PLANT BIOLOGY
ANIMAL BIOLOGY
SUBSCRIPTION
E-SUBSCRIPTION
 
MAP
MAIN PAGE

 

 

 

 

doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2024.2.194eng

UDC: 636.22/.28:591.16

Acknowledgements:
The research was carried out with the support of the Ministry of Higher Education and Science of Russia within theme FGGN-2024-0014 (state registration number 124020200127-7).

 

DEVELOPING THE OVUM PICK-UP TECHNOLOGY IN CATTLE: STATE-OF-THE-ART AND RESEARCH DIRECTIONS (review)

R.Yu. Chinarov

Ernst Federal Research Center for Animal Husbandry, 60, pos. Dubrovitsy, Podolsk District, Moscow Province, 142132 Russia, e-mail roman_chinarov@mail.ru (✉ corresponding author)

ORCID:
Chinarov R.Yu. orcid.org/0000-0001-6511-5341

Final revision received November 02, 2023
Accepted November 27, 2023

Embryo transfer is an effective method of genetic improvement of cattle, which has become widespread around the world (C. Smith, 1988; N.A. Zinovieva et al., 2020). In 2015, the production of in vitro embryos (IVP-embryos) for the first time exceeded the number of embryos obtained by traditional MOET technology (IVD-embryos), after which it continued to grow, reaching 79.7 % of the total amount of embryos produced in 2021 (J.H.M. Viana, 2022). To date, 98.6 % of IVP embryos are obtained from oocytes retrieved by Ovum Pick-Up (OPU) (R.Yu. Chinarov et al., 2023). In this regard, it is of particular interest to increase the efficiency of OPU/IVP in terms of the quantitative and qualitative characteristics of the retrieved cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) (L.B. Ferré et al., 2023). To improve the efficiency of OPU, various approaches are used: optimization of the technical parameters of OPU; conducting OPU at a certain stage of follicular growth and development; increasing the number of simultaneously growing and maturing follicles through the use of gonadotropins; the use of biomarkers and DNA-markers for the selection of donor cows. The aim of this review is to define the factors and approaches affecting the quantitative and qualitative parameters of COCs obtained by OPU, to determine the directions and methodological approaches for further improvement of OPU/IVP technology. Studies of technical parameters have shown the impact on the OPU efficiency of such parameters as the diameter of the aspiration needle and the value of vacuum pressure (V.K. Pestis et al., 2016; F.A. Ward et al., 2000; R.Yu. Chinarov et al., 2022), while the optimal values of the above parameters depend on the type of equipment used and the specifics of the procedure performed by the operator. It was found that the OPU efficiency can be increased when performing oocyte retrieval immediately after the occurrence of the follicular wave before the selection of the dominant follicle (O.J. Ginther et al., 1996), while the developmental competence of oocytes are tended to increase with an increase of follicles size (L.J. Hagemann et al., 1999). Nevertheless, according to some authors, the quality of oocytes does not depend on the size of the follicles, and mainly determined by the follicular phase of the donor (M.M. Seneda et al., 2001). The technological approaches used to bring donor cows to the desired stage of the estrus cycle are conducting the OPU with a certain interval between sessions, the dominant follicle removal and the hormonal synchronization of the estrus cycle (M. Qi et al., 2013). An effective method of increasing the OPU efficiency is to stimulate the simultaneous growth and development of a larger number of follicles through the use of exogenous gonadotropins, e.g,, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG) (G.A. Bó et al., 2014; L.B. Ferré et al., 2023), while the use of FSH, in most cases, is more effective (F. Rivera et al., 2011; F.L. Ongaratto et al., 2015; G.N. Singina et al., 2019). A promising approach to improve the OPU efficiency is the use of biomarkers (G. Mazzoni et al., 2017; S. Umer et al., 2019; R. Kowsar et al., 2021). Thus, transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval (OPU) is today the main source of oocytes for commercial production of cows’ embryos worldwide, which leads to a wide range of studies aimed at improving the OPU efficiency. Despite the significant progress achieved in the development of OPU/IVP technology, it is necessary to conduct further research in determining the optimal technical and technological parameters of the procedure taking into account the genetic features of various cattle breeds.

Keywords: donor cows, Ovum Pick-Up, follicles, transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval, production of in vitro embryos, IVP.

