doi: 10.15389/agrobiology.2018.2.414eng

UDC 636.2:619:618:579.62:615.331

 

USE OF PROBIOTICS GIPROLAM AND SIMBITER-2 TO CORRECT
THE VAGINA BIOCENOSIS IN DOWN-CALVING COWS

A.G. Shakhov, L.Yu. Sashnina, T.A. Yerina

All-Russian Research Veterinary Institute of Pathology, Pharmacology and Therapy RAAS, Federal Agency of Scientific Organizations, 114-b, ul. Lomonosova, Voronezh, 394087 Russia, e-mail A.G.Shakhov@mail.ru(✉ corresponding author) L.Yu.Sashnina@mail.ru, tatjana_erina@rambler.ru

ORCID:
Shakhov A.G. orcid.org/0000-0002-6177-8858
Yerina T.A. orcid.org/0000-0003-2745-8495
Sashnina L.Yu. orcid.org/0000-0001-6477-6156

Received January 26, 2016

 

Postpartum endometritis prophylaxis in high producing dairy cows in the intensive animal husbandry is an urgent one because of great economic losses resulted from the productive function disorder, decreased performance and premature culling. Opportunistic pathogenic microflora and disbacteriosis may cause postpartum endometritis along with specific infections. Potentially dangerous pathogenic bacteria from cows with gynecological pathology contaminate the calves at birth, causing gastrointestinal diseases. Various pharmaceuticals and biologicals could be used to prevent postpartum endometritis, including those providing antioxidative effects, immunomodulatory activity, normalization of hormonal and metabolic status in cows’ genitals and uterine involution. Antibiotics are in most common use, though their frequent application is accompanied by microecological disorders. Probiotics are considered as a perspective alternative to antibiotics for correcting genital microflora in calving cows. In the paper we report a study of the impact of probiotics Giprolam and Simbiter-2 on microflora of down-calving cows’ birth canal in view to prevent postpartum endometritis and intestinal disorders in calves. Thirty-six red-and-white cows with milk yield of 5100-5400 kg for previous lactation were chosen. The cows of the group 1 (n = 12) and group 2 (n = 12) have received Giprolam and Simbiter-2, respectively, for 5-7 days prior to calving every 24 hours, 100 cm3 intravaginally. The cows of the group 3 (n = 12) served as a control (no probiotics). Clinical observations were carried out in mother cows for 14 days after calving, and in the calves during colostrum period. Indigenous and opportunistic microflora was studied in the birth canal before and after calving, in colostrum and in large intestine in the calves. Bacteriologic examination of cervical mucus, reproductive tract discharge, colostrum, excrement, as well as cultural, morphological and biochemical study were performed traditionally. The efficacy of probiotic treatment has been stated. The experiments showed that Giprolam and Simbiter-2 in 71.4 % and 85.8 % cases, respectively, could effectively provide a physiological level of postpartum indigenous microflora, prevent colonization of the reproductive tract by opportunistic and pathogenic microflora and restrict postpartum endometritis. The mother cow treatment with Giprolam and Simbiter-2 could also prevent gastrointestinal diseases in 50.0 % and 41.7 % of the calves, respectively. The high potency of these probiotics is due to lactic acid bacteria capable of genital tract colonization, providing optimal indigenous microflora level and the resistance of the genital tract to harmful microflora.

Keywords: cows, microflora of maternal passages, microflora of colostrum, microflora of intestine in calves, probiotics, postpartum endomitritis, prophylaxis.

 

Full article (Rus)

Full article (Eng)

 

