PLANT BIOLOGY
ANIMAL BIOLOGY
SUBSCRIPTION
E-SUBSCRIPTION
 
MAP
MAIN PAGE

 

 

 

 

Betekhtin K.E., Sazonova O.I., Sokolov S.L., Kovalev L.I., Kovaleva M.A., Mashentseva N.G., Neretina A.N. New identified Bacillus licheniformis isolates ensure enzymatic biodegradation of feathers into a feed additive. Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya Biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2024, Vol. 59, № 2, p. 385-406.
(how to cite this article)

doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2024.2.385eng

UDC: 636.085.57:579.6

Acknowledgements:
Part of the work was carried out on the equipment of the Shared Use Center of the Federal Research Center of Biotechnology RAS

Supported financially by the Innovation Promotion Fund under the program UMNIK-21 (Cherkizovo) No. 17035GU/2021 of June 16, 2021

 

NEW IDENTIFIED Bacillus licheniformis ISOLATES ENSURE ENZYMATIC BIODEGRADATION OF FEATHERS INTO A FEED ADDITIVE

K.E. Betekhtin1 ✉, O.I. Sazonova2, S.L. Sokolov2, L.I. Kovalev3,
M.A. Kovaleva3, N.G. Mashentseva1, A.N. Neretina4

1Russian Biotechnological University (ROSBIOTECH), 11,Volokolamskjt sh., Moscow 125080 Russia, e-mail: r9d2@mail.ru (✉ corresponding author), natali-mng@yandex.ru;
2Skryabin Institute of Biochemistry and Physiology of Microorganisms RAS — a separate subdivision of the Federal Research Center Pushchino Scientific Center for Biological Research RAS, 5, Prospekt Nauki, Pushchino 142290 Russia, e-mail SLS@ibpm.ru, sazonova_oi@rambler.ru;
3Federal Research Center for Biotechnology, Bakh Institute of Biochemistry RAS, 33/2, Leninskii prosp., Moscow, 119071 Russia, e-mail kovalyov@inbi.ras.ru, m1968@mail.ru;
4Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, 33/1, Leninskii prosp., Moscow, 119071 Russia, e-mail neretina-anna@yandex.ru

ORCID:

Betehtin K.E. orcid.org/0000-0002-1687-9801
Kovaleva M.A. orcid.org/0000-0002-3486-212
Sazonova O.I. orcid.org/0000-0002-2767-2312
Mashentseva N.Р. orcid.org/0000-0002-9287-0585
Sokolov S.L. orcid.org/0000-0002-2775-1248
Neretina А.Н. orcid.org/0000-0002-6876-079X
Kovalev L.I. orcid.org/0000-0001-6519-8247

Final revision received April 07, 2023
Accepted May 03, 2023

 