 

REFERENCES

  1. Zinovieva N.A., Pozyabin S.V., Chinarov R.Yu. Assisted reproductive technologies: the history and role in the development of genetic technologies in cattle (review). Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2020, 55(2): 225-242 CrossRef
  2. Boni R. Ovum pick-up in cattle: a 25 years retrospective analysis. Animal Reproduction, 2012, 9(3): 362-369.
  3. Smith C. Applications of embryo transfer in animal breeding. Theriogenology, 1988, 29(1): 203-212 CrossRef
  4. Kruip T.A., Pieterse M.C., Van Beneden T.H., Vos P.L.A.M., Yurth Y.A., Taverne M.A.M. A new method for bovine embryo production: a potential alternative to superovulation. Vet. Rec., 1991, 128(9): 208-210.
  5. Ferré L., Kjelland M., Strøbech L., Hyttel P., Mermillod P., Ross P. Review: Recent advances in bovine in vitro embryo production: reproductive biotechnology history and methods. Animal, 2019, 14(5): 991-1004 CrossRef
  6. Chinarov R.Yu., Lukanina V.A. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2023, 37(9): 31-38 (in Russ.).
  7. Viana J.H.M. 2021 Statistics of embryo production and transfer in domestic farm animals. Embryo Technology Newsletter, 2022, 40(4): 22-40.
  8. Sirard M.-A., Richard F., Blondin P., Robert C. Contribution of the oocyte to embryo quality. Theriogenology, 2006, 65(1): 126-136 CrossRef
  9. Bols P.E., Van Soom A., Ysebaert M.T., Vandenheede J.M., de Kruif A. Effects of aspiration vacuum and needle diameter on cumulus oocyte complex morphology and developmental capacity of bovine oocytes. Theriogenology, 1996, 45(5): 1001-1014 CrossRef
  10. Bols P.E., Ysebaert M.T., Van Soom A., de Kruif A. Effects of needle tip bevel and aspiration procedure on the morphology and developmental capacity of bovine compact cumulus oocyte complexes. Theriogenology, 1997, 47(6): 1221-1236 CrossRef
  11. Ward F.A., Lonergan P., Enright B.P., Boland M.P. Factors affecting recovery and quality of oocytes for bovine embryo production in vitro using ovum pick-up technology. Theriogenology, 2000, 54(3): 433-446 CrossRef
  12. Pestis V.K., Golubets L.V., Deshko A.S., Kyssa I.S., Popov M.V. Doklady natsional’noy akademii nauk Belarusi, 2016, 60(1): 123-128 (in Russ.).
  13. Goodhand K.L., Staines M.E., Hutchinson J.S.M., Broadbent P.J. In vivo oocyte recovery and in vitro embryo production from bovine oocyte donors treated with progestagen, oestradiol and FSH. Animal Reproduction Science, 2000, 63(3-4): 145-158 CrossRef
  14. Pontes J.H.F., Nonato-Junior I., Sanches B.V., Ereno-Junior J.C., Uvo S., Barreiros T.R.R., Oliveira J.A., Hasler J.F., Seneda M.M. Comparison of embryo yield and pregnancy rate between in vivo and in vitro methods in the same Nelore (Bos indicus) donor cows. Theriogenology, 2009, 71(4): 690-697 CrossRef
  15. Aller J.F., Mucci N.C., Kaiser G.G., Ríos G., Callejas S.S., Alberio R.H. Transvaginal follicular aspiration and embryo development in superstimulated early postpartum beef cows and subsequent fertility after artificial insemination. Animal Reproduction Science, 2010, 119(1-2): 1-8 CrossRef
  16. Aller J.F., Mucci N.C., Kaiser G.G., Callejas S.S., Alberio R.H. Effect of repeated eCG treatments and ovum pick-up on ovarian response and oocyte recovery during early pregnancy in suckling beef cows. Animal Reproduction Science, 2012, 133: 10-15 CrossRef
  17. Oliveira L.H., Sanches C.P., Seddon A.S., Veras M.B., Lima F.A., Monteiro P.L.J. Jr., Wiltbank M.C., Sartori R. Short communication: Follicle superstimulation before ovum pick-up for in vitro embryo production in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, 99(11): 9307-9312 CrossRef