REFERENCES

  1. Nezhdanov A.G., Shakhov A.G. Veterinarnaya patologiya, 2005, 3: 61-64 (in Russ.).
  2. Le Blanc S.J., Duffield T.F., Leslie K.E., Bateman K.G., Keefe G.P., Walton J.S., Johnson W.H. Defining and diagnosing postpartum clinical endometritis and its impact on reproductive performance in dairy cows. American Dairy Science Association, 2002, 85: 2223-2236 CrossRef
  3. Gilbert R.O., Shin S.T., Guard C.L., Erb H.N., Marcel F. Prevalence of endometritis and its effects on reproductive performance of dairy cows. Theriogenology, 2005, 64(9): 1879-1888 CrossRef
  4. Gautam G., Nakao T., Yusuf M., Koike K. Prevalence of endometritis during the postpartum period and its impact on subsequent reproductive performance in two Japanese dairy herds. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 2009, 116(3-4): 175-187 CrossRef
  5. Dubuc J., Duffield T.F., Leslie K.E., Walton J.S., Leblanc S.J. Effects of postpartum uterine diseases on milk production and culling in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 2011, 94(3): 1339-1346 CrossRef
  6. Donofrio G., Herath S., Sartori C., Cavirani S., Flammini F., Sheldon I.M. Bovine herpesvirus 4 is tropic for bovine endometrial cells and modulates endocrine function. Reproduction, 2007, 134(1): 183-197 CrossRef
  7. Donofrio G., Ravanetti L., Cavirani S., Herath S., Capocefalo A., Sheldon I.M. Bacterial infection of endometrial stromal cells influences bovine herpesvirus 4 immediate early gene activation: a new insight into bacterial and viral interaction for uterine disease. Reproduction, 2008, 136(3): 361-366 CrossRef
  8. Fábián K., Makrai L., Sachse K., Szeredi L., Egyed L. An investigation of the aetiological role of bovine herpesvirus 4 in bovine endometritis. Vet. J., 2008, 177(2): 289-292 CrossRef
  9. Liu M.C., Wu C.M., Liu Y.C., Zhao J.C., Yang Y.L, Shen J.Z. Identification, susceptibility, and detection of integrongene cassettes of Arcanobacterium pyogenes in bovine endometritis. J. Dairy Sci., 2009, 92(8): 3659-3666 CrossRef
  10. Petit T., Spergser J., Rosengarten R., Aurich J. Prevalence of potentially pathogenic bacteria as genital pathogens in dairy cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim., 2009, 44(1): 88-91 CrossRef
  11. Bicalho R.C., Machado V.S., Bicalho M.L., Gilbert R.O., Teixeira A.G., Caixeta L.S., Pereira R.V. Molecular and epidemiological characterization of bovine intrauterine Escherichia coli. J. Dairy Sci., 2010, 93(12): 5818-5830 CrossRef
  12. Samokhin V.T., Shakhov A.G., Shegidevich E.I, Fedorov Yu.N., Yurov K.P., Zhidkov S.A., Voronin E.S., Arkhipov A.V., Burlakov A.V., Subbotin V.V., Ivkin N.S., Donchenko A.S., Shkil' N.A., Volkov G.K., Sidorov M.A., Ovsyannikova T.O., Sisyagin P.N., Kavruk L.S., Nikitin V.F., Antipov V.A., Terekhov V.I., Shipitsyn A.G., Petrov Yu.F., Degtyarev V.P. Nauchno obosnovannaya sistema polucheniya zdorovogo molodnyaka i profilaktika zheludochno-kishechnykh boleznei novorozhdennykh telyat [A grounded system for producing healthy young animals and preventing gastrointestinal diseases of newborn calves]. Moscow, 2002 (in Russ.).
  13. Cerri R.L., Rutigliano H.M., Lima F.S., Araújo D.B., Santos J.E. Effect of source of supplemental selenium on uterine health and embryo quality in high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology, 2009, 71(7): 1127-1137 CrossRef
  14. Brozos C.N., Kiossis E., Georgiadis M.P., Piperelis S., Boscos C. The effect of chloride ammonium, vitamin E and Se supplementation throughout the dry period on the prevention of retained fetal membranes, reproductive performance and milk yield of dairy cows. Livestock Science, 2009, 124(1-3): 210-215 CrossRef
  15. Lobodin K.A. Veterinariya, 2006, 7: 38-42. Available https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=9242726. No date (in Russ.).
  16. Kornienko V.S. Lekarstvennyi preparat Ban. A.S. 2140275 (RF) MKIZ A61K35/12, A61K35/50. Filial 5 GNTS — Institut biofiziki FU «Medbioekstrem» pri MZ Rossii ¹ 98110825/13. Zayavl. 04.06.98. Opubl. 27.10.99 [Medication Ban. .. 2140275 (RF) 6135/12, 6135/50. Appl. 04.06.98. Publ. 27.10.99] (in Russ.).
  17. Arlt S., Padberg W., Drillich M., Heuwieser W. Efficacy of homeopathic remedies as prophylaxis of bovine endometritis. J. Dairy Sci., 2009, 92(10): 4945-4953 CrossRef
  18. Barrett A.J., Murray R.D., Christley R.M., Dobson H., Smith R.F. Effects of the administration of oxytocin or carbetocin to dairy cows at parturition on their subsequent fertility. Vet. Rec., 2009, 165(21): 623-626 CrossRef
  19. Zidane K., Niar A., Tainturier D. Comparative effect on clinical use of PGF2 and REPROCINE in the treatment of retained placenta in dairy cows at Tiaret region (Algeria). Asian Journal of Animals and Veterinary Advances, 2011, 6(6): 593-598 CrossRef
