doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2018.2.309eng

UDC 636.2:636.082:591.111.1:616-097

 

THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN BLOOD GROUP AND REPRODUCTIVE
PERFORMANCE IN CATTLE

O.S. Shatalina

Ural Research Institute of Agriculture, Federal Agency of Scientific Organizations, 21, ul. Glavnaya, pos. Istok,Ekaterinburg,620061 Russia, e-mail shatalinao@list.ru (✉ corresponding author)

ORCID:
Shatalina O.S. orcid.org/0000-0002-9796-7677

Received May 13, 2016

 

Modern development of animal breeding is impossible without the implementation of molecular genetic methods, the use of which allows searching for reliable biomarkers of the desired development of economically useful traits in farm animals based on the analysis of hereditary information. Thus, immunogenetic methods allowed significant reduction of errors in the control of pedigree of breeders. Studies of the interrelationships of blood groups with economically useful signs of animals are in progress. Infertility and barrenness in cattle lead to huge economic losses. The purpose of this work was to identify the relationship between antigenic similarity of blood groups in parents and reproduction indicators in cattle. The study was carried out from 2009 to 2014 in Sverdlovsk Region in the livestock farms Mezenskoe LLC (Beloyarsky Region), Pervouralsky Integrated Agricultural Production Center (Pervouralsk Town District) and Artemovsky Farming Company LLC (Artemovsky Region) using 1300 pairs of Ural-type black-and-white cattle. The mated animals were authentic in origin and certified for blood groups. For their certification, 54 monospecific sera to 11 blood group systems were used. In mated animals the index of antigenic similarity of blood groups, expressed as the ratio of similar antigens in bulls and cows to their total number, and homozygosity on EAA, EAF, and EAZ blood group systems were calculated. These blood group systems were represented by several antigens which makes it possible to trace immune conflict in mated animals. By biometrical processing, it was identified that the pairs which were heterozygous in EAA and EAF antigens showed higher efficiency of conception and better survival of the offspring, though the twinning frequency decreased. The parents homozygous in EAA system produced the progeny in which the amount of aborted embryos was 2.5 % higher than that in the heterozygous pairs. The number of calves born dead from the EAF-homozygous pairs was twice as much as that of heterozygous pairs. Apparently, the immune conflict, which leads to the extended period from delivery to productive insemination and higher offspring death, decreases in animals homozygous in EAZ system. The number of calves born dead was 3.2 % for homozygous pairs and 4.7 % for heterozygous pairs. The index of antigenic similarity of parents varied from 0.1 to 0.8. If the antigenic similarity of the mated animals was 10 %, significant losses of calves were observed. If the antigenic similarity was 20 %, such losses increased but not significantly. The similar patterns were observed for the twinning. If the index of antigenic similarity of the mated animals was from 0 to 0.1, the maximum twins were born, and if the index of similarity was 0.2 or more, the number of twins increased, but gradually. Thus, the antigenic similarity of mated animals influences the number and survival of born calves.

Keywords: cattle, antigens, blood groups, index of antigenic similarity, homozygosity, multiple fetus, survival of calves.

 

Full article (Rus)

Full article (Eng)

 

 