  18. Vieira L.M., Rodrigues C.A., Castro Netto A., Guerreiro B.M., Silveira C.R.A., Moreira R.J.C., Sá Filho M.F., Bó G.A., Mapletoft R.J., Baruselli P.S. Superstimulation prior to the ovum pick-up to improve in vitro embryo production in lactating and non-lactating Holstein cows. Theriogenology, 2014, 82(2): 318-324 CrossRef
  19. Vieira L.M., Rodrigues C.A., Castro Netto A., Guerreiro B.M., Silveira C.R.A., Freitas B.G., Bragança L.G.M., Marques K.N.G., Sá Filho M.F., Bó G.A., Mapletoft R.J., Baruselli P.S. Efficacy of a single intramuscular injection of porcine FSH in hyaluronan prior to ovum pick-up in Holstein cattle. Theriogenology, 2016, 85(5): 877-886 CrossRef
  20. Chinarov R.Yu., Lukanina V.A. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2022, 36(1): 46-50 (in Russ.).
  21. Golubets L.V., Deshko A.S., Kyssa I.S., Dragun T.Yu., Sekhina M.A., Kharitonik D.N. Zootekhnicheskaya nauki Belarusi: sbornik nauchnykh trudov, 2023, t. 58, ch. 1: 49-55 (in Russ.).
  22. Grachev V.S. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov po materialam mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii «Nauchnoe obespechenie razvitiya APK v usloviyakh importozameshcheniya» [Proc. Int. Conf. «Scientific basis for the development of the agro-industrial complex under import substitution»]. St. Petersburg, 2020, t. 1: 172-176 (in Russ.).
  23. Sarsadskikh A.A., Abramov S.V. Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo, 2015, 3: 29-32 (in Russ.).
  24. Kanitz W., Brüssow K.P., Becker F., Torner H., Schneider F., Kubelka M., Tomek W. Comparative aspects of follicular development, follicular and oocyte maturation and ovulation in cattle and pigs. Achieves of Animal Breeding, 2001, 44 (Special issue): 9-23.
  25. Kanitz W. Follicular dynamic and ovulation in cattle: a review. Archive Tierzucht, 2003, 46(2): 187-198 CrossRef
  26. Mossa F., Jimenez-Krassel F., Walsh S., Berry D.P., Butler S.T., Folger J., Smith G.W., Ireland J.L., Lonergan P., Ireland J.J., Evans A.C. Inherent capacity of the pituitary gland to produce gonadotropins is not influenced by the number of ovarian follicles ³3 mm in diameter in cattle. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 2010, 22: 550-557 CrossRef
  27. Mossa F., Walsh S.W., Butler S.T., Berry D.P., Carter F., Lonergan P., Smith G.W., Ireland J.J., Evans A.C. Low numbers of ovarian follicles ³3 mm in diameter are associated with low fertility in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2012, 95(5): 2355-2361 CrossRef
  28. Rüsse I. Oogenesis in cattle and sheep. Bibl. Anat., 1983, 24: 77-92.
  29. Erickson B.H. Development and senescence of the postnatal bovine ovary. Journal of Animal Science, 1966, 25(3): 800-805 CrossRef
  30. Evans A.C., Mossa F., Walsh S.W., Scheetz D., Jimenez-Krassel F., Ireland J.L., Smith G.W., Ireland J.J. Effects of maternal environment during gestation on ovarian folliculogenesis and consequences for fertility in bovine offspring. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2012, 47(Suppl. 4): 31-37 CrossRef
  31. Baymishev Kh.B. Veterinariya, 1999, 11: 33-34 (in Russ.).
  32. Lucy M.C., Staples C.R., Michel F.M., Thatcher W.W. Energy balance and size and number of ovarian follicles detected by ultrasonography in early postpartum dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74: 473-482.
  33. Varennikov M.V., Chomaev A.M., Oborin A.E. Upravlenie vosproizvodstvom v molochnom zhivotnovodstve [Reproduction management in dairy farming]. Izd. 2-e dopolnennoe. Moscow, 2014 (in Russ.).
  34. Gavrichenko N.I., Turchanova L.N. Aktual’nye problemy intensivnogo razvitiya zhivotnovodstva, 2014, 17(2): 193-198 (in Russ.).
  35. Murphy M.G., Enright W.J., Crowe M.A., McConnell K., Spicer L.J., Boland M.P., Roche J.F. Effect of dietary intake on pattern of growth of dominant follicles during the oestrous cycle in beef heifers. J. Reprod. Fert., 1991, 92(2): 333-338 CrossRef