Feather waste biodegradation by keratinolytic microorganisms is an alternative to convert feather into nutritionally valuable feed additives and an attractive way to prevent environmental pollution. Cytolytic proteases are used to produce rare amino acids (proline, serine and cysteine). Bacterial hydrolysate of feathers can serve as an ingredient in animal feed or as an organic fertilizer, thereby reducing the impact of poultry waste on the environment. In this work, for the first time, it was found that with this method of pen processing by the Bacillus licheniformis BAL-2 strain, which uses the feather as the only carbon source, free keratin is completely converted nto digestible peptides and essential amino acids. The aim of the work is to study the morphological, physiological-biochemical and molecular-genetic properties of Bacillus licheniformis strains BAL-1 and BAL-2, their identification and use for fermentation of broiler chicken feathers. Bacillus licheniformis strains BAL-1 (VKPM B-14243) and BAL-2 (VKPM B-14244) are natural isolates from sediments of the Gulf of Finland of the Baltic Sea, Kandikul village. Ross-308 chicken feather (PJSC Cherkizovo Group Poultry Processing Complex Konstantinovo, Moscow Province, Ramenskoye District, Konstantinovo village) obtained from an industrial bird plucking line, had blood inclusions, humidity 75 % and was used for fermentation 24 hours after delivery. The morphotypes of B. licheniformis colonies were determined on Trypton soybean agar. The genomic DNA was isolated using a GeneJET Genomic DNAPurification Kit («Thermo Scientific», Lithuania). The 16S rDNA fragment was amolified by PCR with primers specific to the 16S rRNA genes of eubacteria: 8f 5'-AGAGTTTGATCMTGGCTCAG-3' and 1492r 5'-TACGGHTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3'. The analysis of the identity of nucleotide sequences was performed using the BLASTN program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST). Feather (5 g) was added to a flask with 100 cm3 of mineral-nutrient medium. B. licheniformis BAL-1 or BAL-2 was introduced into the mineral medium to a final concentration of 1×106 CFU/cm3. Fermentation was carried out for 72 hours at 28 °C and constant stirring. Keratinase activity was determined in the culture fluid using a keratin suspension. The enzyme solution (1 cm3) was added to the keratin suspension (1 cm3) in the reaction buffer. After 1 hour of incubation at 37 °C, the reaction was stopped by adding 2 cm3 of 5 % TCA and the solution was filtered. The fermented feather was examined by scanning electron microscopy. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis was performed according to O’Farrell’s procedure with isoelectrofocusing in the ampholine pH gradient (IEF-PAGE); proteins were detected by staining with Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 and silver nitrate. For 2D electrophoresis, 100 mg portion of the crushed feather was homogenized in 2 cm3 of the lysing solution. The homogenate was clarified by centrifugation, the supernatant fraction containing protein extract was used for fractioning in equal applications of 50-75 µl. After trypsinolysis, protein fractions were identified by MALDI-TOF and MS/MS mass spectrometry (Ultraflex mass spectrometer, Bruker Daltonics GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) with a UV laser (l = 336 nm) in the detection mode of positive ions in the mass range 500-8000 Da. Thin-layer paper chromatography was performed according to GOST 28366-89. The total nitrogen content in the dried feather after fermentation was evaluated by the Kjeldahl method. Genomic fingerprint was carried out by rep-PCR with primers Rep1R-I and Rep2-I ERIC-PCR (a set of primers ERIC1R and ERIC2), ERIC2-PCR, the primer ERIC2, BOX-PCR, the primer BOX A1R, and (GTG)5-PCR, the primer (GTG)5. To prepare DNA matrices, individual colonies were selected, suspended in 20 µl of deionized water, and processed for 2 minutes in a microwave oven at maximum power. The resulting preparations were stored at 20 °C, then thawed and used in PCR. According to the results of the analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the 16S rRNA gene, it was found that the strains BAL-1 and BAL-2 belong to the species Bacillus licheniformis. The strains are able to grow up to 1×108 CFU/cm3 on a mineral medium with chicken feather as a single carbon source. By serial dilutions, 16 morphotypes of colonies were identified, 10 for B. licheniformis BAL-1, and 6 for B. licheniformis BAL-2. The preservation of the identified morphotypes in culture fluid was confirmed by PCR-based genomic fingerprint. The keratinase activity of B. licheniformis BAL-1 was 16.2±0.3 KA/cm3, of BAL-2, 18.3±0.2 KA/cm3. The ability of B. licheniformis keratinases to convert indigestible chicken feather keratin into digestible peptides occurred due to a complete decomposition of free keratin by BAL-2 strain and partial decomposition by BAL-1 strain. It was shown by 2D electrophoresis and mass spectrometric identification. Hydrolysis of the feather by keratinase enzymes was visualized by scanning electron microscopy. B. licheniformis completely decomposed the grooves and destructed feather rod. The presence of lysine, threonine, methionine, valine, and phenylalanine in the hydrolysate was confirmed by thin-layer chromatography. The nitrogen content for B. licheniformis BAL-1 was 72.41 % DM, for B. licheniformis BAL-2 76.38 % DM. Our findings show the prospects for the use B. licheniformis BAL-2 for feather fermentationto produce a feed additive for broilers.

