep breeds. J. Appl. Genet., 2025, 66(3): 675-687 CrossRef
  49. Sahlén P., Yanhu L., Xu J., Kubinyi E., Wang G.D., Savolainen P. Variants that differentiate wolf and dog populations are enriched in regulatory elements. Genome Biol. Evol., 2021, 13(4): evab076 CrossRef
  50. Jonas D., Tatrai K., Sandor S., Egyed B., Kubinyi E. Dog domestication strongly relied on translation regulation according to differential gene expression analysis. Animals (Basel), 2024, 14(18): 2655 CrossRef
  51. Liu J., Shi Y., Mo D., Luo L., Xu S., Lv F. The goat pan-genome reveals patterns of gene loss during domestication. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol., 2024, 15(1): 132 CrossRef
  52. Liu J., Mo D., Luo L., Shi Y., Xu S. Sheep pan-genome retrieves the lost sequences and genes during domestication and selection. Genomics, 2025, 117(3): 111047 CrossRef
  53. Buglione M., Rivieccio E., Aceto S., Paturzo V., Biondi C., Fulgione D. The domestication of wild boar could result in a relaxed selection for maintaining olfactory capacity. Life (Basel), 2024, 14(8): 1045 CrossRef
  54. Feng X., Jiang J., Padhi A., Ning C., Fu J., Wang A., Mrode R., Liu J.F. Characterization of genome-wide segmental duplications reveals a common genomic feature of association with immunity among domestic animals. BMC Genomics, 2017, 18(1): 293 CrossRef
  55. Li J.Y., He J., Chen M.Y. A review of canid immunogenomics: how domestication shaped the canine immune system. International Journal of Molecular Zoology, 2024, 14(6): 297-304 CrossRef
  56. Dornburg A., Mallik R., Wang Z., Bernal M.A., Thompson B., Bruford E.A., Nebert D.W., Vasiliou V., Yohe L.R., Yoder J.A., Townsend J.P. Placing human gene families into their evolutionary context. Hum. Genomics, 2022, 16(1): 56 CrossRef
  57. Yusuf N, Monahan K. Epigenetic programming of stochastic olfactory receptor choice. Genesis, 2024, 62(2): e23593 CrossRef
  58. Sartore S., Moretti R., Chessa S., Sacchi P. Genetic and gene-by-environment influences on aggressiveness in dogs: a systematic review from 2000 to 2024. Animals (Basel), 2025, 15(15): 2267 CrossRef
  59. Glazko V.I. Domestication and genome evolution. International Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2014, 2(4): 47-56 CrossRef
  60. Glazko V.I. Gene and genomic levels of domestication signature.Sel’skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2018, 53(4): 659-672 CrossRef
  61. Brovkina M.V., Chapman M.A., Holding M.L., Clowney E.J. Emergence and influence of sequence bias in evolutionarily malleable, mammalian tandem arrays. BMC Biol., 2023, 21(1): 179 CrossRef
  62. Carneiro M., Rubin C.J., Di Palma F., Albert F.W., Alföldi J., Martinez Barrio A., Pielberg G., Rafati N., Sayyab S., Turner-Maier J., Younis S., Afonso S., Aken B., Alves J.M., Barrell D., Bolet G., Boucher S., Burbano H.A., Campos R., Chang J.L., Duranthon V., Fontanesi L., Garreau H., Heiman D., Johnson J., Mage R.G., Peng Z., Queney G., Rogel-Gaillard C., Ruffier M., Searle S., Villafuerte R., Xiong A., Young S., Forsberg-Nilsson K., Good J.M., Lander E.S., Ferrand N., Lindblad-Toh K., Andersson L. Rabbit genome analysis reveals a polygenic basis for phenotypic change during domestication. Science, 2014, 345(6200): 1074-1079 CrossRef
  63. Ruiz-De-La-Cruz G., Welsh T.H. Jr., Randel R.D., Sifuentes-Rincón A.M. A comprehensive systematic review coupled with an interacting network analysis identified candidate genes and biological pathways related to bovine temperament. Genes (Basel), 2024, 15(8): 981 CrossRef
  64. Farias-Virgens M., Peede D., Deacon T., Okanoya K., White S.A., Huerta-Sanchez E. The genomics of the domestication syndrome in a songbird model species. Commun. Biol., 2025. 8(1): 853 CrossRef