  36. Hamilton S.A., Garverick H.A., Kesler D.H., Xu Z.Z., Loos K., Youngquist R.S., Salfen B.E. Characterization of ovarian follicular cysts and associated endocrine profiles in dairy cows. Biology of Reproduction, 1995, 53(4): 890-898 CrossRef
  37. Nezhdanov A.G. Veterinariya, 2003, 11: 32-36 (in Russ.).
  38. Kuz’mich R.G., Khodykin D.S., Garganchuk A.A., Bychkova T.K. Uchenye zapiski UO VGAVM, 2022, 58(2): 17-23 (in Russ.).
  39. Pereryadkina S.P., Avdeenko V.S., Kocharyan V.D., Kemeshev Zh.O. Izvestiya Nizhnevolzhskogo agrouniversitetskogo kompleksa: nauka i vysshee professional’noe obrazovanie, 2018, 2(50): 227-235 (in Russ.).
  40. Gavrichenko N.I., Levchenko A.A. Uchenye zapiski UO VGAVM, 2021, 57(1): 13-16 (in Russ.).
  41. Bungartz L., Lucas-Hahn A., Rath D., Nieman H. Collection of oocytes from cattle via follicular aspiration aided by ultrasound with or without gonadotropin pretreatment and in different reproductive stages. Theriogenology, 1995, 43(3): 667-675 CrossRef
  42. Lonergan P., Monaghan P., Rizos D., Boland M.P., Gordon I. Effect of follicle size on bovine oocyte quality and developmental competence following maturation, fertilization, and culture in vitro. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 1994, 37(1): 48-53 CrossRef
  43. Caixeta E.S., Ripamonte P., Franco M.M., Junior J.B., Dode M.A.N. Effect of follicle size on mRNA expression in cumulus cells and oocytes of Bos indicus: an approach to identify marker genes for developmental competence. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 2009, 21: 655-664 CrossRef
  44. Brevini Gandolfi T.A., Gandolfi F. The maternal legacy to the embryo: cytoplasmic components and their effects on early development. Theriogenology, 2001, 55(6): 1255-1276 CrossRef
  45. Dieleman S.J., Hendriksen P.J.M., Viuff D., Thomsen P.D., Hyttel P., Knijn H.M. Wrenzycki C., Kruip T.A.M., Niemann H., Gadella B.M., Bevers M.M., Vos P.L.A.M. Effects of in vivo prematuration and in vivo final maturation on developmental capacity and quality of pre-implantation embryos. Theriogenology, 2002, 57(1): 5-20 CrossRef
  46. Seneda M.M., Esper C.R., Garcia J.M., de Oliveira J.A., Vantini R. Relationship between follicle size and ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte recovery. Animal Reproduction Science, 2001, 67: 37-43 CrossRef
  47. Ginther O.J., Knopf L., Kastelic J.P. Temporal associations among ovarian events in cattle during oestrous cycles with two and three follicular waves. J. Reprod. Fert., 1989, 87: 223-230 CrossRef
  48. Ginther O.J., Wiltbank M.C., Fricke P.M., Gibbons J.R., Kot K. Selection of the dominant follicle in cattle. Biology of Reproduction, 1996, 55(6): 1187-1194 CrossRef
  49. Chinarov R.Yu., Lukanina V.A., Dzhagaev A.Yu., Singina G.N. Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo, 2023, 5: 24-27 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  50. Pieterse M.C., Vos P.L.A.M., Kruip T.A.M., Wurth Y.A., van Beneden T.H., Willemse A.H., Taverne M.A.M. Transvaginal ultrasound guided follicular aspiration of bovine oocytes. Theriogenology, 1991, 35(4): 19-24 CrossRef
  51. Hagemann L.J., Beaumont S.E., Berg M., Donnison M.J., Ledgard A., Peterson A.J., Schurmann A., Tervit H.R. Development during single IVP of bovine oocytes from dissected follicles: interactive effects of estrous cycle stage, follicle size and atresia. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 1999, 53: 451-458 CrossRef
  52. Hendriksen P.J., Steenweg W.N., Harkema J.C., Merton J.S., Bevers M.M, Vos P.L.A.M., Dieleman S.J. Effect of different stages of the follicular wave on in vitro developmental competence of bovine oocytes. Theriogenology, 2004, 61(5): 909-920 CrossRef