Keywords: keratin-containing raw materials, feather processing, keratinase, Bacillus licheniformis.

 

REFERENCES

      1. Alexander P., Brown C., Arneth A., Finnigan J., Moran D., Rounsevell M.D.A. Losses, inefficiencies and waste in the global food system. Agricultural Systems, 2017, 153: 190-200 CrossRef
      2. Korniłłowicz-Kowalska T., Bohacz J. Biodegradation of keratin waste: theory and practical aspects. Waste Management, 2011, 31(8): 1689-1701 CrossRef
      3. Papadopoulos M.C. Processed chicken feathers as feedstuff for poultry and swine. A review. Agricultural Wastes, 1985, 14(4): 275-290 CrossRef
      4. Tiwary E., Gupta R. Rapid conversion of chicken feather to feather meal using dimeric keratinase from Bacillus licheniformis ER-15. Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques, 2012, 2(4): 1000123 CrossRef
      5. Gupta R., Ramnani P. Microbial keratinases and their prospective applications: an overview. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2006, 70(1): 21-33 CrossRef
      6. Colla G., Hoagland L., Ruzzi M., Cardarelli M., Bonini P., Canaguier R., Rouphael Y. Biostimulant action of protein hydrolysates: unraveling their effects on plant physiology and microbiome. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 2202 CrossRef
      7. Callegaro K., Brandelli A., Daroit D.J. Beyond plucking: feathers bioprocessing into valuable protein hydrolysates. Waste Management, 2019, 95: 399-415 CrossRef
      8. Bhari R., Kaur M., Sarup Singh R. Chicken feather waste hydrolysate as a superior biofertilizer in agroindustry. Current Microbiology, 2021, 78(6): 2212-2230 CrossRef
      9. Nnolim N.E., Okoh A.I., Nwodo U.U. Bacillus sp. FPF-1 produced keratinase with high potential for chicken feather degradation. Molecules, 2020, 25(7): 1505 CrossRef
      10. Akram F., ul Haq I., Jabbar Z. Production and characterization of a novel thermo-and detergent stable keratinase from Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 with perceptible applications in leather processing and laundry industries. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2020, 164: 371-383 CrossRef
      11. Holkar C.R., Jain S.S., Jadhav A.J., Pinjari D.V. Valorization of keratin-based waste. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018, 115: 85-98 CrossRef
      12. Costa J.C., Barbosa S.G., Sousa D.Z. Effects of pre-treatment and bioaugmentation strategies on the anaerobic digestion of chicken feathers. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 120: 114-119 CrossRef
      13. Swetlana N., Jain P.C. Feather degradation by strains of Bacillus isolated from decomposing feathers. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 2010, 41(1): 196-200 CrossRef
      14. Bielorai R., Iosif B., Neumark H., Alumot E. Low nutritional value of feather-meal protein for chicks. The Journal of Nutrition, 1982, 112(2): 249-254 CrossRef
      15. Mazotto A.M., de Melo A.C.N., Macrae A., Rosado A.S., Peixoto R., Cedrola S.M.L., Couri S., Zingali R.B., Villa A.L.V., Rabinovitch L., Chaves J.Q., Vermelho A.B. Biodegradation of feather waste by extracellular keratinases and gelatinases from Bacillus spp. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 27(6): 1355-1365 CrossRef
      16. Ire F.S., Onyenama A.C. Effects of some cultural conditions on keratinase production by Bacillus licheniformis Strain NBRC 14206. Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology, 2017: 1-13. CrossRef
      17. Fisinin V.I., Lukashenko V.S., Saleeva I.P., Volik V.G., Ismailova D.Yu., Ovseychik E.A., Zhuravchuk E.V. The effects of enzymatic hydrolysates of feathers and collagen in diets for broiler chicks (Gallus gallus L.) on meat quality. Sel'skokhozyaistvennaya biologiya [Agricultural Biology], 2021, 56(2): 384-399 CrossRef