  65. Brusini I., Carneiro M., Wang C., Rubin C.J., Ring H., Afonso S., Blanco-Aguiar J.A., Ferrand N., Rafati N., Villafuerte R., Smedby Ö., Damberg P., Hallböök F., Fredrikson M., Andersson L. Changes in brain architecture are consistent with altered fear processing in domestic rabbits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2018, 115(28): 7380-7385 CrossRef
  66. Sato D.X., Rafati N., Ring H., Younis S., Feng C., Blanco-Aguiar J.A., Rubin C.J., Villafuerte R., Hallböök F., Carneiro M., Andersson L. Brain transcriptomics of wild and domestic rabbits suggests that changes in dopamine signaling and ciliary function contributed to evolution of tameness. Genome Biol. Evol., 2020, 12(10): 1918-1928 CrossRef
  67. Liu M., Yu C., Zhang Z., Song M., Sun X., Piálek J., Jacob J., Lu J., Cong L., Zhang H., Wang Y., Li G., Feng Z., Du Z., Wang M., Wan X., Wang D., Wang Y.L., Li H., Wang Z., Zhang B., Zhang Z. Whole-genome sequencing reveals the genetic mechanisms of domestication in classical inbred mice. Genome Biol., 2022, 23(1): 203 CrossRef
  68. Piálek J., Ďureje Ľ., Hiadlovská Z, Kreisinger J. Aghová T., Bryjová A., Čížková D, de Bellocq J.G., Hejlová H., Janotová K., Martincová I., Orth A., Piálková J., Pospíšilová I., Rousková L., Bímová B.V., Pfeifle C., Tautz D., Bonhomme F., Forejt J., Macholán M., Klusáčková P. Phenogenomic resources immortalized in a panel of wild-derived strains of five species of house mice. Sci. Rep., 2025, 15(1): 12060 CrossRef
  69. Hanzel M., Fernando K., Maloney S.E., Horn Z., Gong S., Mätlik K., Zhao J., Pasolli H.A., Heissel S., Dougherty J.D., Hull C., Hatten M.E. Mice lacking Astn2 have ASD-like behaviors and altered cerebellar circuit properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2024, 121(34): e2405901121 CrossRef
  70. Lionel A.C., Tammimies K., Vaags A.K., Rosenfeld J.A., Ahn J.W., Merico D., Noor A., Runke C.K., Pillalamarri V.K., Carter M.T., Gazzellone M.J., Thiruvahindrapuram B., Fagerberg C., Laulund L.W., Pellecchia G., Lamoureux S., Deshpande C., Clayton-Smith J., White A.C., Leather S., Trounce J., Melanie Bedford H., Hatchwell E., Eis P.S., Yuen R.K., Walker S., Uddin M., Geraghty M.T., Nikkel S.M., Tomiak E.M., Fernandez B.A., Soreni N., Crosbie J., Arnold P.D., Schachar R.J., Roberts W., Paterson A.D., So J., Szatmari P, Chrysler C., Woodbury-Smith M., Brian Lowry R., Zwaigenbaum L., Mandyam D., Wei J., Macdonald J.R., Howe J.L., Nalpathamkalam T., Wang Z., Tolson D., Cobb D.S., Wilks T.M., Sorensen M.J., Bader P.I., An Y., Wu B.L., Musumeci S.A., Romano C., Postorivo D., Nardone A.M., Monica M.D., Scarano G., Zoccante L., Novara F., Zuffardi O., Ciccone R., Antona V., Carella M., Zelante L., Cavalli P., Poggiani C., Cavallari U., Argiropoulos B., Chernos J., Brasch-Andersen C., Speevak M., Fichera M., Ogilvie C.M., Shen Y., Hodge J.C., Talkowski M.E., Stavropoulos D.J., Marshall C.R., Scherer S.W. Disruption of the ASTN2/TRIM32 locus at 9q33.1 is a risk factor in males for autism spectrum disorders, ADHD and other neurodevelopmental phenotypes. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2014, 23(10): 2752-2768 CrossRef
  71. Hillje A.L., Pavlou M.A., Beckmann E., Worlitzer M.M., Bahnassawy L., Lewejohann L., Palm T., Schwamborn J.C. TRIM32-dependent transcription in adult neural progenitor cells regulates neuronal differentiation. Cell Death Dis., 2013, 4(12): e976 CrossRef
  72. Liu J., Lu S., Zheng L., Guo Q., Cao L., Xiao Y., Chen D., Zou Y., Liu X., Deng C., Zhang S., Yang R., Wang Y., Zhang Y., Zhang N., Song X., Xing C., Wang Z., Cao L. ATM-CHK2-TRIM32 axis regulates ATG7 ubiquitination to initiate autophagy under oxidative stress. Cell. Rep., 2023, 42(11): 113402 CrossRef