  53. Demissie T., Yilma T., Degefa T., Wirtu G., Lemma A. Effect of follicular ablation and gonadotropin priming on the recovery and quality of oocytes in Boran cows. International Journal of Veterinary Science and Research, 2021, 7(2): 138-143 CrossRef
  54. Gonçalves G.D., da Silva N.C., Costa C.B., Stolf R.L., de Almeida Rossignolo E.A., Cavalieri F.L.B., Morotti F., Seneda M.M. Relationship between the time of OPU and in vitro embryo production. Anim. Reprod., 2022, 19(2 spe): e22077.
  55. Pavlok A., Lucas-Hahn A., Niemann H. Fertilization and developmental competence of bovine oocytes derived from different categories of antral follicles. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 1992, 31(1): 63-67 CrossRef
  56. Blondin P., Sirard M.A. Oocyte and follicular morphology as determining characteristics for developmental competence in bovine oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 1995, 41(1): 54-62 CrossRef
  57. Qi M., Yao Y., Ma H., Wang J., Zhao X., Liu L., Tang X., Zhang L., Zhang S., Sun F. Transvaginal ultrasound guided Ovum Pick-up (OPU) in cattle. Journal of Biomimetics Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, 2013, 18(2): 1000118.
  58. Chinarov R.Yu., Lukanina V.A., Singina G.N., Taradaynik N.P. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2020, 34(2): 57-60 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  59. Golubets L.V. Uchenye zapiski UO VGAVM, 2021, 57(2): 87-91 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  60. Chaubal S.A., Molina J.A., Ohlrichs C.L., Ferre L.B., Faber D.C., Bols P.E.J., Riesen J.W., Tian X., Yang X. Comparison of different transvaginal ovum pick-up protocols to optimise oocyte retrieval and embryo production over a 10-week period. Theriogenology, 2006, 65(8): 1631-1648 CrossRef
  61. Lopes A.S., Martinussen T., Greve T., Callesen H. Effect of days post-partum, breed and ovum pick- up scheme on bovine oocyte recovery and embryo development. Reproduction of Domestic Animals, 2006, 41(3): 196-203 CrossRef
  62. Li F., Chen X., Pi W., Liu C., Shi Z. Collection of oocytes through transvaginal ovum pick-up for in vitro embryo production in Nanyang Yellow cattle. Reproduction of Domestic Animals, 2007, 42(6): 666-670 CrossRef
  63. Boni R., Roelofsen M.W.M., Pieterse M.C., Kogut I., Kruip T.A.M. Follicular dynamics, repeatability and predictability of follicular recruitment in cows submitted to repeated follicular puncture. Theriogenology, 1997, 48(2): 277-289 CrossRef
  64. Boni R., Zicarelli L., Kruip T.A.M. Impact of Ovum Pick-Up (OPU) technique for research and animal breeding. In: Reproduction and Animal Breeding: Advances and Strategy. G. Enne, G.F. Greppi, A. Lauria (eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995: 211-221.
  65. Simon L., Burgartz L., Rath D., Niemann H. Repeated bovine oocyte collection by means of a permanently rinsed ultrasound guided aspiration unit. Theriogenology, 1993, 39(1): 312 CrossRef
  66. Ding L.-J., Tian H.-B., Wang J.-J., Chen J., Sha H.-Y., Chen J.-Q., Cheng G.-X. Different intervals of ovum pick- up affect the competence of oocytes to support the preimplantation development of cloned bovine embryos. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 2008, 75(12): 1710-1715 CrossRef
  67. Ongaratto F.L., Rodriguez-Villamil P., Tribulo A., Bó G.A. Effect of follicle wave synchronization and gonadotropin treatments on the number and quality of cumulus-oocyte complex obtained by ultrasound-guided ovum pick-up in beef cattle. Anim. Reprod., 2015, 12(4): 876-883.