      18. Karthikeyan R, Balaji S, Sehgal P. Industrial applications of keratins — a review. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 2007, 66: 710-715.
      19. Gousterova A., Nustorova M., Goshev I., Christov P., Braikova D., Tishinov K., Nedkov P. Alkaline hydrolysate of waste sheep wool aimed as fertilizer. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment, 2003, 17(2): 140-145 CrossRef
      20. Cao Z.-J., Lu D., Luo L.-S., Deng Y.-X., Bian Y.-G., Zhang X.-Q., Zhou M.-H. Composition analysis and application of degradation products of whole feathers through a large scale of fermentation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2012, 19(7): 2690-2696 CrossRef
      21. Bertsch A., Coello N. A biotechnological process for treatment and recycling poultry feathers as a feed ingredient. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(15): 1703-1708 CrossRef
      22. Williams C.M., Lee C.G., Garlich J.D., Shih J.C.H. Evaluation of a bacterial feather fermentation product, feather-lysate, as a feed protein. Poultry Science, 1991, 70(1): 85-94 CrossRef
      23. Friedrich A.B., Antranikian G. Keratin degradation by Fervidobacterium pennavorans, a novel thermophilic anaerobic species of the order Thermotogales. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1996, 62(8): 2875-2882 CrossRef
      24. Williams C.M., Shih J.C.H. Enumeration of some microbial groups in thermophilic poultry waste digesters and enrichment of a feather‐degrading culture. Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 1989, 67(1): 25-35 CrossRef
      25. Williams C.M., Richter C.S., MacKenzie Jr J.M., Shih J.C. Isolation, identification, and characterization of a feather-degrading bacterium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1990, 56(6): 1509-1515 CrossRef
      26. Matsui T., Yamada Y., Mitsuya H., Shigeri Y., Yoshida Y., Saito Y., Matsui H., Watanabe K. Sustainable and practical degradation of intact chicken feathers by cultivating a newly isolated thermophilic Meiothermus ruber H328. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2009, 82(5): 941-950 CrossRef
      27. Wang T., Liang C., Sun Y., Gao W., Luo X., Gao Q., Li R., Fu S., Xu H., He T., Yuan H. Strategical isolation of efficient chicken feather-degrading bacterial strains from tea plantation soil sample. International Microbiology, 2019, 22(2): 227-237 CrossRef
      28. Li Z.-W., Liang S., Ke Y., Deng J.-J., Zhang M.-S., Lu D.-L., Li J.-Z., Luo X.-C. The feather degradation mechanisms of a new Streptomyces sp. isolate SCUT-3. Communications Biology, 2020, 3(1): 191 CrossRef
      29. Bhari R., Kaur M., Singh R.S. Nutritional enhancement of chicken feather waste by Bacillus aerius NSMk2. Indian Journal of Microbiology, 2020, 60(4): 518-525 CrossRef
      30. Ouled Haddar H., Zaghloul T.I., Saeed H.M. Biodegradation of native feather keratin by Bacillus subtilis recombinant strains. Biodegradation, 2009, 20(5): 687-694 CrossRef
      31. He Z., Sun R., Tang Z., Bu T., Wu Q., Li C., Chen H. Biodegradation of feather waste keratin by the keratin-degrading strain Bacillus subtilis 8. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2018, 28(2): 314-322 CrossRef
      32. Ramakrishna Reddy M., Sathi Reddy K., Ranjita Chouhan Y., Bee H., Reddy G. Effective feather degradation and keratinase production by Bacillus pumilus GRK for its application as bio-detergent additive. Bioresource Technology, 2017, 243: 254-263 CrossRef