  73. Chadaeva I., Ponomarenko P., Kozhemyakina R., Suslov V., Bogomolov A., Klimova N., Shikhevich S., Savinkova L., Oshchepkov D., Kolchanov N.A., Markel A., Ponomarenko M. Domestication explains two-thirds of differential-gene-expression variance between domestic and wild animals; the remaining one-third reflects intraspecific and interspecific variation. Animals (Basel), 2021, 11(9): 2667 CrossRef
  74. Oshchepkov D., Chadaeva I., Kozhemyakina R., Shikhevich S., Sharypova E., Savinkova L., Klimova N.V., Tsukanov A., Levitsky V.G., Markel A.L. Transcription factors as important regulators of changes in behavior through domestication of gray rats: quantitative data from RNA Sequencing. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2022, 23(20): 12269 CrossRef
  75. Chadaeva I., Kozhemyakina R., Shikhevich S, Bogomolov A., Kondratyuk E., Oshchepkov D., Orlov Y.L., Markel A.L. A principal components analysis and functional annotation of differentially expressed genes in brain regions of gray rats selected for tame or aggressive behavior. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2024, 25(9): 4613 CrossRef
  76. Cui Y., Liu Z..L., Li C.C., Wei X.M., Lin Y.J., You L., Zhu Z.D., Deng H.M., Feng Q.L., Huang Y.P, Xiang H. Role of juvenile hormone receptor Methoprene-tolerant 1 in silkworm larval brain development and domestication. Zool. Res., 2021, 42(5): 637-649 CrossRef
  77. Babina M., Franke K., Bal G. How "neuronal" are human skin mast cells? Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2022, 23(18): 10871 CrossRef
  78. Murillo-Rincón A.P., Kaucka M. Insights into the complexity of craniofacial development from a cellular perspective. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 2020, 8: 620735 CrossRef
  79. Glazko V.I., Kosovskiy G.Yu., Glazko T.T. Domestikatsiya i sotsiogenomika [Domestication and sociogenomics]. Moscow, 2023 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  80. Ferrari R., Grandi N., Tramontano E., Dieci G. Retrotransposons as drivers of mammalian brain evolution. Life (Basel), 2021, 11(5): 376 CrossRef
  81. Benler S., Koonin E.V. Recruitment of mobile genetic elements for diverse cellular functions in prokaryotes. Front. Mol. Biosci., 2022, 9: 821197 CrossRef
  82. Frith M.C. Paleozoic protein fossils illuminate the evolution of vertebrate genomes and transposable elements. Mol. Biol. Evol., 2022, 39(4): msac068 CrossRef
  83. Kitazawa M. Evolution of the nervous system by acquisition of retrovirus-derived genes in mammals. Genes Genet. Syst., 2024, 98(6): 321-336 CrossRef
  84. Chabukswar S., Grandi N., Lin L.T, Tramontano E. Envelope recombination: a major driver in shaping retroviral diversification and evolution within the host genome. Viruses, 2023, 15(9): 1856 CrossRef
  85. Henriques W.S., Young J.M., Nemudryi A., Nemudraia A., Wiedenheft B., Malik H.S. The diverse evolutionary histories of domesticated metaviral capsid genes in mammals. Mol. Biol. Evol., 2024, 41(4): msae061 CrossRef
  86. Pastuzyn E.D., Day C.E., Kearns R.B., Kyrke-Smith M., Taibi A.V., McCormick J., Yoder N., Belnap D.M., Erlendsson S., Morado D.R., Briggs J.A.G., Feschotte C., Shepherd J.D. The neuronal gene arc encodes a repurposed retrotransposon gag protein that mediates intercellular RNA transfer. Cell, 2018, 172(1-2): 275-288.e18 CrossRef
  87. Herbert A. Neurodegenerative diseases reflect the reciprocal roles played by retroelements in regulating memory and immunity. Front. Neurosci., 2024, 18: 1445540 CrossRef