  68. Imai K., Tagawa M., Matoba S., Narita M., Kanayama K. Follicular growth, subsequent Ovum Pick-Up, and dominant follicle removal in cows. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 2006, 18(2): 246-246 CrossRef
  69. de Carvalho Fernandes C.A., Miyauchi T.M., Silva de Figueiredo A.C., Palhão M.P., Varago F.C., Nogueira E.S.C., Neves J.P., Miyauchi T.A. Hormonal protocols for in vitro production of Zebu and taurine embryos. Pesq. Agropec. Bras., 2014, 49(10): 813-817 CrossRef
  70. Cavalieri F.L.B., Morotti F., Seneda M.M., Colombo A.H.B., Andreazzi M.A., Emanuelli I.P., Rigolon L.P. Improvement of bovine in vitro embryo production by ovarian follicular wave synchronization prior to ovum pick-up. Theriogenology, 2018, 117: 57-60 CrossRef
  71. Caccia M., Bó G.A. Follicle wave emergence following treatment of CIDR-B implanted beef heifers with estradiol benzoate and progesterone. Theriogenology, 1998, 49(1): 341 CrossRef
  72. Dayan A., Watanabe M.R., Watanabe Y.F. Fatores que interferem na produção comercial de embriões FIV. Arquivos da Faculdade de Veterinária UFRGS, 2000, 28: 181-185.
  73. Bó G.A., Baruselli P.S., Martinez M.F. Pattern and manipulation of follicular development in Bos indicus cattle. Animal Reproduction Science, 2003, 78(3-4): 307-326 CrossRef
  74. Silva-Santos K.C., Siloto L.S., Santos G.M.G., Morotti F., Marcantonio T.N., Seneda M.M. Comparison of antral and preantral ovarian follicle populations between Bos indicus and Bos indicus taurus cows with high or low antral follicles counts. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2014, 49(1): 48-51 CrossRef
  75. Baruselli P.S., de Sa Filho M.F., Martins C.M., Nasser L.F., Nogueira M.F.G., Barros C.M., Bó G.A. Superovulation and embryo transfer in Bos indicus cattle. Theriogenology, 2006, 65(1): 77-88 CrossRef
  76. Bacelar D., Max M.C., Padilha L.C., Barreiros T.R.R., Seneda M.M. Incremento na obtenção de oócitos em novilhas Nelore (Bos taurus indicus) tratadas com progesterona injetável e benzoato de estradiol. Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 2010, 31(1): 163-172 CrossRef
  77. Denicol A.C., Lopes G., Mendonça L.G.D., Rivera F.A., Guagnini F., Perez R.V., Lima J.R., Bruno R.G.S., Santos J.E.P., Chebel R.C. Low progesterone concentration during the development of the first follicular wave reduces pregnancy per insemination of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 2012, 95(4): 1794-1806 CrossRef
  78. Goodhand K.L., Watt R.G., Stainer M.E., Hutchinson J.S.M., Broadbent J.P. In vivo oocyte recovery and in vitro embryo production from bovine donors aspirated at different frequencies or following FSH treatment. Theriogenology, 1999, 51(5): 951-961 CrossRef
  79. van de Leemput E.E., Vos P.L.A.M., Zeinstra E.C., Severs M.M., van der Weijden G.C., Dieleman S.J. Improved in vitro embryo development using in vivo matured oocytes from heifers superovulated with a controlled preovulatory LH surge. Theriogenology, 1999, 52(2): 335-349 CrossRef
  80. Blondin P., Vigneault C., Nivet A.L., Sirard M.A. Improving oocyte quality in cows and heifers — what have we learned so far? Anim Reprod., 2012, 9: 281-289.
  81. Mapletoft R., Pawlyshyn V., Garcia A., Bó G., Willmott N., Saunders J., Schmutz S. Comparison of four different gonadotropin treatments for inducing superovulation in cows with 1:29 translocation. Theriogenology, 1990, 33: 282.
  82. Monniaux D., Chupin D., Saumande J. Superovulatory responses of cattle. Theriogenology, 1983, 19(1): 55-81 CrossRef
  83. De Roover R., Bols P.E.J., Genicot G., Hanzen C.H. Characterisation of low, medium and high responders following FSH stimulation prior to ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval in cows. Theriogenology, 2005, 63(7): 1902-1913 CrossRef