      33. Bihari Z., Vidéki D., Mihalik E., Szvetnik A., Szabó Z., Balázs M., Kesseru P., Kiss I. Degradation of native feathers by a novel keratinase-producing, thermophilic isolate, Brevibacillus thermoruber T1E. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung. C, Journal of Biosciences, 2010, 65(1-2): 134-140 CrossRef
      34. Werlang P.O., Brandelli A. Characterization of a novel feather-degrading Bacillus sp. strain. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2005, 120(1): 71-79 CrossRef
      35. El-Naghy M.A., El-Ktatny M.S., Fadl-Allah E.M., Nazeer W.W. Degradation of chicken feathers by Chrysosporium georgiae. Mycopathologia, 1998, 143(2): 77-84 CrossRef
      36. Zaghloul T.I., Embaby A.M., Elmahdy A.R. Biodegradation of chicken feathers waste directed by Bacillus subtilis recombinant cells: scaling up in a laboratory scale fermentor. Bioresource technology, 2011, 102(3): 2387-2393 CrossRef
      37. Peng Z., Mao X., Zhang J., Du G., Chen J. Effective biodegradation of chicken feather waste by co-cultivation of keratinase producing strains. Microbial Cell Factories, 2019, 18(1): 84 CrossRef
      38. Onifade A.A., Al-Sane N.A., Al-Musallam A.A., Al-Zarban S. Potentials for biotechnological applications of keratin-degrading microorganisms and their enzymes for nutritional improvement of feathers and other keratins as livestock feed resources. Bioresource Technology, 1998, 66(1): 1-11 CrossRef
      39. Evans C.G.T., Herbert D., Tempest D.W. Chapter XIII. The continuous cultivation of microorganisms. 2. Construction of a chemostat. In:  Methods in Microbiology, vol. 2. J.R. Norris, D.W. Ribbons (eds.). Academic Press, 1970, 2: 277-327 CrossRef
      40. Ulucay O., Gormez A., Ozic C. Identification, characterization and hydrolase producing performance of thermophilic bacteria: geothermal hot springs in the Eastern and Southeastern Anatolia Regions of Turkey. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2022, 115(2): 253-270 CrossRef
      41. Weisburg W.G., Barns S.M., Pelletier D.A., Lane D.J. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. Journal of Bacteriology, 1991, 173(2): 697-703 CrossRef
      42. Grzywnowicz G., Lobarzewski J., Wawrzkiewicz K., Wolski T. Comparative characterization of proteolytic enzymes from Trichophyton gallinae and Trichophyton verrucosum. Journal of Medical and Veterinary Mycology, 1989, 27(5): 319-328 CrossRef
      43. Zav’yalova N.E., Tekleva M.V., Polevova S.V., Bogdanov A.G. Issledovanie palinologicheskikh ob’‘ektov metodom elektronnoy mikroskopii [Study of palynological objects using electron microscopy]. Moscow, 2018 (in Russ.).
      44. Zvereva E.A., Kovalev L.I., Ivanov A.V., Kovaleva M.A., Zherdev A.V., Shishkin S.S., Lisitsin A.B., Chernukha I.M., Dzantiev B.B. Enzyme immunoassay and proteomic characterization of troponin I as a marker of mammalian muscle compounds in raw meat and some meat products. Meat Science, 2015, 105: 46-52 CrossRef
      45. Versalovic J., Schneider M., de Bruijn F.J., Lupski J.R. Genomic fingerprinting of bacteria using repetitive sequence based polymerase chain reaction. Methods in Molecular and Cellular Biology, 1994, 5(1): 25-40.
      46. GRAS Notices. Bacillus licheniformis. Available: https://www.cfsanappsexternal.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=GRASNotices&sort=GRN_No&order=DESC&startrow=1&type=basic&search=Bacillus%20licheniformis. Accessed: 03/22/2022.
      47. Haq I.U., Akram F., Jabbar Z. Keratinolytic enzyme-mediated biodegradation of recalcitrant poultry feathers waste by newly isolated Bacillus sp. NKSP-7 under submerged fermentation. Folia Microbiologica, 2020, 65(5): 823-834 CrossRef