REFERENCES

  1. PalaniappanS. Blood grouping in animals. The Hindu Online edition of India's National Newspaper, 2004, 9: 61.
  2. Shukyurova E.B. Open Scientific Bulletin, 2014, 1: 1-5 (in Russ.).
  3. Foster M. Genomanaliyse. In: Tierzucht und allgemeine Landwirtschaftslehre fur Tiermediziner. H. Kräusslich, G. Brem (eds.). Enke, 1997: 77-109.
  4. Buvaeva N.V. Ispol'zovanie grupp krovi v selektsii krupnogo rogatogo skota kalmytskoi porody. Avtoreferat kandidatskoi dissertatsii. [Use of blood groups in the selection of cattle of Kalmyk breed. PhD Thesis]. Stavropol', 2012 (in Russ.).
  5. Charoensook R., Knorr C., Brenig B., Gatphayak K. Thai pigs and cattle production, genetic diversity of livestock and strategies for preserving animal genetic resources. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Tech., 2013, 1: 113-132.
  6. Serdyuk G.N., Katalupov A.G. Zootekhniya, 2008, 8: 8-10 (in Russ.).
  7. Neves J.P., Miranda K.L., Tortorella R.D. Scientific progress in reproduction research during the first decade of XXI century. Revista brasileira de zootecnia, 2010, 1: 414-421 (in Russ.).
  8. Van Eetvelde M., Heras S., Leroy J.L.M.R., Van Soom A., Opsomer G. The importance of the periconception period: immediate effects in cattle breeding and in assisted reproduction such as artificial insemination and embryo transfer. In: Periconception in physiology and medicine. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. A. Fazeli, W. Holt (eds.). Springer, Cham, 2017, V. 1014: 41-68 CrossRef
  9. Shkuratova I.A., Donnik I.M., Nevinnyi V.K., Shusharin A.D., Vereshchak N.A., Ryaposova M.V., Belyaev I.P., Sbitnev E.V. Veterinariya, 2007, 7: 14-15 (in Russ.).
  10. Purfield D.C., Bradley D.G., Berry D.P., Evans R.D., Kearney F.J. Genome-wide association study for calving performance using high-density genotypes in dairy and beef cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol., 2015, 1: 47 CrossRef
  11. Oleshko V.P., Babenko E.I. Tekhnolog│ya virobnitstva │ pererobki produkts│┐ tvarinnitstva, 2014, 1: 66-69 (in Russ.).
  12. Fisher M., Small B., Roth H., Mallon M., Jerebine B. What do individuals in different science groups within a life sciences organization think about genetic modification? Public Underst. Sci., 2005, 3: 317-326 CrossRef
  13. Rodríguez F.M., Salvetti N.R., Panzani C.G., Ortega H.H., Rey F., Barbeito C.G. Influence of insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins-2 and -3 in the pathogenesis of cystic ovarian disease in cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 2011, 1-4: 1-10 CrossRef 
  14. Kumar V., Chakravarty A.K. Genetic disorders in dairy cattle: an Indian perspective. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 2015, 8: 819-827.
  15. Shendakov A. Improvement system of biological factors management in the breeding of farm animals. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences, 2012, 12: 3-18.
  16. Masalov V.N., Enin Yu.M., Sinitsyn A.N., Kozlov A.S. Vestnik Orlovskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta, 2007, 1: 23 (in Russ.).
  17. Gukezhev V.M., Gabaev M.S., Batyrova O.A. Agrarnyi vestnik Urala, 2012, 7: 42-44 (in Russ.).
  18. Flisikowski K., Schwarzenbacher H., Fries R., Venhoranta H., Flyckt A., Taponen J., Andersson M., Nowacka-Woszuk J., Szczerbal I. Switonski M., Mckay S.D., Schnabel R., Taylor J.F., Lohi H. A novel mutation in the maternally imprinted PEG3 domain results in a loss of MIMT1 expression and causes abortions and stillbirths in cattle (Bos taurus). PLoS ONE, 2010, 11: e15116 CrossRef
  19. Wolf E., Bauersachs S. Functional genome research in reproductive biology and biotechnology — a minireview. Animal Sci. P., 2010, 2: 123-132.