  20. Runciman D.J., Anderson G.A., Malmo J., Davis G.M. Effect of intrauterine treatment with cephapirin on the reproductive performance of seasonally calving dairy cows at risk of endometritis following periparturient disease. Aust. Vet. J., 2008, 86(7): 250-258 CrossRef
  21. Galvão K.N., Greco L.F., Vilela J.M., SáFilho M.F., Santos J.E. Effect of intrauterine infusion of ceftiofur on uterine health and fertility in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 2009, 92(4): 1532-1542 CrossRef
  22. Kaufmann T.B., Westermann S., Drillich M., Plöntzke J., Heuwieser W. Systemic antibiotic treatment of clinical endometritis in dairy cows with ceftiofur or two doses of cloprostenol in a 14-d interval. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 2010, 121: 55-62 CrossRef
  23. Machado V.S., Bicalho M.L.S., Pereira R.V., Caixeta L.S., Bittar J.H.J., Oikonomou G., Gilbert R.O., Bicalho R.C. The effect of intrauterine administration of mannose or bacteriophage on uterine health and fertility of dairy cows with special focus on Escherichia coli and Arcanobacterium pyogenes. J. Dairy Sci., 2012, 95: 3100-3109 (10.3168/jds.2011-5063)
  24. Changjun X., Minglei H., Daqing G., Jinghua G., Guizhen X., Jianwei L., Hongbo N.Therapeutic efficacy experiments of Xuyanning in treating endometritis of dairy cows. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2012, 2. Available https://en.cnki.com.cn/Artic-le_en/CJFDTOTAL-HLJK201202016.htm. No date.
  25. Kira E.F. Bakterial'nyi vaginoz [Bacterial vaginosis]. St. Petersburg, 2001 (in Russ.).
  26. Kolesaeva Zh.Yu., Martikainen Z.M., Savicheva A.M. Tarasova M.A. Zhurnal akusherstva i zhenskikh boleznei, 2009, 3: 25-31 (in Russ.).
  27. Dobrokhotova Yu.Z., Zatikyan N.G. Akusherstvo, ginekologiya, reproduktsiya, 2008, 1: 7-9. Available http://www.gyn.su/article.php?what=21. No date (in Russ.).
  28. Garoussi M.T., Khosrave A.R., Havareshti P. Mycoflora of cervicovaginal fluids in dairy cows with or without reproductive disorders. Mycopathologia, 2007, 164(2): 97-100 CrossRef
  29. Ankirskaya A.S. Akusherstvo i ginekologiya, 1995, 6: 13-16 (in Russ.).
  30. Lincke A., Drillich M., Heuwieser W. Die subklinische Endometritis des Rindes und ihr Einfluss auf die Fruchtbarkeit eine Übersicht neuerer Untersuchungen. Berl. Münch. Tierärztl. Wschr, 2007, 120(5-6): 245-250 CrossRef
  31. LeBlans SJ. Postpartum uterine disease and dairy herd reproductive performance: a review. Vet. J., 2008, 176(1): 102-114 CrossRef
  32. Dolezel R., Vecera M., Palenik T., Cech S., Vyskocil M. Systematic clinical examination of early postpartum cows and treatment of puerperal metritis did not have any beneficial effect on subsequent reproductive performance. Veterinarni Medicina, 2008, 53(2): 59-69. Available http://www.vri.cz/docs/vetmed/53-2-59.pdf. No date (in Russ.).
  33. Santos T.M., Caixeta L.S., Machado V.S., Rauf A.K., Gilbert R.O., Bicalho R.C. Antimicrobial resistance and presence of virulence factor genes in Arcanobacterium pyogenes isolated from the uterus of postpartum dairy cows. Vet. Microbiol., 2010, 145(1-2): 84-89 CrossRef
  34. Turchenko A.N., Koba I.S., Novikova E.N., Reshetka M.B., Petenko A.I., Gorpichenko E.A. Veterinariya Kubani, 2012, 3: 11-13. Available https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=17785427. No date (in Russ.).
  35. Otero M.C., Morelli L., Nader-Macias M.E. Probiotic properties of vaginal lactic acid bacteria to prevent metritis in cattle. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2006, 43: 91-97 CrossRef
  36. Fátima M., Nader-Macías E., Claudia O.M., Carolina E.M., Natalia M.C. Advances in the design of probiotic products for the prevention of major diseases in dairy cattle. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2008, 35(11): 1387-1395 CrossRef
  37. Ametaj B.N., Iqbal S., Selami F., Odhiambo J.F., Wang Y., Gänzle M.G., Dunn S.M., Zebeli Q. Intravaginal administration of lactic acid bacteria modulated the incidence of purulent vaginal discharges, plasma haptoglobin concentrations, and milk production in dairy cows. Research in Veterinary Science, 2014, 96(2): 365-370 CrossRef
  38. Yankovskii D.S. Mikrobnaya ekologiya cheloveka: sovremennye vozmozhnosti ee podderzhaniya i vosstanovleniya [Microbial human ecology maintenance and restoration: modern approaches]. Kiev, 2005. Available https://lad.mosuzi.ru/antropologiya/d7f4f702361368547686f389025d7bda. No date (in Russ.).
  39. Sidorov M.A., Skorodumov D.I., Fedotov V.B. Opredelitel' zoopatogennykh mikroorganizmov [Identification keys of zoopathogenic microorganisms]. Moscow, 1995 (in Russ.).
  40. Belyakov V.D. Immunoprofilaktika v immunologii [Immunoprophylaxis in immunology]. Moscow, 1961 (in Russ.).

back