      48. Jeong J.-H., Jeon Y.-D., Lee O.-M., Kim J.-D., Lee N.-R., Park G.-T., Son H.-J. Characterization of a multifunctional feather-degrading Bacillus subtilis isolated from forest soil. Biodegradation, 2010, 21(6): 1029-1040 CrossRef
      49. Yusuf I., Ahmad S.A., Phang L.Y., Syed M.A., Shamaan N.A., Khalil K.A., Dahalan F.A., Shukor M.Y. Keratinase production and biodegradation of polluted secondary chicken feather wastes by a newly isolated multi heavy metal tolerant bacterium-Alcaligenes sp. AQ05-001. Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 183(1): 182-195 CrossRef
      50. Fakhfakh N., Kanoun S., Manni L., Nasri M. Production and biochemical and molecular characterization of a keratinolytic serine protease from chicken feather-degrading Bacillus licheniformis RPk. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2009, 55(4): 427-436 CrossRef
      51. Wang J.-J., Shih J.C.H. Fermentation production of keratinase from Bacillus licheniformis PWD-1 and a recombinant B. subtilis FDB-29. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1999, 22(6): 608-616 CrossRef
      52. Grazziotin A., Pimentel F.A., Sangali S., de Jong E.V., Brandelli A. Production of feather protein hydrolysate by keratinolytic bacterium Vibrio sp. kr2. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(16): 3172-3175 CrossRef
      53. Shapiro J.A. The significances of bacterial colony patterns. Bioessays, 1995, 17(7): 597-607 CrossRef
      54. Di Franco C., Beccari E., Santini T., Pisaneschi G., Tecce G. Colony shape as a genetic trait in the pattern-forming Bacillus mycoides. BMC Microbiology, 2002, 2: 33 CrossRef
      55. Rudner R., Martsinkevich O., Leung W., Jarvis E.D. Classification and genetic characterization of pattern-forming Bacilli. Molecular Microbiology, 1998, 27(4): 687-703 CrossRef
      56. Shapiro J.A. Thinking about bacterial populations as multicellular organisms. Annual Review of Microbiology, 1998, 52(1): 81-104 CrossRef
      57. Rademaker J.L.W., Louws F.J., Versalovic J., de Bruijn F.J. Characterization of the diversity of ecological important microbes by rep-PCR genomic fingerprinting. In: Molecular microbial ecologymanual, second edition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2004, Chapter 5.3.2: 1-33.
      58. Baldy-Chudzik K. Rep-PCR — a variant to RAPD or an independent technique of bacteria genotyping? A comparison of the typing properties of rep-PCR with other recognised methods of genotyping of microorganisms. Acta Microbiol. Pol., 2001, 50(3-4): 89-204.
      59. Hulton C.S.J., Higgins C.F., Sharp P.M. ERIC sequences: a novel family of repetitive elements in the genomes of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium and other enteric bacteria. Molecular Microbiology, 1991, 5(4): 825-834 CrossRef
      60. Versalovic J., Koeuth T., Lupski R. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 1991, 19(24): 6823-6831 CrossRef
      61. Martin B., Humbert O., Camara M., Guenzi E., Walker J., Mitchell T., Andrew P., Prudhomme M., Alloing G., Hakenbeck R., Morrison A.D., Boulnois G.J., Claverys J.-P. A highly conserved repeated DNA element located in the chromosome of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nucleic Acids Research, 1992, 20(13): 3479-3483 CrossRef
      62. Villa A.L.V., Aragão M.R.S., dos Santos E.P., Mazotto A.M., Zingali R.B., de Souza E.P., Vermelho A.B. Feather keratin hydrolysates obtained from microbial keratinases: effect on hair fiber. BMC Biotechnology, 2013, 13: 15 CrossRef

 

back

 


CONTENTS

 

 

Full article PDF (Rus)

Full article PDF (Eng)