  84. Singina G.N., Gavlichek V., Taradaynik N.P., Chinarov R.Yu., Taradaynik T.E., Shedova E.N. Molochnoe i myasnoe skotovodstvo, 2019, 6: 17-19 CrossRef (in Russ.).
  85. Goulding D., Williams D., Roche J., Boland M. Factors affecting superovulation in heifers treated with PMSG. Theriogenology, 1996, 45(4): 765-773 CrossRef
  86. Bó G.A., Mapletoft R.J. Historical perspectives and recent research on superovulation in cattle. Theriogenology, 2014, 81(1): 38-48 CrossRef
  87. Murphy B.D., Martinuk S.D. Equine chorionic gonadotropin. Endocrine Reviews, 1991, 12(1): 27-44 CrossRef
  88. Schams D., Menzer D., Schalenberger E., Hoffman B., Hahn J., Hahn R. Some studies of the pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin (PMSG) and on endocrine responses after application for superovulation in cattle. In: Control of reproduction in the cow. J.M. Sreenan (ed.). Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, 1978: 122-142.
  89. Mikel-Jenson A., Greve T., Madej A., Edqvist L.-E. Endocrine profiles and embryo quality in the PMSG-PGF2a-treated cow. Theriogenology, 1982, 18(1): 33-34 CrossRef
  90. Moor R., Kruip T., Green D. Intraovarian control of folliculogenesis: limits to superovulation? Theriogenology, 1984, 21(1): 103-116 CrossRef
  91. Greve T., Callesen H., Hyttel P., Hoier R., Assey R. The effects of exogenous gonadotropins on oocyte and embryo quality in cattle. Theriogenology, 1995, 43(1): 41-50 CrossRef
  92. Callesen H., Greve T., Hyttel P. Preovulatory endocrinology and oocyte maturation in superovulated cattle. Theriogenology, 1986, 25(1): 71-86 CrossRef
  93. Demoustier M.M., Beckers J.-Fr., Van Der Zwalmen P., Closset J., Gillard J.-L., Ectors F. Determination of porcine plasma follitropin levels during superovulation treatment in cows. Theriogenology, 1988, 30(2): 379-386 CrossRef
  94. Blondin P., Bousquet D., Twagiramungu H., Barnes F., Sirard M.-A. Manipulation of follicular development to produce developmentally competent bovine oocytes. Biology of Reproduction, 2002, 66(1): 38-43 CrossRef
  95. Nivet A.-L., Bunel A., Labrecque R., Belanger J., Vigneault C., Blondin P., Sirard M.-A. FSH withdrawal improves developmental competence of oocytes in the bovine model. Reproduction, 2012, 143(2): 165-171 CrossRef
  96. Arreseigor C.J., Gutiérrez-Reinoso M.A., Driedger B., Pereira A., Arza-Spinzi F., Garcia-Herreros M. Differential oocyte recovery rates after ovum pickup and in vitro embryo production in Charolais and Hereford cattle breeds. Anim Reprod., 2023, 20(2): 4.
  97. Sendag S., Cetin Y., Muhammet A., Hadeler K.G., Niemann H. Effects of eCG and FSH on ovarian response, recovery rate and number and quality of oocytes obtained by ovum pick-up in Holstein cows. Animal Reproduction Science, 2008, 106(1-2): 208-214 CrossRef
  98. Hiraizumi S., Nishinomiya H., Oikawa T., Sakagami N., Sano F., Nishino O., Kurahara T., Nishimoto N., Ishiyama O., Hasegawa Y., Hashiyada Y. Superovulatory response in Japanese Black cows receiving a single subcutaneous porcine follicle-stimulating hormone treatment or six intramuscular treatments over three days. Theriogenology, 2015, 83(4): 466-473 CrossRef
  99. Chasombat J., Sakhong D., Nagai T., Parnpai R., Vongpralub T. Superstimulation of follicular growth in Thai native heifers by a single administration of follicle stimulating hormone dissolved in polyvinylpyrrolidone. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 2013, 59(3): 214-218 CrossRef
  100. Hashimoto S., Kimura K., Kuramochi T., Aoyagi K., Hirako M., Kawaguchi M., Iwata H., Hirao M., Kitada K., Hirasawa K., Ueda M. Responsiveness of rabbits to superovulation treatment by a single injection of follicle-stimulating hormone with aluminum hydroxide gel. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 2007, 74(9): 1208-1212 CrossRef