  88. Wood T.W.P., Henriques W.S., Cullen H.B., Romero M., Blengini C.S., Sarathy S., Sorkin J., Bekele H., Jin C., Kim S., Wang X., Laureau R., Chemiakine A., Khondker R.C., Isola J.V.V., Stout M.B., Gennarino V.A., Mogessie B., Jain D., Schindler K., Suh Y., Wiedenheft B., Berchowitz L.E. The retrotransposon-derived capsid genes PNMA1 and PNMA4 maintain reproductive capacity. Nat. Aging, 2025, 5(5):765-779 CrossRef
  89. Herrera-Úbeda C., Garcia-Fernàndez J. New genes born-in or invading vertebrate genomes. Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 2021, 9: 713918 CrossRef
  90. Di Liegro C.M., Schiera G., Di Liegro I. Extracellular vesicle-associated RNA as a carrier of epigenetic information. Genes (Basel), 2017, 8(10): 240 CrossRef
  91. Schiera G., Di Liegro C.M., Vento F., Di Liegro I. Role of extracellular vesicles in the progression of brain tumors. Biology (Basel), 2024, 13(8): 586 CrossRef
  92. Duro M.G., Tavares L.A., Furtado I.P., Saint-Pol J., D’Angelo G. Protrusion-derived extracellular vesicles (PD-EVs) and their diverse origins: key players in cellular communication, cancer progression, and T cell modulation. Biol. Cell, 2025, 117(6): e70018 CrossRef
  93. Sierra P., Durbin R. Identification of transposable element families from pangenome polymorphisms. Mob. DNA, 2024, 15(1): 13 CrossRef
  94. Zhao P., Peng C., Fang L., Wang Z., Liu G.E. Taming transposable elements in livestock and poultry: a review of their roles and applications. Genet. Sel. Evol., 2023, 55(1): 50 CrossRef
  95. Yang N., Zhao B., Chen Y., D’Alessandro E., Chen C., Ji T., Wu X., Song C. Distinct retrotransposon evolution profile in the genome of rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Genome Biol. Evol., 2021, 13(8): evab168 CrossRef
  96. Gebrie A. Transposable elements as essential elements in the control of gene expression. Mob. DNA, 2023, 14(1): 9 CrossRef
  97. Du A.Y., Chobirko J.D., Zhuo X., Feschotte C., Wang T. Regulatory transposable elements in the encyclopedia of DNA elements. Nat. Commun., 2024, 15(1): 7594 CrossRef
  98. Metcalfe C.J., Casane D. Modular organization and reticulate evolution of the ORF1 of Jockey superfamily transposable elements. Mob. DNA, 2014, 5: 19 CrossRef
  99. Merici G., Amidani D., Dieci G., Rivetti C. A new strategy to investigate RNA:DNA triplex using atomic force microscopy. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2024, 25(5): 3035 CrossRef
  100. Ferrer J., Dimitrova N. Transcription regulation by long non-coding RNAs: mechanisms and disease relevance. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 2024, 25(5): 396-415 CrossRef
  101. Moawad A.S., Wang F., Zheng Y., Chen C., Saleh A.A., Hou J., Song C. Evolution of endogenous retroviruses in the subfamily of Caprinae. Viruses, 2024, 16(3): 398 CrossRef
  102. Jimba M., Takeshima S.N., Murakami H., Kohara J., Kobayashi N., Matsuhashi T., Ohmori T., Nunoya T., Aida Y. BLV-CoCoMo-qPCR: a useful tool for evaluating bovine leukemia virus infection status. BMC Veterinary Research,2012, 8: 167 CrossRef
  103. Andrade P., Alves J.M., Pereira P., Rubin C.J., Silva E., Sprehn C.G., Enbody E., Afonso S., Faria R., Zhang Y., Bonino N., Duckworth J.A., Garreau H., Letnic M., Strive T., Thulin C.G., Queney G., Villafuerte R., Jiggins F.M., Ferrand N., Andersson L., Carneiro M. Selection against domestication alleles in introduced rabbit populations. Nat. Ecol. Evol., 2024, 8(8): 1543-1555 CrossRef
  104. Fekete Z., Német Z., Ninausz N., Fehér P., Schiller M., Alnajjar M., Szenes Á., Nagy T., Stéger V., Kontra L., Barta E. Whole-genome sequencing-based population genetic analysis of wild and domestic rabbit breeds. Animals (Basel), 2025, 15(6): 775 CrossRef

 

back

 


CONTENTS

 

Full article PDF (Rus)