  20. Gabaev M.S., Gukezhev V.M. Plodovitost' i plemennaya tsennost' korov. Agrarnyi vestnik Urala, 2011, 7: 33-34.
  21. Musallyamova M.F., Antonova N.V. Calculation of product costs of dairy cattle breeding in Russia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2014, 24: 403-406 CrossRef
  22. Pronina M.Yu. Uchetnye zapisi Kazanskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii veterinarnoi meditsiny imeni N.E. Baumana, 2012, 12: 358 (in Russ.).
  23. Ilshatovna S.A., Vildanovna N.R. Application of fuzzy-set and multiple approaches in evaluation of effectiveness of agricultural industry enterprises activities (as an example of animal breeding of the Republic of Tatarstan). Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia, 2014, 11: 37-42.
  24. Smith R.L., Groen Y.T., Strawderman R.L., Schukken Y.H., Pradhan A.K., Wells S.J., Espejo L.A., Whitkock R.H., Van Kessel J.S., Smith J.M., Wolfgang D.R. Effect of Johnes disease status on reproduction and culling in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 2010, 8: 3513-3524 CrossRef
  25. Bozymov K.K., Nassambayev E., Bayakhov A.N., Upievich B.Y., Sultanova A.K. Experience of using ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cattle reproductive track diseases in the West Kazakhstan region. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, 2015, 1: 21-25 CrossRef
  26. Wickramasinghe S., Rincon G., Medrano J.F. Variants in the pregnancy-associated plasma protein-a2 gene on Bos taurus autosome 16 are associated with daughter calving ease and productive life in holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 2011, 3: 1552-1558 CrossRef
  27. Goncharenko I.V., Vinnichuck D.T. Haukovii v│snik NUB│P Ukra┐ni. Ser│ya: Tekhnolog│ya virobnitstva │ pererobki produkts│┐ tvarinnitstva, 2015, 205: 264-273 (in Russ.).
  28. Bushueva ▓.V., Knysh E.G., Panasenko O.▓. Dosl│dzhennya l│kuval'no┐ efektivnost│ morfol│n│i 2-[5-(p│ridin-4-│l)-1,2,4-tr│azol-3-│lt│o] atsetatu pri khvorobakh deyakikh vid│v tvarin. Sciencerise, 2014, 1: 100-104.
  29. Aleshkin V.A., Lozhkina A.N., Zagorodnyaya E.D. Immunologiya reproduktsii [Immunology of reproduction]. Chita, 2004 (in Russ.).
  30.  Pfeffer P.L., Pearton D.J. Trophoblast development. Reproduction, 2012, 3: 231-246 CrossRef
  31. Politkin D.Yu. Zootekhniya, 2011, 5: 6-7 (in Russ.).
  32. Gridina S.L., Shatalina O.S. Dostizheniya nauki i tekhniki APK, 2011, 6: 69-70 (in Russ.).
  33. Gridina S.L., Romanenko G.A. Vestnik Kurganskoi GSKHA, 2013, 4: 29-31 (in Russ.).
  34. Gridin V.F., Tkachenko I.V. Gridina S.L. Vestnik Kurganskoi GSKHA, 2013, 1: 140-42 (in Russ.).
  35. Starodumov I.M., Panina S.V. Estestvennye i tekhnicheskie nauki, 2008, 4: 96-97 (in Russ.).
  36. Kerro L.V. Ispol'zovanie antigenov grupp krovi v plemennoi rabote s cherno-pestrym skotom Zaural'ya. Avtoreferat kandidatskoi dissertatsii [Use of blood group antigens in breeding black-motley cattle of the Trans-Urals. PhD Thesis]. Kurgan, 2006 (in Russ.).
  37. Sorokovoi P.F. Metodicheskie ukazaniya po issledovaniyu i ispol'zovaniyu grupp krovi v selektsii krupnogo rogatogo skota [Methodological guidelines for the study and use of blood groups in cattle breeding]. Dubrovitsy, 1974 (in Russ.). 
  38. Shadmanov S.I., Stolbov V.M., Pepina G.D. V sbornike: Novoe v razvedenii i genetike sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh [New facets in the breeding and genetics of farm animals]. St. Petersburg, 1973 (in Russ.).
  39. Milovanov V.K., Sokolovskaya I.I. Zhivotnovodstvo, 1964, 6: 75-83 (in Russ.).
  40. Voroshilova E.D. Sibirskii vestnik sel'skokhozyaistvennoi nauki, 2007, 1: 120-121 (in Russ.).

 

back