  101. Tríbulo A., Rogan D., Tríbulo H., Tríbulo R., Mapletoft R.J., Bó G.A. Superovulation of beef cattle with a split-single intramuscular administration of Folltropin-V in two concentrations of hyaluronan. Theriogenology, 2012, 77(8): 1679-1685 CrossRef
  102. Ongaratto F.L., Tribulo A., Ramos M., Rodriguez P., Bó G.A. Oocyte recovery rates and in vitro blastocyst production in cattle treated with a single injection of folltropin-v diluted in a slow-release formulation. Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 2011, 23(1): 202-203 CrossRef
  103. Bó G.A. Simplified superstimulation programs for in vivo and in vitro embryo production in cattle. Proc. 31st World Buiatrics Congress. Madrid, 2022, K80: 56-57.
  104. Nasser L., Sá Filho M., Reis E., Rezende C., Mapletoft R., Bó G., Baruselli P.S. Exogenous progesterone enhances ova and embryo quality following superstimulation of the first follicular wave in Nelore (Bos indicus) donors. Theriogenology, 2011, 76(2): 320-327 CrossRef
  105. Rivera F., Mendonca L., Lopes G., Santos J., Perez R., Amstalden M., Correa-Calderón A., Chebel R.C. Reduced progesterone concentration during growth of the first follicular wave affects embryo quality but has no effect on embryo survival post-transfer in lactating dairy cows. Reproduction, 2011, 141(3): 333-342 CrossRef
  106. Ribas B.N., Missio D., Junior Roman I., Neto N.A., Claro I. Junior, dos Santos Brum D., Leivas F.G. Superstimulation with eCG prior to ovum pick-up improves follicular development and fertilization rate of cattle oocytes. Animal Reproduction Science, 2018, 195: 284-290 CrossRef
  107. Son D.-S., Choe C.-Y., Cho S.-R., Choi S.-H., Kim H.-J., Hur T.-Y., Jung Y.-G., Kang H.-G., Kim I.-M. A CIDR-based timed embryo transfer protocol increases the pregnancy rate of lactating repeat breeder dairy cows. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 2007, 53(6): 1313-1318 CrossRef
  108. Ferré L.B., Alvarez-Gallardo H., Romo S., Fresno C., Stroud T., Stroud B., Lindsey B., Kjelland M.E. Transvaginal ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval in cattle: State-of-the-art and its impact on the in vitro fertilization embryo production outcome. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2023, 58(3): 363-378 CrossRef
  109. Monniaux D., Barbey S., Rico C., Fabre S., Gallard Y., Larroque H. Anti-Müllerian hormone: a predictive marker of embryo production in cattle? Reproduction, Fertility and Development, 2010, 22(7): 1083-1091 CrossRef
  110. Mazzoni G., Salleh S.M., Freude K., Pedersen H.S., Stroebech L., Callesen H., Hyttel P., Kadarmideen H.N. Identification of potential biomarkers in donor cows for in vitro embryo production by granulosa cell transcriptomics. PLoS ONE, 2017, 12(4): e0175464 CrossRef
  111. Kowsar R., Komeili M., Sadeghi N., Sadeghi K. Multistep analysis reveals the relationship between blood indices at the time of ovum pick-up and in vitro embryo production in heifers. Theriogenology, 2021, 159: 153-164 CrossRef
  112. Umer S., Zhao S.J., Sammad A., Sahlu B.W., Pang Y., Zhu H. AMH: Could it be used as a biomarker for fertility and superovulation in domestic animals? Genes, 2019, 10(12): 1009 CrossRef
  113. Stojsin-Carter A., Mahboubi K., Costa N.N., Gillis D.J., Carter T.F., Neal M.S., Miranda M.S., Ohashi O.M., Favetta L.A., King W.A. Systemic and local anti-Mullerian hormone reflects differences in the reproduction potential of Zebu and European type cattle. Animal Reproduction Science, 2016, 167: 51-58 CrossRef

 

back

 


CONTENTS

 

 

Full article PDF (Rus)

Full article PDF (Eng)